[Sugar-devel] Stepping down

2011-11-17 Thread Lucian Branescu
This email is long overdue. As you might have noticed, I haven't contributed to Browse/Sugar in a long time. It was partly frustration with the technologies (GTK3/introspection migration, I hate you), partly lack of money; but mostly it was lack of spare time. I still don't have any more free

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please get surf-115.xo nominated and thus visible on ASLO

2011-09-16 Thread Lucian Branescu
Surf is simply not ready, and broken in many ways. I haven't had time to work on it, or Browse for that matter. Also, a fully working Surf requires moving to pygobject-introspection (in the whole of sugar-toolkit), which might require moving to gtk3 as well. On 16 September 2011 04:28, Thomas C

Re: [Sugar-devel] Statically Built Chromium for my XO

2011-08-10 Thread Lucian Branescu
It's likely that those libraries already exist on your machine, but with slightly different names. You could install them, too. Try making symlinks in the chromium dir to the real libs. On 10 August 2011 10:23, Basanta Shrestha basanta.shres...@olenepal.org wrote: Hi, I am looking to install

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse and the move to WebKit

2011-06-24 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 22 June 2011 12:54, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote: On 21 June 2011 23:23, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: 2. In order to get Browse, Help and Wikipedia up and running on webkit, do you see the need for a hulahop equivalent? Or some kind of sugar-level web widget

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse and the move to WebKit

2011-06-24 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 24 June 2011 14:10, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On 24 June 2011 13:08, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: Just nitpicking, but gtk2/pygi is a perfectly good option as well, and it may even work with sugar-toolkit (depending on the status of python-gobject and sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse and the move to WebKit

2011-06-24 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 24 June 2011 15:13, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote: On 24 Jun 2011, at 13:08, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to see a lot of experimentation with html activities outside the platform before we even consider integrating. There is just too much

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse and the move to WebKit

2011-06-14 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 14 June 2011 20:58, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: 2. What is the state of Surf? This is the existing webkit-based browser for Sugar. Does it work well? Is it reliable? What are the gaping holes? It works reasonably well. I couldn't implement cookies for example, because that requires

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH Browse 1/2] Fix Stopping if downloads are in progress

2011-05-23 Thread Lucian Branescu
Looks good, although it'd be nice at some point for Sugar itself to manage force closes better. Wouldn't it be better if I gave you commit rights on mainline instead? On 23 May 2011 16:30, Rafael Ortiz raf...@activitycentral.com wrote: On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Sascha Silbe

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH Browse 1/2] Fix Stopping if downloads are in progress

2011-05-23 Thread Lucian Branescu
I gave you commit and review rights. Feel free to commit the two patches yourself, removing me as a bottleneck. On 23 May 2011 17:14, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: Looks good, although it'd be nice at some point for Sugar itself to manage force closes better. Wouldn't

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH Browse 1/2] Fix Stopping if downloads are in progress

2011-05-23 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 23 May 2011 17:46, Rafael Ortiz raf...@activitycentral.com wrote: On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: I gave you commit and review rights. Feel free to commit the two patches yourself, removing me as a bottleneck. Ok Thanks Lucian, about

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse activity

2011-05-18 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 18 May 2011 16:00, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Art Hunkins abhun...@uncg.edu wrote: Yes, this is particularly crucial as there is no Browse in 0.92 Sugar. (I

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] XO1 | Same hardware, slower internet

2011-03-28 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 28 March 2011 23:01, Anish Mangal an...@activitycentral.org wrote: Hi, With time, as hardware gets more complex, software gets bloated up to use the excess processor cycles available. A part of it is the websites that get more content heavy, bulky and slow with time. Considering that the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Twisted Sugar Advice

2011-03-17 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 17 March 2011 16:45, Mike Rehner babareh...@gmail.com wrote: I'm a retired computer science teacher with a limited amount of python experience. About a month and a half ago I decided to volunteer about 8-12 hours a week of time to Sugar Labs. Unfortunately Sugar Labs is using a software

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem downloading files using Browse Activity

2011-02-23 Thread Lucian Branescu
I've reopened the ticket, feel free to post this log there. I'll have a look. On Wednesday, 23 February 2011 at 14:01, Daniel Castelo wrote: We have some problems using browse activity V120. We can't download files attached in gmail (apparently happen with many sites) The activity doesn't

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH Read] adapt to evince 2.30 API (SL#1900)

2010-12-14 Thread Lucian Branescu
Thanks a lot for finding the time to do this, I've been much more busy than anyone should be lately. It even took me 10 days to reply to this :) On 5 December 2010 12:41, Sascha Silbe sascha-...@silbe.org wrote: From: Lucian Branescu Mihaila lucian.brane...@gmail.com PDFs are working fine

Re: [Sugar-devel] GTK3 rendered in a browser

2010-11-26 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 24 November 2010 17:52, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote: Saw this and instantly thought of Sugar being rendered in a browser. http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2010/11/23/gtk3-vs-html5/ Looks interesting. Solutions like this would help to deprecate X11. Although for Sugar in a browser, you'd

Re: [Sugar-devel] Eliminate Glucose co-maintainers

2010-11-22 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 22 November 2010 12:02, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 11/22/2010 03:04 AM, Martin Dengler wrote: I propose we eliminate co-maintainers from Glucose[1] because they reduce the responsibility and pressure of a sole maintainer. I see it the other way around. Reducing the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Audio tag not wroking in browse

2010-11-21 Thread Lucian Branescu
It's up to xulrunner (gecko) to support audio. What version of xulrunner are you using?On Sunday, 21 November 2010 at 09:36, javed khan wrote:i checked the html5 audio tag but it is not working, any patch for it___ Sugar-devel mailing

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-120

2010-11-11 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 11 November 2010 16:40, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 10/25/2010 10:36 AM, Lucian Branescu wrote: On 25 October 2010 09:25, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de  wrote: On 10/25/2010 09:31 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 06:51:15PM -0400, Lucian

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-120

2010-10-25 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 25 October 2010 09:25, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 10/25/2010 09:31 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 06:51:15PM -0400, Lucian Branescu Mihaila wrote: http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-120.tar.bz2 Please push a tag

Re: [Sugar-devel] stepping down as maintainer

2010-10-24 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 19 October 2010 17:50, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi, for personal reasons have to drastically reduce my involvement in the project. Will be leaving maintenance of my modules and unsubscribing from the mailing lists. My place on the board is vacant from now on and I'll be

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-120

2010-10-24 Thread Lucian Branescu Mihaila
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-120.tar.bz2 == News == * Release 120 (Lucian Branescu Mihaila) * fix error writing file if there are not a url in the location bar (Gonzalo Odiard) * Fix OLPC #6874 - Web activity uses gettext on file name

Re: [Sugar-devel] Home button in browse - toolbar images

2010-10-22 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 22 October 2010 12:05, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Lucien: I have added the patches to http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10364 Can you review it? Patch looks good, but it makes the toolbar extremely crowded. I'll accept it for now, with the caveat of having a Browse toolbar overhaul

Re: [Sugar-devel] Home button in browse - toolbar images

2010-10-22 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 22 October 2010 12:44, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 October 2010 12:05, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Lucien: I have added the patches to http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10364

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-119

2010-10-19 Thread Lucian Branescu
Thanks a lot. I'll do a new release after I fix the tab close crash. On 19 Oct 2010 14:41, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: I have commited a patch to solve the problem when you quit from the activity and there are not a valid url active. Gonzalo I have two interesting traces. Have

Re: [Sugar-devel] Home button in browse - toolbar images

2010-10-19 Thread Lucian Branescu
2010/10/19 NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu: You could just make the new tab show the home url by default. It already does. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-119

2010-10-15 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 15 October 2010 17:15, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 10/15/2010 12:30 AM, Lucian Branescu Mihaila wrote: == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-119.tar.bz2 == News == This is a bugfix release. * Release 119 (Lucian Branescu

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-119

2010-10-14 Thread Lucian Branescu Mihaila
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-119.tar.bz2 == News == This is a bugfix release. * Release 119 (Lucian Branescu Mihaila) * generate preview image for downloaded images (SL#1106) (Gonzalo Odiard) * Fix history on resume. The code is a bit hacky

Re: [Sugar-devel] Home button in browse - toolbar images

2010-10-14 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 14 October 2010 19:47, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Gonzalo, On 5 Oct 2010, at 20:32, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Gary: Here are the screenshots. I comented a check of cairo version to add the tabs button. toolbar-browse-0.90.png and  toolbar-browse-0.84.png are with the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Read: focus after launching

2010-10-14 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 14 October 2010 09:38, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Wed Oct 13 12:45:09 +0200 2010: when working on the issue in Read that the dpad keys do not work directly when in ebook mode [1], I postulated that Read when it comes

Re: [Sugar-devel] Status of Read activity (was: Re: Read Activity on Fedora 14 / SoaS v4)

2010-10-09 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 9 October 2010 14:01, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Lucian Branescu's message of Tue Sep 28 22:34:01 +0200 2010: Epub support is not complete, you can see epubs, but none of the toolbars work. [...] FWIW, I'd much rather see a working, but

Re: [Sugar-devel] Status of Read activity (was: Re: Read Activity on Fedora 14 / SoaS v4)

2010-10-09 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 9 October 2010 15:28, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 14:08 +0100, Lucian Branescu wrote: Who is the Read maintainer these days? AUTHORS still says Sayamindu, but AIUI he stopped working on Sugar stuff. Then I could probably use commit rights on Read

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposal of dotted activity version number

2010-10-08 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 7 October 2010 21:54, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Ticket with the start of implementation: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2425 Gonzalo I'm not sure which way would be best, but I would choose either a very simple solution (just dotted numbers, no alphanumerics) or a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Autocomplete functionality for the address does not work #2406

2010-10-06 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 6 October 2010 14:20, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from simon's message of Wed Oct 06 13:57:20 +0200 2010: see as well #2291 for more info. This one is important for 0.90. A bit more background information would be nice. A one-line summary of the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Autocomplete functionality for the address does not work #2406

2010-10-06 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 6 October 2010 14:31, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 10/06/2010 03:23 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: On 10/06/2010 03:20 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: Excerpts from simon's message of Wed Oct 06 13:57:20 +0200 2010: see as well #2291 for more info. This one is important for 0.90.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse SL#1106, OLPC#8857: Re: Help with pending reviews

2010-10-06 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 6 October 2010 20:19, Sascha Silbe si...@sugarlabs.org wrote: [Moving this to sugar-devel as I don't see any need to keep it private] Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Oct 05 14:58:24 +0200 2010: #1106 Browse: No preview in Journal for downloaded image

Re: [Sugar-devel] about reader

2010-09-29 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 29 September 2010 14:08, Gabriel Eirea gei...@gmail.com wrote: Hi: I'm replying to the list for more feedback. Please see below. 2010/9/29 Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com: On 29 September 2010 13:24, Gabriel Eirea gei...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Lucian: I've seen you are actively

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-118

2010-09-29 Thread Lucian Branescu Mihaila
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-118.tar.bz2 == News == Mostly just translations. * Release 118 (Lucian Branescu Mihaila) * Commit from Sugar Labs: Translation System by user mschlager.: 29 of 30 messages translated (0 fuzzy). (Pootle daemon

Re: [Sugar-devel] Read Activity on Fedora 14 / SoaS v4

2010-09-28 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 28 September 2010 21:26, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 09/28/2010 10:14 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 28 21:00:22 +0200 2010: Ok, Lucian just explained me the rationale behind the Fedora version. Version 79 is coming from the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Home button in Browse

2010-09-06 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 6 September 2010 15:25, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, I can well imagine there had been several discussions about this before, even so a quick search of the archives did not reveal something: Deployment(s) have been asking how to go back to the home page (OLPC start

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Home button in Browse

2010-09-06 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 6 September 2010 16:53, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 06.09.2010, at 17:50, Sascha Silbe wrote: Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 06 16:25:03 +0200 2010: I would say, adding a button that brings you back to the defined default page would be a good

Re: [Sugar-devel] view source

2010-08-30 Thread Lucian Branescu
You can't customise it, but you can offer a document to be viewed alongside the python source. Check how Browse does it. On 30 Aug 2010 22:13, Erik Blankinship er...@mediamods.com wrote: How do you customize what is shown when view source is selected for an activity?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bump Python dependency from 2.5 to 2.6

2010-08-25 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 25 August 2010 15:23, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, raised during the review of [1] some code was relying on Python 2.6 (with open(COUNTRY_CODES_PATH) as codes_file:). Is it sane to switch to this Python version for the Sugar platform? More readings on what is new in

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC question

2010-08-25 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 25 August 2010 19:44, samir menon menon.sa...@gmail.com wrote: So I have hearing a lot about Google Summer of Code on the mailing list (specifically,, Dinko Galetic's project!) What happens when they finish their project? Do the projects (read: Dinko's project) get submitted as a patch for

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse-115 stops when pop-up tab closes

2010-08-18 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 18 August 2010 03:06, Christoph Derndorfer christoph.derndor...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: Afaict, this isn't a bug in Browse, but in sugar.activity.Activity. I also can't find any evidence in the logs

Re: [Sugar-devel] Appropriate to call myself senior developer?

2010-08-15 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 15 August 2010 05:19, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: El Sat, 14-08-2010 a las 12:28 +0200, Sascha Silbe escribió: Hi! Would anyone dislike me calling myself senior developer and system administrator at Sugar Labs in my CV or consider it inappropriate? If so, what other

Re: [Sugar-devel] (no subject)

2010-08-15 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 15 August 2010 15:38, u...@dev.seeta.in wrote: HI all, When we start sugar-emulator in ubuntu , The title text in emulator window shows [Xephyr on 30.0].Now , after going through code and other resources what i deducted is that Xephyr is window/session manager which we uses to run sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse-115 stops when pop-up tab closes

2010-08-14 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 14 August 2010 07:01, Tabitha Roder tabi...@tabitha.net.nz wrote: On 12/08/2010, Christoph Derndorfer christoph.derndor...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, submitted the bug which should hit Sascha Silbe's inbox for moderation right about now. http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2155 We have this

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse-115 stops when pop-up tab closes

2010-08-12 Thread Lucian Branescu
is it? Sugar 0.88 On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: This exception doesn't seem related to the cairo bug. I'll try to reproduce it on my XO. Please file a bug report if you haven't already. Should I file the bug with  Sugar Labs or OLPC? Sugar Labs http

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse-115 stops when pop-up tab closes

2010-08-11 Thread Lucian Branescu
This exception doesn't seem related to the cairo bug. I'll try to reproduce it on my XO. Please file a bug report if you haven't already. Cairo version: cairo-1.8.8-1.fc11.i586 Traceback (most recent call last):   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gobject/__init__.py, line 108,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse-115 stops when pop-up tab closes

2010-08-10 Thread Lucian Branescu
Yes, it is a bug. It has been observed that under certain versions of cairo, Browse with tabs crashes. V115 checks for this and disables tabs if such a version is detected. It's possible that other versions of cairo are problematic, too. Please attach Browse's log and report your cairo version,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-09 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 9 August 2010 11:25, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 09.08.2010, at 01:21, John Gilmore wrote: As long as activities are saving and restoring properly it could be  made pretty much transparent to the user. Of course that's easier  said then done... Android has a whole

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-09 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 9 August 2010 14:44, NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu wrote: Sugar has a similar mechanism. From the Low-level Activity API docs: org.laptop.Activity.SetActive(b: active) Activate or passivate an activity. This is sent when switching activities, there is only one active activity at a time,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-08 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 8 August 2010 20:33, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote: On 8 Aug 2010, at 18:40, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote: The idea of killing activities with the content closed seems ok but it would probably be a good idea to have a way to opt out of it for some apps. I'm

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-08 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 8 August 2010 20:51, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote: On 8 Aug 2010, at 20:38, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: Imo a confirmation popup would become annoying very quickly. Also if the user refuses, the kernel will have soon to kill an activity, which is worst

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-117

2010-08-05 Thread Lucian Branescu Mihaila
Bugfix release, adds a missing tab icon. Please test this and report back any issues with tabs, from functionality to design. Note: tabs will disable themselves if you have a version of cairo that would crash Browse. == Source ==

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-116

2010-08-02 Thread Lucian Branescu Mihaila
- keyboard shortcuts for back/forward/reload - add CAcert - user-visible tab support. Note that the tab support will disable itself if it detects cairo v = 1.08.10 == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-116.tar.bz2

Re: [Sugar-devel] Changing bundle_id and version scheme for Etoys

2010-07-28 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 27 July 2010 23:57, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 18:21 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote: This is a nicely decentralized mechanism for choosing identifiers which are guaranteed by construction never to conflict. It is indeed a simple and nice scheme, but

Re: [Sugar-devel] Evince browser plugin

2010-07-28 Thread Lucian Branescu
Thanks. Rebasing to 2.28 shouldn't be that hard, but 2.30 has had major API changes, so it would have to be ported. For now we've left Browse PDF support for later since we're having a lot of trouble getting anything working in the first place (pywebkitgtk issues, no libsoup python binding, etc.)

Re: [Sugar-devel] Retro resource management game, anyone remember?

2010-07-25 Thread Lucian Branescu
Globulation 2 is a currently maintained project and offers a nice take on resource management. http://globulation2.org/wiki/Main_Page On 25 July 2010 18:37, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: El Sun, 25-07-2010 a las 02:25 +0100, Gary C Martin escribió: Anyone else remember this? I

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Browse-webkit] Changing its bundle_id

2010-07-23 Thread Lucian Branescu
I've rebranded Browse-webkit to Surf-115. http://people.sugarlabs.org/lucian/Surf-115.xo On 22 July 2010 19:03, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: I was planning to simply pretend that Browse-webkit is a newer version of Surf. In a way it is, since they share some ancient git

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Testing request] Browse-webkit

2010-07-22 Thread Lucian Branescu
wrote: On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: El Tue, 20-07-2010 a las 03:07 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribió: rgs and myself have ported Browse to pywebkitgtk with all features and we could use some testing. You can get it from here http://git.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Browse: Add support for creating multiple tabs

2010-07-22 Thread Lucian Branescu
Could you please attach a patch against mainline master HEAD? (not inline in the email) Also, does it still crash? On 1 July 2010 21:02, anishmangal2002 anishmangal2...@gmail.com wrote: This patch adds support to create multiple tabbed windows in Browse. A tab may be added by either clicking

[Sugar-devel] [Browse-webkit] Changing its bundle_id

2010-07-22 Thread Lucian Branescu
In order to better test Browse-webkit, we'd need to package and distribute it. However, it is plagued with dependency issues. It requires pywebkitgtk 1.1.6 and webkitgtk 1.1.7, which aren't an option on fedora 11 without breaking other things. pywebkitgtk has a bug

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Browse-webkit] Changing its bundle_id

2010-07-22 Thread Lucian Branescu
If bobbyp agrees, I'll rebrand it to Surf until it gets merged to master. Would that be ok? On 22 July 2010 17:24, Benjamin M. Schwartz bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: On 07/22/2010 12:18 PM, Lucian Branescu wrote: In order to better test Browse-webkit, we'd need to package and distribute

Re: [Sugar-devel] Changing bundle_id and version scheme for Etoys

2010-07-22 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 22 July 2010 17:49, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 22.07.2010, at 12:18, Lucian Branescu wrote: I was thinking of changing the bundle_id of Browse-webkit from 'org.laptop.WebActivity' to 'org.sugarlabs.WebActivity', to allow both Browse to be installed and working

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Browse-webkit] Changing its bundle_id

2010-07-22 Thread Lucian Branescu
...@googlemail.com wrote: On 22 Jul 2010, at 17:26, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: If bobbyp agrees, I'll rebrand it to Surf until it gets merged to master. Would that be ok? Need a new svg icon, temp or otherwise? Happy to cook something up, similar to the old surf svg involving

Re: [Sugar-devel] Read/evince quick follow up

2010-07-20 Thread Lucian Branescu
I've implemented copy and search. There may still be some loose ends somewhere and I haven't tested epubs at all. On 20 July 2010 05:24, Gary C Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Lucian, Fab thanks. A git clone of your http://git.sugarlabs.org/git/read/evince-2-30.git now does the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Read/evince quick follow up

2010-07-20 Thread Lucian Branescu
Another feature that doesn't work is Table of Contents for pdfs that have it. On 20 July 2010 15:00, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: I've implemented copy and search. There may still be some loose ends somewhere and I haven't tested epubs at all. On 20 July 2010 05:24, Gary C

Re: [Sugar-devel] Read/evince quick follow up

2010-07-20 Thread Lucian Branescu
I've enabled epub view. It requires both python-lxml and python-BeautifulSoup installed (for some reason) and none of the toolbars work in epub view. On 20 July 2010 16:51, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: Another feature that doesn't work is Table of Contents for pdfs that have

[Sugar-devel] [Testing request] Browse-webkit

2010-07-19 Thread Lucian Branescu
rgs and myself have ported Browse to pywebkitgtk with all features and we could use some testing. You can get it from here http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/mainline/trees/webkit It requires pywebkitgtk 1.1.6 and webkitgtk 1.2.*. Also, note that pywebkitgtk 1.1.6 in fedora (11 and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse owner

2010-07-18 Thread Lucian Branescu
Silbe and I are Browse maintainers now. So if erikos is ok with it, you can pass ownership to either one of us. On 18 July 2010 11:12, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: Hello erikos, you're still marked the owner of the Browse project on git.sugarlabs.org. If you don't mind, I'll

[Sugar-devel] [Browse] PDFs inline

2010-07-18 Thread Lucian Branescu
I've seen your merge request on http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/inline-pdf. Since I've been working on Browse-webkit, I'd like to implement inline PDFs for it as well. However, evince maintainers are very hostile to browser plugins, NPAPI or otherwise

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Browse] PDFs inline

2010-07-18 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 18 July 2010 18:54, Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: I've seen your merge request on http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/inline-pdf. Since I've been working on Browse-webkit, I'd like

Re: [Sugar-devel] Design Team meeting (was: Re: UI experiments: pop-up menus and hot corners)

2010-07-08 Thread Lucian Branescu
I'd like to add to that list: - Saving web pages from browse/SSBs If there's time, I'd like some designers' opinion on how it should look. On 8 July 2010 11:49, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Gary Martin's message of Thu Jul 08 09:13:23 + 2010: It

Re: [Sugar-devel] Patches to mail list, or patches to trac?

2010-07-06 Thread Lucian Branescu
I was thinking that google groups deals great with two views on the same discussion (forum-like comments and ml). Could something like that be done for trac? Would it be a good idea? On 6 July 2010 09:07, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 07/05/2010 02:47 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Browse: Add support for creating multiple tabs

2010-06-29 Thread Lucian Branescu
I'm not sure it's a good idea to merge this if it causes Browse (vital app) to occasionally crash on SoaS (very popular Sugar environment). At the very least, the tabs feature should be disabled if that certain version of cairo is detected. Also, it would be more convenient if you put your work

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RFC] Better disk format for journal entries

2010-06-27 Thread Lucian Branescu
I think it would be very useful if the datastore were less opaque to regular tools. Especially as a developer, I find the Journal sometimes gets in the way and going around it should be easier. Related to the Gnome thread, this sort of work might help in making Sugar impervious to Gnome damage,

Re: [Sugar-devel] MP3 to ogg converter

2010-06-26 Thread Lucian Branescu
Keep in mind that mp3 already is a lossy codec. If you convert from mp3 to ogg, you'll be losing a lot of quality. Usually you should only convert from a lossless coded (like flac) to a lossy one (mp3/ogg). I think you can try mencoder to encode between mp3 and ogg. On 26 June 2010 09:28, javed

Re: [Sugar-devel] JavaScript on OLPC

2010-06-25 Thread Lucian Branescu
Newer versions of Browse have support for tabs, but there is no UI element to create more tabs. However, windows created from JavaScript will appear as tabs. Not sure about alert, you might just have a really old Browse. What version is it? On 25 June 2010 19:32, Dan Healy dfhe...@gmail.com

Re: [Sugar-devel] A Tale of Sugar and Pippy

2010-06-22 Thread Lucian Branescu
I think all activities should have Report bug on the toolbar somewhere. And of course a system in place on the other end, perhaps email-to-trac? On 22 June 2010 14:25, Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:07:50PM +1000, James Cameron wrote: On Tue, Jun 22,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Sugar-Devel] Sugar Web Engine

2010-06-18 Thread Lucian Branescu
features to work with pywebkitgtk. I've also looked at webkitgtk+'s API and I'm confident that switching to PyGI will be quite easy, mostly just renaming things. On 16 June 2010 11:48, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, that doesn't solve any of my problems. I would gladly

Re: [Sugar-devel] depending on introspection

2010-06-18 Thread Lucian Branescu
The way I see it, activities can't really use PyGI until it's a sugar dependency. The sooner it is available as a dependency on all relevant platforms (debian being one of them), the sooner important things like Browse can start using it. So, how about making some packages for all relevant

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Sugar-Devel] Sugar Web Engine

2010-06-16 Thread Lucian Branescu
to write. I will give it a few more days, but if I can't figure out a clean way to wrab both hulahop and pywebkitgtk I'll drop hulahop entirely and let any future switching back to hulahop rely on git. On 16 Jun 2010 11:07, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 15:33, Lucian

Re: [Sugar-devel] depending on introspection

2010-06-16 Thread Lucian Branescu
+1 PyGI as a working dependency would make Browse work somewhat easier and would assure Browse's future. On 16 June 2010 10:27, Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.viz...@collabora.co.uk wrote: Hi, anybody has thoughts about the convenience (or not) of making Sugar depend on the introspection stack in GNOME

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.

2010-06-10 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 10 June 2010 04:28, Jameson Quinn jameson.qu...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/6/9 Luke Faraone l...@faraone.cc -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/09/2010 08:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: As far as I know, Browse is still the only hulahop user on this planet, so it's not

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.

2010-06-09 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 8 June 2010 05:54, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote: Hi folks, Under the temporary working hypothesis that we want to make a Sugar release in a couple of months, I'd like to know more about what we might find ourselves integrating. Here's my current list of, er... mostly unvetted

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.

2010-06-09 Thread Lucian Branescu
and a few utility functions, but very little is added to the base WebView classes. On 10 June 2010 01:11, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: El Wed, 09-06-2010 a las 13:30 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribió: After some debate on what exactly I should be doing, I've decided that it's both prudent

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Sugar-Devel] Sugar Web Engine

2010-06-08 Thread Lucian Branescu
On 8 June 2010 15:01, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Luncian, On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: I've received even less feedback from upstreams about their respective engines. There are still 2 issues: 1) Mozilla have given up

Re: [Sugar-devel] ANNOUNCE: Sugar 0.88 for the XO-1

2010-06-08 Thread Lucian Branescu
I'm not sure what this is and I don't really have the time to look into it atm. Browse is in a difficult situation because hulahop, pywebkitgtk and webkitgtk+PyGI all have hazy futures. Over the summer I'll try and get Browse in a better situation (the plan so far is a thin abstraction layer).

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Sugar-Devel] Sugar Web Engine

2010-06-06 Thread Lucian Branescu
with SSB features in time for GSoC that also has a clear enough future. On 31 May 2010 13:41, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: Since I got little feedback about the time, there will be a meeting in #sugar-meeting at 3PM GMT On 31 May 2010 10:09, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Striking Activity for XO 1.0 (Peru)

2010-06-03 Thread Lucian Branescu
Physics is amazing. On 3 Jun 2010 16:27, Hernan Pachas hernan.pac...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all I have a consultation, we need a striking activity to install in the XO. That is striking? That calls the visual attention of the persons who look at the XO. Do you can please, send a list of

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Sugar-Devel] Sugar Web Engine

2010-05-31 Thread Lucian Branescu
Since I got little feedback about the time, there will be a meeting in #sugar-meeting at 3PM GMT On 31 May 2010 10:09, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:58, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: In case you don't already know, I'm doing a GSoC

Re: [Sugar-devel] hulahop

2010-05-29 Thread Lucian Branescu
Yes, you can access the DOM from python. Google for extra info. If you can't find anything, I did something similar in my last year's project, which you can find here http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/lucians-ssb/trees/master Look at usercode.py On 29 May 2010 11:26, Stefan George

[Sugar-devel] [Sugar-Devel] Sugar Web Engine

2010-05-29 Thread Lucian Branescu
In case you don't already know, I'm doing a GSoC project on improving the browser engine situation in Sugar http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2010/AbstractBrowser My exams haven't finished yet (last one on Wednesday), so before I start working, I want the opinion of people that use web

Re: [Sugar-devel] Did someone say Webkit?

2010-04-27 Thread Lucian Branescu
I plan to use current hulahop/pywebkitgtk to start out since there's less to figure out. Since it's an abstraction layer, the backends can be switched later. I need a lot of feedback on what the abstraction layer itself needs to do. Afaik, only Browse and Read use browser engines so far. And then

Re: [Sugar-devel] Did someone say Webkit?

2010-04-26 Thread Lucian Branescu
wrote: On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 18:07 +0100, Lucian Branescu wrote: My GSoC project involves building an abstraction layer above pywebkitgtk/hulahop (wiki/AbstractBrowser). While the project itself isn't related, this abstraction layer and one of it's lower layers (i.e. pywebkitgtk) would become

Re: [Sugar-devel] Did someone say Webkit?

2010-04-26 Thread Lucian Branescu
, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: There already is a mostly complete pywebkitgtk activity, Surf. There has been a lot of debate on whether webkit is better than gecko for our purposes. I also plan to only support what is reasonably easy to support and let

Re: [Sugar-devel] Did someone say Webkit?

2010-04-26 Thread Lucian Branescu
, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: There already is a mostly complete pywebkitgtk activity, Surf. There has been a lot of debate on whether webkit is better than gecko for our purposes. I also plan to only support what is reasonably easy to support and let

Re: [Sugar-devel] Did someone say Webkit?

2010-04-26 Thread Lucian Branescu
, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: There already is a mostly complete pywebkitgtk activity, Surf. There has been a lot of debate on whether webkit is better than gecko for our purposes. I also plan to only support what is reasonably easy to support and let

  1   2   3   >