Re: [Sugar-devel] Thoughts on Collab

> On July 23, 2016 at 5:36 PM sam@sam.today wrote: > > > Hi All, > > In the irc meeting 2 nights ago, we discussed adding collaberation to > the journal project feature. Abhijit has spent around 3 weeks working > on it. But we can't even get a text channel between the participants. >

Re: [Sugar-devel] No Documents folder in sugar [FIX]

Sounds like a missing dependency in sugar's rpm spec file to me. > On July 17, 2016 at 5:19 PM Ignacio Rodríguez > wrote: > > > Hello, someone reported a bug in Sugar (SoaS >= f23 or that is what I > understood) [in facebook page (you need a Facebook account to see it)

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Test-Announce] livemedia-creator in f25 rawhide

What to go, will play around once I get a chance Jerry > On July 5, 2016 at 3:48 PM Thomas Gilliard wrote: > > > I am successfully building soas.iso's in fedora 25 (rawhide) [1] > > f24 is documented here [2] > > tom Gilliard > > satellit > > > [1]

Re: [Sugar-devel] Update on SoaS spin in f24 final release

F*** that, I'm in on doing up spins on our own, hit me up on IRC, email, or that dirty method(jvonau5). Jerry > On June 17, 2016 at 4:38 PM Thomas Gilliard wrote: > > > I just had a irc discussion with dgilmore re: SoaS spin: > > 14522162 >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Does anyone intend to produce unsigned images for XOs?

Hi Dave, > On June 15, 2016 at 5:44 AM Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > > > Hi > > (Sora, please see below :) > Last time I did that to somebody who was subscribed to the mailing list I got a blast from them. > On 15 June 2016 at 00:52, Jerr

Re: [Sugar-devel] Does anyone intend to produce unsigned images for XOs?

> On June 14, 2016 at 8:10 PM Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > > > On 14 June 2016 at 22:20, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > > > Um, did you check different branches > > > I checked https://github.com/jvonau/olpc-os-builder-1

Re: [Sugar-devel] Does anyone intend to produce unsigned images for XOs?

> On June 14, 2016 at 7:02 PM Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > > > On 14 June 2016 at 21:10, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > You can poke around https://github.com/jvonau/olpc-os-builder-1 for > > some > > ideas. > > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Does anyone intend to produce unsigned images for XOs?

> On June 14, 2016 at 6:00 PM Dave Crossland wrote: > > > Hi > > Per https://github.com/sugarlabs/olpc-os-builder/issues/1 I thought I'd > check in here to see if anyone intends to produce unsigned images for > XOs? > > -- You can poke around

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.110 Release Cycle

> On June 5, 2016 at 5:02 PM Thomas Gilliard wrote: > > > I have the copr installed in f24 workstation with a sugar-desktop > installed (0.108) > I see sugar 0.109 after dnf update and reboot. > > dnf copr enable samtoday/sugar > > dnf update > > > Observations:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Release Sugar 0.109.0.0

> On May 29, 2016 at 5:01 PM Sam Parkinson <sam.parkins...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > > > >> On May 29, 2016 at 5:27 AM Sam Parkinson <sam.parki

Re: [Sugar-devel] Release Sugar 0.109.0.0

> On May 29, 2016 at 5:27 AM Sam Parkinson > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > This is an unstable release, the 1st of the 0.110 development series. > Tarballs are avaliable for sugar [1] and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 [2]. > > I'd like to thank all the contributors towards

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-On-The-Ground features

e registration service be advertised from the 'schoolserver' via avahi on the local LAN and have the clients query the LAN for the avahi machine name of the registration service being offered, that will take hardcoding of the dns name right out of the picture. Jerry > Tony > > On 05/17

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-On-The-Ground features

connected to webservices. > > Tony > > On 05/17/2016 02:15 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > Only once ds-backup-client is modified to fit into the webservices > > framework and its settings can be viewed/modified from within > > sugar-cp-backup or the webservices applet. > &

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-On-The-Ground features

Only once ds-backup-client is modified to fit into the webservices framework and its settings can be viewed/modified from within sugar-cp-backup or the webservices applet. Just my 'loonie's'[1] worth, Jerry 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loonie > On May 17, 2016 at 6:42 AM Tony Anderson

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar's requirements?

Think the best reference might to have a look at Fedora's spec file[1] OS_builder's kspkglist.10.*.inc package modules[2], sugar broot[3] 1. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/sugar.git/tree/sugar.spec 1A other packages: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/?motif=sugar* 2.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Vision

> On April 20, 2016 at 5:54 PM Dave Crossland wrote: > > > Hi > > On 20 April 2016 at 18:27, James Cameron wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 05:22:21PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote: > > > > > > On 20 April 2016 at 16:46, James Cameron

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Server enhancement

replies inline > On April 18, 2016 at 5:24 AM James Cameron wrote: > > > Tony, when you hold down those four game keys you are installing > software from OLPC. Assuming you haven't set up your own firmware > keys and signed your own images. > It's not that hard, installing

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Server enhancement

Hi Tony, > On April 17, 2016 at 9:06 PM Tony Anderson wrote: > > > Hi, Dave > > It is absurd for reasons I have specified the first time James made this > statement. Please don't use language such as 'absurd' please, I would personally find that offensive if it were

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Server enhancement

> On April 15, 2016 at 6:56 PM Manash Raja wrote: > > > @Jerry, > I haven't modified anything for this feature on the server side. I found > that it uses both idmgr and xs-authserver. But the 5000 port is used by > xs-authserver to display a list of registered laptops. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Server enhancement

er drives with only a small penalty in price. (Actually on Amazon, > the cost per GB seems constant). > > Tony > > On 04/15/2016 04:12 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > Or something like a remote network datastore if I understand what Tony > > is > > in favor of. >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Server enhancement

> On April 15, 2016 at 12:36 AM James Cameron wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:25:59AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote: > > Hi Manash > > > > The registration process is awkward but not the problem. > > This is unfair scope creep. Manash began by asking about bug #362

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Server enhancement

gt;> > > >>Moving from one server to another causes a 'known hosts' issue. This > > >>can be cleared by 'rm -rf ~/.ssh/known_hosts.' > > >> > > >>While registering does show the server in the network section (and > > >>clearing the entry e

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Server enhancement

that would be the forward facing UI. The other advanced tasks would be to figure out a non-olpc client backend and corresponding service for the XSCE. Tony should have some ideas on that. Jerry > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > &g

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Server enhancement

I would ensure that logging is enabled, collaboration server is blank, and try registration again. Should that fail the logs would be useful to have a look at. Jerry > On April 13, 2016 at 11:49 AM Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > Hello Manash, > > I'l

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Server enhancement

Hello Manash, I'll have a bunch of questions, because my crystal ball is in the repair shop. ;) > On April 13, 2016 at 10:45 AM Manash Raja wrote: > > > I have installed XSCE schoolserver on CentOS running in Virtualbox. > I saw your question in the chat-room, please be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proxy Settings Feature in the recent versions of sugar

Yea that has roots to the old ActivityCentral fork, any reason why this has not been 'upstreamed' from OneEducation(OLPC-AU) to SugarLabs? > On March 13, 2016 at 8:18 PM Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > > > There are a old patch from Manuel Quiñones here that could be useful: > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC proposal status

Hi Tony, > On February 22, 2016 at 1:32 AM Tony Anderson > wrote: > > > Hi, Jerry > > When I am talking about Sugar, I am referring to 0.106. You will find > ds-backup.py and ds-backup.sh in /usr/bin. The shell script determines > whether the > schoolserver is

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC proposal status

Hi Samuel, > On February 21, 2016 at 5:56 PM Samuel Greenfeld > wrote: > > > Just for the record: > > The XO laptop backup mechanism for Sugar creates separate > "datastore--MM-DD_HH:MM" directories for each backup. > That is not integrated into sugar(the last time

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Planned system maintenance on Sunjammer starting NOW

http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/ returns "403 Forbidden" Jerry > On February 8, 2016 at 12:37 AM Bernie Innocenti > wrote: > > > Sunjammer is now back online with Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. All hosted websites > and services appear to be running correctly, but please

[Sugar-devel] FYI

Hi, there has been an "Unresponsive maintainer procedure" started for tuxbrewr[1] in Fedora. Someone from SugarLabs may want to step in and become the point of contact for the sugar related packages[2]. If not, I apologize for the noise. Jerry 1. https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1535 2.

Re: [Sugar-devel] FYI

it has for Sugar. > > Tony > > On 02/06/2016 04:39 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > Hi, there has been an "Unresponsive maintainer procedure" started for > > tuxbrewr[1] in Fedora. Someone from SugarLabs may want to step in and > > become the point of contact for the s

Re: [Sugar-devel] Working text to speech example needed

Think you might be missing the pygobject2 rpm, from 'dnf info pygobject2' Description : The pygobject2 package provides a convenient wrapper for the GObject library : for use in Python programs. Hope it helps and/or works, Jerry > On January 23, 2016 at 12:55 PM James Simmons

Re: [Sugar-devel] ./osbuild shell not valid command

> On November 24, 2015 at 2:14 PM James Cameron wrote: > > > I'd like to see *.spec.in and a debian equivalent hosted in the > upstream repositories, along with README files that explain how to > make packages from the repositories. > Here here, total agreement from me.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse Failed to Start

It appears to be a error reading a gconf/gsettings, not sure which as there is(was?) a compatibility hack in sugar that reads gconf if it exists. I don't recall if browse worked on F23 SugarOnAStick or sugar-runner. Others might be able to shed more light on config value that are(not) set in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] ./osbuild shell not valid command

good idea. I have no idea why it doesn't run now and > I > don't have the time to dive into it now. > > Thanks, > Sam > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > Sam/others who might chime in. > > > > There h

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 v0.106.1 (bug fixes release)

> On November 17, 2015 at 12:54 AM Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > > > > On November 16, 2015 at 7:44 PM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > > > Interesting you wait ~45 days to respond. > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 201

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 v0.106.1 (bug fixes release)

> On November 16, 2015 at 7:44 PM James Cameron wrote: > > Interesting you wait ~45 days to respond. > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:53:17AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > > James wrote: > > > (There is an irritating problem with XO-1 and XO-1.5 where the > > > Fedora 18 i386

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.0 release

> On October 19, 2015 at 11:56 AM Martin Abente > wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > As an official kick-off for the 0.108 development cycle [1], we have > released a new *UNSTABLE* version of Sugar. This first 0.107.x release > includes a fair amount of changes

Re: [Sugar-devel] How to install TuxMath and TuxPaint on Release 13.2.5+ on "ALL" XOs!

> On October 15, 2015 at 4:24 PM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:56:06AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > > On October 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> > > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] How to install TuxMath and TuxPaint on Release 13.2.5+ on "ALL" XOs!

> On October 16, 2015 at 4:02 AM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:53:21PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > > > > > > On October 15, 2015 at 4:24 PM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> > > > wrote: > &

Re: [Sugar-devel] How to install TuxMath and TuxPaint on Release 13.2.5+ on "ALL" XOs!

> On October 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM James Cameron wrote: > > > Can you tell us the length of the testing you've done? > Just opening the activity, poke around a bit with the intent that educators can make an evaluation and report bugs. > My tests of 2.0.3 on 31st August were

Re: [Sugar-devel] how to remove WiFi credential/history from Sugar?

> On September 25, 2015 at 12:06 PM Paul Fox wrote: > > > adam wrote: > > "rm /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/key_" does not fully delete a > > WiFi > > credential, even after reboot of the XO-1.5 with Sugar 0.106.0, the > > password is clearly still buried+working in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 8, 2015 at 6:55 PM Peter Robinson > wrote: > > > >> So to briefly restate. > >> > >> Problem: Sugar does not start on F23. > >> > >> Diagnosis: the shared library libsugarext.so.0 cannot be loaded, > >> because of a missing symbol, yet the symbol can be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 5, 2015 at 10:21 AM Martin Abente > wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:01 PM, James Cameron wrote: > > > So to briefly restate. > > > > Problem: Sugar does not start on F23. > > > > Diagnosis: the shared library

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 4, 2015 at 6:12 PM Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > > > > On September 4, 2015 at 12:37 PM Martin Abente > > <martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Peter, > > > > On Fri, Se

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 4, 2015 at 12:37 PM Martin Abente > wrote: > > > Hello Peter, > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Peter Robinson > wrote: > > > > > On 4 Sep 2015 00:22, "Martin Abente" > > wrote: > > > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM Martin Abente > wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > I rebuilt 0.106.0 packages from fc23 source rpms, for fc22 x86_64. So did I using my copr account, what a great tool to build rpms with, perhaps SL should go back to using

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 3, 2015 at 12:38 AM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 12:11:38AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > F22 upgrades clean to 106, feels pretty zippy in a VM. Back to > > figuring out what is now different in the dep

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 3, 2015 at 1:34 AM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 01:21:19AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > > > > > > On September 3, 2015 at 12:38 AM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> > > > wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 3, 2015 at 12:58 PM Martin Abente > <martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > > On September 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM Martin

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 2, 2015 at 3:49 PM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:59:06AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > > > > > > On September 1, 2015 at 9:16 PM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> > > > wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 2, 2015 at 7:21 PM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 06:49:50PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > Would installing 106 on F22-21 be worth anything? > > I guess so. If the problem occurs, blame 0.106. If it does not

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 1, 2015 at 9:16 PM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > That leads me to think if sugar is building against a library that > > is only available in sugar's toolkit

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 1, 2015 at 3:39 PM "Sam P." wrote: > > > No, that is exactly the same issue. If you open the log attached < > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1048658> you'll see > "GLib.Error: g-invoke-error-quark: Could not locate acme_volume_alsa_new: >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 v0.106.1 (bug fixes release)

> On September 1, 2015 at 6:35 AM Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > > > > > On September 1, 2015 at 2:30 AM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > Should have my coffee before email... > updates to: > https://archive.fedorapro

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 v0.106.1 (bug fixes release)

> On September 1, 2015 at 2:30 AM James Cameron wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 01:32:17PM -0600, German Ruiz - FundacionZT > wrote: > > Thank you Martin > > > > Here is the repo for 0.106.1 :) > > http://dev.laptop.org/~german/rpms/sugar/ > > Thanks. > > I've

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 v0.106.1 (bug fixes release)

> On September 1, 2015 at 9:31 PM James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:35:43AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > Why make the end users deal with broken repos. The issue could be > > avoided at the olpc-os-builder level by changing

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 1, 2015 at 9:05 AM Peter Robinson > wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > > GLib.Error: g-invoke-error-quark: Could not locate > > acme_volume_alsa_new: > > 'acme_volume_alsa_new':

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

base two issues come to mind, first something changed with lightdm. The second is Upowers' API changed. https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4781 Do you have any pointer off the top of your head? Thanks in advance, Jerry Vonau ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

> On September 1, 2015 at 8:50 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > > Adding Soas maintainer Peter Robinson > > I'm on the mailing list, you _REALLY_ don't need

Re: [Sugar-devel] Spell checker, Grammar checker for Write

Hi Sam, On August 30, 2015 at 2:46 AM Sam P. sam@sam.today wrote: Hi Lionel, I think it is an abiword config thing. On my Fedora laptop, both abiword and Write Activity have a spell checker. I don't think you need a plugin. In this case perhaps a dictionary needs to be installed

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-install-bundle in 13.2.5 is slooow

Hi Tony, I brought concerns about that change, with regards to OSbuilder but I guess that change is slowing down the console now. Have you tried TinyCore[1] that would boot without setting having SUGAR_PROFILE. I've used TinyCore to install activities in the past, checkout XO.custom in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] an extra UNSTABLE 0.105.3 release (code-frozen)

Hi Guys, The issue is the metadata_expire=7d setting in the repo file. New updates under 7 days old will not be seen by the yum client until the metadata expires and is refreshed from the yum repo. Yum clean all comes with a network cost as all repos' metadata needs to be re-fetched, you could

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC projects

Hi Iain: On March 19, 2015 at 5:25 PM Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: Hi James, Thank you for taking the time to make a thoughtful contribution. Perhaps you will forgive me if I brainstorm this a bit. On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 08:48 +1100, James Cameron wrote: I've

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC projects

On March 19, 2015 at 6:30 PM Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: Hi Jerry, If one knew that a SoaS CD would always make a Sugar stick, the prospect of selling the CD, (by third parties ?) becomes more doable. Is there any specific branding that you want to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Planning for the future (Samuel Greenfeld)

On February 27, 2015 at 6:23 AM Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote: I know this is not a sugar issue directly, more of an OLPC issue but since Fedora F12 the entire i686 platform's userland is being compiled

Re: [Sugar-devel] Planning for the future (Samuel Greenfeld)

On February 24, 2015 at 8:55 AM Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: I don't think Sugar Labs has lacked a long-term vision. It has been since Day One to provide great tools for learning to children while being hardware agnostic. That said, our tactics have been slowly evolving

Re: [Sugar-devel] Planning for the future (Samuel Greenfeld)

On February 25, 2015 at 3:09 PM James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 01:20:19PM -0600, Jerry Vonau wrote: I know this is not a sugar issue directly, more of an OLPC issue but since Fedora F12 the entire i686 platform's userland is being compiled with -mtune

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] avoid reporting missing DCON

On February 18, 2015 at 5:09 PM James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: The DCON is OLPC XO specific and the absence need not be reported. Removes message:        ERROR root: Cannot unfreeze the DCON However, this doesn't fix an immediately preceeding message:        ERROR dbus.proxies:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] unstable 0.103.2 release and API, UI and String freeze.

On January 16, 2015 at 9:51 PM Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: To help with testing it would be nice if RPMS based on these versions could be made available via Fedora's updates-testing repo (or maybe koji) for F20-F21. We've never pushed new major releases

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] unstable 0.103.2 release and API, UI and String freeze.

Hi All: On January 16, 2015 at 6:17 AM Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, These are the tarballs for the _last_  0.103.x UNSTABLE release, and with this release we reach the API, UI and String freeze [1].     -    

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] unstable 0.103.2 release and API, UI and String freeze.

On January 16, 2015 at 6:25 PM Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On January 16, 2015 at 6:17 AM Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, These are the tarballs for the _last_  0.103.x UNSTABLE release, and with this release we reach the

Re: [Sugar-devel] subject changed from upper case

Let's analyze why this email was flagged as spam with an eye to helping instead of a blanket I'll report you. On January 11, 2015 at 11:39 AM Ryan Cunningham rvskmbr...@gmail.com wrote: The message you have sent appears to be spam: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.9

Re: [Sugar-devel] Image with F20 for XO 1.75

On January 8, 2015 at 1:44 PM James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: I've made XO-1.75 images for Fedora 20, but have not published them. There was no difficulty using olpc-os-builder to make the images, using the master branch of the builder. Think the 1.75 ini file in /examples is

Re: [Sugar-devel] Just wondering

-0600, Jerry Vonau wrote: Hi Sam, On December 19, 2014 at 5:40 PM Sam P. sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jerry, I would guess that it does require X.  The rational for using BundleRegistry is that it emits all the right signals to the gui

[Sugar-devel] Just wondering

Does the use of BundleRegistry()[1] require X to be started? I'm thinking yes as 'protected_activities' in the __init__ part is really a dconf-service setting that is returned as a string. I'm asking as a recent commit was added[2] that just might break olpc-os-builder(OOB). OOB relies upon

Re: [Sugar-devel] Just wondering

this is because my github tracking of sugarlabs/sugar is turned on and was cleaning up my email. So I'm back to watching the jets vs the bruins in hockey. Jerry On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:22:41PM -0600, Jerry Vonau wrote: Hi Sam, On December 19, 2014 at 5:40 PM Sam P. sam.parkins...@gmail.com

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: French keyboard map for XO-4 non-membrane keyboard

On December 14, 2014 at 2:06 PM James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:54:49PM +0100, Lionel Laské wrote: (Sorry, probably not the right for this question list but [1]lists.laptop.org seems to be down) Yes.  Reuben is working on it. We're starting a small

Re: [Sugar-devel] Widget to show a notification message with a link

On December 9, 2014 at 6:59 AM Gustavo Duarte gus.dua...@gmail.com wrote: I checked this file, and there are these entries, already, as is showed bellow. text/html                                  org.laptop.WebActivity application/xhtml+xml             org.laptop.WebActivity

Re: [Sugar-devel] Widget to show a notification message with a link

Hi Gustavo, On December 6, 2014 at 10:42 AM Gustavo Duarte gus.dua...@gmail.com wrote: Add an actions, isn't an option, because the notification-daemon (Ubuntu 12.04 precise) does't support actions. From freedesktop specs https://developer.gnome.org/notification-spec/ Actions The

Re: [Sugar-devel] Widget to show a notification message with a link

sugar-launch org.laptop.WebActivity --uri $uri Thanks a lot for all your tips, were very helpfully. Gustavo. On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote: Hi Gustavo, On December 6, 2014 at 10:42 AM Gustavo Duarte gus.dua...@gmail.com wrote: Add an actions

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Hi All, Hate to report that due to dependencies pointed out earlier[1], sugar-tamtam has been retired from F21[2]. -- Original Message -- From: nob...@fedoraproject.org To: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: November 24, 2014 at 4:02 AM Subject: [POC-change] Fedora packages

Re: [Sugar-devel] link required for ./osbuild pull not working

On November 2, 2014 at 10:01 AM Nurendra Choudhary nurendrachoudhar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I was trying to install the sugar labs environment. But I got this error in ./osbuild pull: Cloning into 'browse'... fatal: unable to access 'https://src.sugarlabs.org/browse/mainline.git/':

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: F-21 Branched report: 20141024 changes (sugar-tamtam deps)

Hi All: Might want to have a look at this issue in the future. -- Original Message -- From: Fedora Branched Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org Date: October 24, 2014 at 6:24 AM Subject: F-21 Branched report: 20141024 changes Compose started at Fri Oct 24 07:15:02 UTC 2014

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing images with SUgar 0.102

Gonzalo That only applies to rpms for F21, F20 would still be missing that Requires, hence would not be dragged in automatically. Jerry On September 11, 2014 at 9:51 AM Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: The dconf dependecy should be solved upstream now:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Building a customized image of Sugar .100

Hi James, On September 2, 2014 at 10:25 PM James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 06:17:48PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: What is really handy to have for debugging is a copy of the master kickstart file used at image creation time. This file has the order

[Sugar-devel] [PATCH] update SOAS's kickstart file to use gsettings

Hi all, Think this maybe needed for SOAS going forward. Jerrydiff --git a/fedora-livecd-soas.ks b/fedora-livecd-soas.ks index a23afed..187d658 100644 --- a/fedora-livecd-soas.ks +++ b/fedora-livecd-soas.ks @@ -76,13 +76,19 @@ sed -i 's/^#autologin-user=.*/autologin-user=liveuser/'

Re: [Sugar-devel] Building a customized image of Sugar .100

On September 3, 2014 at 6:17 PM James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: +CC devel@ http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10918 On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:04:21AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: Hi James, On September 2, 2014 at 10:25 PM James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2014

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100 features on Sugar 0.102 build

On September 2, 2014 at 11:54 AM Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: I don't care one way or the other how you guys configure olpc-os-builder, but as a Sugar platform contributor, I think sugar packages should come with all the bells and whistles included, and if any

Re: [Sugar-devel] Building a customized image of Sugar .100

gus.dua...@gmail.com wrote: I applied the changes indicated  on http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10918  and same error happened, please see the out.txt and the module after applied changes. On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote: hum, guess the logging is showing

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100 features on Sugar 0.102 build

Would that not require the sugar-cp-background rpm to installed in the image? Don't see it listed in OOB[1]. 1. https://github.com/sugarlabs/olpc-os-builder/blob/SL102/modules/sugar/kspkglist.50.sugar.inc Jerry On August 29, 2014 at 7:48 PM Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Can

Re: [Sugar-devel] jita.sugarlabs.org?

Don't forget about patching gtk3 for set_with_data[1] that sugar is using but not in gtk3 proper[2]. Jerry 1. https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4483 2. https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4307 On August 28, 2014 at 7:56 AM James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: Yes, but they did not seem

Re: [Sugar-devel] Building a customized image of Sugar .100

OK, there is a difference in the ini file for XO-4 and the others[1], for the XO-4 cntlm was added to the rpm list in the ini file and the systemd service was enabled in modules/base/kspost.10.core.inc. This would fail on non-XO-4 builds as the rpm is missing, it would be better to add the rpm to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Building a customized image of Sugar .100

is safe to remove it in more common network environments. No idea how can be related to the error posted before. Gonzalo On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote: OK, there is a difference in the ini file for XO-4 and the others[1], for the XO-4 cntlm was added

Re: [Sugar-devel] Building a customized image of Sugar .100

On August 18, 2014 at 9:53 AM Gustavo Duarte gus.dua...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying with AU oob scripts, from https://github.com/godiard/olpc-os-builder/tree/au1b, and using a USB driver, :) to avoid nfs problem, and the generation isn't finishing well, the error showed bellow occurs. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] optional automatic updates

On August 11, 2014 at 10:35 AM Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Um, sugar 0.100 was not that long ago, kind of liked the way the old sugar-update-control worked, all that was really missing was the auto-updating. For the record there never was a sugar-control-panel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] optional automatic updates

On August 7, 2014 at 10:17 PM Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote: On August 7, 2014 at 8:33 PM Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Jerry

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] optional automatic updates

Hi, On August 5, 2014 at 7:34 PM Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, A few development cycles ago, dsd added a useful new feature: automatic activities updates. Um, sugar 0.100 was not that long ago, kind of liked the way the old sugar-update-control

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] optional automatic updates

On August 7, 2014 at 8:33 PM Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote: Hi, On August 5, 2014 at 7:34 PM Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, A few development

Re: [Sugar-devel] Cannot connect to internet on school server

Haque)      2. Re: Pootle SOS (Martin Abente) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 23:01:59 +0530 From: Athar Haque findat...@gmail.com To: Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca Cc: Sugar-dev Devel sugar-devel

  1   2   3   >