This email is long overdue.
As you might have noticed, I haven't contributed to Browse/Sugar in a
long time. It was partly frustration with the technologies
(GTK3/introspection migration, I hate you), partly lack of money; but
mostly it was lack of spare time.
I still don't have any more free
Surf is simply not ready, and broken in many ways. I haven't had time
to work on it, or Browse for that matter.
Also, a fully working Surf requires moving to pygobject-introspection
(in the whole of sugar-toolkit), which might require moving to gtk3 as
well.
On 16 September 2011 04:28, Thomas C
It's likely that those libraries already exist on your machine, but
with slightly different names. You could install them, too.
Try making symlinks in the chromium dir to the real libs.
On 10 August 2011 10:23, Basanta Shrestha basanta.shres...@olenepal.org wrote:
Hi,
I am looking to install
On 22 June 2011 12:54, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote:
On 21 June 2011 23:23, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2. In order to get Browse, Help and Wikipedia up and running on
webkit, do you see the need for a hulahop equivalent? Or some kind of
sugar-level web widget
On 24 June 2011 14:10, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 24 June 2011 13:08, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
Just nitpicking, but gtk2/pygi is a perfectly good option as well, and
it may even work with sugar-toolkit (depending on the status of
python-gobject and sugar
On 24 June 2011 15:13, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote:
On 24 Jun 2011, at 13:08, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to see a lot of experimentation with html activities
outside the platform before we even consider integrating. There is
just too much
On 14 June 2011 20:58, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2. What is the state of Surf?
This is the existing webkit-based browser for Sugar. Does it work
well? Is it reliable? What are the gaping holes?
It works reasonably well. I couldn't implement cookies for example,
because that requires
Looks good, although it'd be nice at some point for Sugar itself to
manage force closes better.
Wouldn't it be better if I gave you commit rights on mainline instead?
On 23 May 2011 16:30, Rafael Ortiz raf...@activitycentral.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Sascha Silbe
I gave you commit and review rights. Feel free to commit the two
patches yourself, removing me as a bottleneck.
On 23 May 2011 17:14, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks good, although it'd be nice at some point for Sugar itself to
manage force closes better.
Wouldn't
On 23 May 2011 17:46, Rafael Ortiz raf...@activitycentral.com wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I gave you commit and review rights. Feel free to commit the two
patches yourself, removing me as a bottleneck.
Ok Thanks Lucian, about
On 18 May 2011 16:00, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Art Hunkins abhun...@uncg.edu wrote:
Yes, this is particularly crucial as there is no Browse in 0.92 Sugar.
(I
On 28 March 2011 23:01, Anish Mangal an...@activitycentral.org wrote:
Hi,
With time, as hardware gets more complex, software gets bloated up to
use the excess processor cycles available. A part of it is the
websites that get more content heavy, bulky and slow with time.
Considering that the
On 17 March 2011 16:45, Mike Rehner babareh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a retired computer science teacher with a limited amount of python
experience. About a month and a half ago I decided to volunteer about 8-12
hours a week of time to Sugar Labs. Unfortunately Sugar Labs is using a
software
I've reopened the ticket, feel free to post this log there.
I'll have a look.
On Wednesday, 23 February 2011 at 14:01, Daniel Castelo wrote:
We have some problems using browse activity V120. We can't download files
attached in gmail (apparently happen with many sites)
The activity doesn't
Thanks a lot for finding the time to do this, I've been much more busy
than anyone should be lately. It even took me 10 days to reply to this
:)
On 5 December 2010 12:41, Sascha Silbe sascha-...@silbe.org wrote:
From: Lucian Branescu Mihaila lucian.brane...@gmail.com
PDFs are working fine
On 24 November 2010 17:52, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
Saw this and instantly thought of Sugar being rendered in a browser.
http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2010/11/23/gtk3-vs-html5/
Looks interesting. Solutions like this would help to deprecate X11.
Although for Sugar in a browser, you'd
On 22 November 2010 12:02, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 11/22/2010 03:04 AM, Martin Dengler wrote:
I propose we eliminate co-maintainers from Glucose[1] because they
reduce the responsibility and pressure of a sole maintainer.
I see it the other way around. Reducing the
It's up to xulrunner (gecko) to support audio. What version of
xulrunner are you using?On Sunday, 21 November 2010 at 09:36, javed khan
wrote:i checked the html5 audio tag but it is not working, any patch for it___
Sugar-devel mailing
On 11 November 2010 16:40, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 10/25/2010 10:36 AM, Lucian Branescu wrote:
On 25 October 2010 09:25, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 10/25/2010 09:31 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 06:51:15PM -0400, Lucian
On 25 October 2010 09:25, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 10/25/2010 09:31 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 06:51:15PM -0400, Lucian Branescu Mihaila wrote:
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-120.tar.bz2
Please push a tag
On 19 October 2010 17:50, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Hi,
for personal reasons have to drastically reduce my involvement in the project.
Will be leaving maintenance of my modules and unsubscribing from the
mailing lists. My place on the board is vacant from now on and I'll be
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-120.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Release 120 (Lucian Branescu Mihaila)
* fix error writing file if there are not a url in the location bar (Gonzalo
Odiard)
* Fix OLPC #6874 - Web activity uses gettext on file name
On 22 October 2010 12:05, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Lucien:
I have added the patches to http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10364
Can you review it?
Patch looks good, but it makes the toolbar extremely crowded. I'll
accept it for now, with the caveat of having a Browse toolbar overhaul
On 22 October 2010 12:44, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 22 October 2010 12:05, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Lucien:
I have added the patches to http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10364
2010/10/19 NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu:
You could just make the new tab show the home url by default.
It already does.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 15 October 2010 17:15, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 10/15/2010 12:30 AM, Lucian Branescu Mihaila wrote:
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-119.tar.bz2
== News ==
This is a bugfix release.
* Release 119 (Lucian Branescu
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-119.tar.bz2
== News ==
This is a bugfix release.
* Release 119 (Lucian Branescu Mihaila)
* generate preview image for downloaded images (SL#1106) (Gonzalo Odiard)
* Fix history on resume. The code is a bit hacky
On 14 October 2010 19:47, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Gonzalo,
On 5 Oct 2010, at 20:32, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Gary:
Here are the screenshots.
I comented a check of cairo version to add the tabs button.
toolbar-browse-0.90.png and toolbar-browse-0.84.png are with the
On 14 October 2010 09:38, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote:
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Wed Oct 13 12:45:09 +0200 2010:
when working on the issue in Read that the dpad keys do not work
directly when in ebook mode [1], I postulated that Read when it comes
On 9 October 2010 14:01, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote:
Excerpts from Lucian Branescu's message of Tue Sep 28 22:34:01 +0200 2010:
Epub support is not complete, you can see epubs, but none of the
toolbars work. [...]
FWIW, I'd much rather see a working, but
On 9 October 2010 15:28, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 14:08 +0100, Lucian Branescu wrote:
Who is the Read maintainer these days? AUTHORS still says Sayamindu,
but AIUI he stopped working on Sugar stuff.
Then I could probably use commit rights on Read
On 7 October 2010 21:54, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Ticket with the start of implementation:
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2425
Gonzalo
I'm not sure which way would be best, but I would choose either a very
simple solution (just dotted numbers, no alphanumerics) or a
On 6 October 2010 14:20, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote:
Excerpts from simon's message of Wed Oct 06 13:57:20 +0200 2010:
see as well #2291 for more info. This one is important for 0.90.
A bit more background information would be nice. A one-line summary
of the
On 6 October 2010 14:31, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 10/06/2010 03:23 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 10/06/2010 03:20 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from simon's message of Wed Oct 06 13:57:20 +0200 2010:
see as well #2291 for more info. This one is important for 0.90.
On 6 October 2010 20:19, Sascha Silbe si...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
[Moving this to sugar-devel as I don't see any need to keep it private]
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Oct 05 14:58:24 +0200 2010:
#1106 Browse: No preview in Journal for downloaded image
On 29 September 2010 14:08, Gabriel Eirea gei...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:
I'm replying to the list for more feedback. Please see below.
2010/9/29 Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com:
On 29 September 2010 13:24, Gabriel Eirea gei...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lucian:
I've seen you are actively
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-118.tar.bz2
== News ==
Mostly just translations.
* Release 118 (Lucian Branescu Mihaila)
* Commit from Sugar Labs: Translation System by user mschlager.: 29 of 30
messages translated (0 fuzzy). (Pootle daemon
On 28 September 2010 21:26, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 09/28/2010 10:14 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 28 21:00:22 +0200
2010:
Ok, Lucian just explained me the rationale behind the Fedora version.
Version 79 is coming from the
On 6 September 2010 15:25, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
Hi,
I can well imagine there had been several discussions about this before,
even so a quick search of the archives did not reveal something:
Deployment(s) have been asking how to go back to the home page (OLPC start
On 6 September 2010 16:53, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 06.09.2010, at 17:50, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 06 16:25:03 +0200 2010:
I would say, adding a button that brings you back to the defined default
page would be a good
You can't customise it, but you can offer a document to be viewed alongside
the python source. Check how Browse does it.
On 30 Aug 2010 22:13, Erik Blankinship er...@mediamods.com wrote:
How do you customize what is shown when view source is selected for an
activity?
On 25 August 2010 15:23, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
Hi,
raised during the review of [1] some code was relying on Python 2.6
(with open(COUNTRY_CODES_PATH) as codes_file:).
Is it sane to switch to this Python version for the Sugar platform? More
readings on what is new in
On 25 August 2010 19:44, samir menon menon.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have hearing a lot about Google Summer of Code on the mailing list
(specifically,, Dinko Galetic's project!) What happens when they finish
their project? Do the projects (read: Dinko's project) get submitted as a
patch for
On 18 August 2010 03:06, Christoph Derndorfer
christoph.derndor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com
wrote:
Afaict, this isn't a bug in Browse, but in sugar.activity.Activity. I
also can't find any evidence in the logs
On 15 August 2010 05:19, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Sat, 14-08-2010 a las 12:28 +0200, Sascha Silbe escribió:
Hi!
Would anyone dislike me calling myself senior developer and system
administrator at Sugar Labs in my CV or consider it inappropriate? If
so, what other
On 15 August 2010 15:38, u...@dev.seeta.in wrote:
HI all,
When we start sugar-emulator in ubuntu , The title text in emulator window
shows [Xephyr on 30.0].Now , after going through code and other resources
what i deducted is that Xephyr is window/session manager which we uses to
run sugar
On 14 August 2010 07:01, Tabitha Roder tabi...@tabitha.net.nz wrote:
On 12/08/2010, Christoph Derndorfer christoph.derndor...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, submitted the bug which should hit Sascha Silbe's inbox for moderation
right about now.
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2155
We have this
is it?
Sugar 0.88
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com
wrote:
This exception doesn't seem related to the cairo bug. I'll try to
reproduce it on my XO. Please file a bug report if you haven't
already.
Should I file the bug with Sugar Labs or OLPC?
Sugar Labs http
This exception doesn't seem related to the cairo bug. I'll try to
reproduce it on my XO. Please file a bug report if you haven't
already.
Cairo version:
cairo-1.8.8-1.fc11.i586
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gobject/__init__.py, line
108,
Yes, it is a bug.
It has been observed that under certain versions of cairo, Browse with tabs
crashes. V115 checks for this and disables tabs if such a version is
detected. It's possible that other versions of cairo are problematic, too.
Please attach Browse's log and report your cairo version,
On 9 August 2010 11:25, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 09.08.2010, at 01:21, John Gilmore wrote:
As long as activities are saving and restoring properly it could be
made pretty much transparent to the user. Of course that's easier
said then done...
Android has a whole
On 9 August 2010 14:44, NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu wrote:
Sugar has a similar mechanism. From the Low-level Activity API docs:
org.laptop.Activity.SetActive(b: active)
Activate or passivate an activity. This is sent when switching activities,
there is only one active activity at a time,
On 8 August 2010 20:33, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote:
On 8 Aug 2010, at 18:40, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
The idea of killing activities with the content closed seems ok but it would
probably be a good idea to have a way to opt out of it for some apps. I'm
On 8 August 2010 20:51, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote:
On 8 Aug 2010, at 20:38, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
Imo a confirmation popup would become annoying very quickly. Also if the
user refuses, the kernel will have soon to kill an activity, which is worst
Bugfix release, adds a missing tab icon.
Please test this and report back any issues with tabs, from functionality to
design.
Note: tabs will disable themselves if you have a version of cairo that would
crash Browse.
== Source ==
- keyboard shortcuts for back/forward/reload
- add CAcert
- user-visible tab support. Note that the tab support will disable itself if it
detects cairo v = 1.08.10
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-116.tar.bz2
On 27 July 2010 23:57, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 18:21 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
This is a nicely decentralized mechanism for choosing identifiers
which are guaranteed by construction never to conflict.
It is indeed a simple and nice scheme, but
Thanks. Rebasing to 2.28 shouldn't be that hard, but 2.30 has had
major API changes, so it would have to be ported.
For now we've left Browse PDF support for later since we're having a
lot of trouble getting anything working in the first place
(pywebkitgtk issues, no libsoup python binding, etc.)
Globulation 2 is a currently maintained project and offers a nice take
on resource management.
http://globulation2.org/wiki/Main_Page
On 25 July 2010 18:37, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Sun, 25-07-2010 a las 02:25 +0100, Gary C Martin escribió:
Anyone else remember this?
I
I've rebranded Browse-webkit to Surf-115.
http://people.sugarlabs.org/lucian/Surf-115.xo
On 22 July 2010 19:03, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I was planning to simply pretend that Browse-webkit is a newer version
of Surf. In a way it is, since they share some ancient git
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Tue, 20-07-2010 a las 03:07 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribió:
rgs and myself have ported Browse to pywebkitgtk with all features and
we could use some testing.
You can get it from here
http://git.sugarlabs.org
Could you please attach a patch against mainline master HEAD? (not
inline in the email)
Also, does it still crash?
On 1 July 2010 21:02, anishmangal2002 anishmangal2...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds support to create multiple tabbed windows
in Browse. A tab may be added by either clicking
In order to better test Browse-webkit, we'd need to package and distribute it.
However, it is plagued with dependency issues. It requires pywebkitgtk
1.1.6 and webkitgtk 1.1.7, which aren't an option on fedora 11 without
breaking other things. pywebkitgtk has a bug
If bobbyp agrees, I'll rebrand it to Surf until it gets merged to
master. Would that be ok?
On 22 July 2010 17:24, Benjamin M. Schwartz bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
On 07/22/2010 12:18 PM, Lucian Branescu wrote:
In order to better test Browse-webkit, we'd need to package and distribute
On 22 July 2010 17:49, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 22.07.2010, at 12:18, Lucian Branescu wrote:
I was thinking of changing
the bundle_id of Browse-webkit from 'org.laptop.WebActivity' to
'org.sugarlabs.WebActivity', to allow both Browse to be installed and
working
...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 22 Jul 2010, at 17:26, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
If bobbyp agrees, I'll rebrand it to Surf until it gets merged to
master. Would that be ok?
Need a new svg icon, temp or otherwise? Happy to cook something up, similar
to the old surf svg involving
I've implemented copy and search. There may still be some loose ends
somewhere and I haven't tested epubs at all.
On 20 July 2010 05:24, Gary C Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Lucian,
Fab thanks. A git clone of your
http://git.sugarlabs.org/git/read/evince-2-30.git now does the
Another feature that doesn't work is Table of Contents for pdfs that have it.
On 20 July 2010 15:00, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I've implemented copy and search. There may still be some loose ends
somewhere and I haven't tested epubs at all.
On 20 July 2010 05:24, Gary C
I've enabled epub view. It requires both python-lxml and
python-BeautifulSoup installed (for some reason) and none of the
toolbars work in epub view.
On 20 July 2010 16:51, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
Another feature that doesn't work is Table of Contents for pdfs that have
rgs and myself have ported Browse to pywebkitgtk with all features and
we could use some testing.
You can get it from here
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/mainline/trees/webkit
It requires pywebkitgtk 1.1.6 and webkitgtk 1.2.*.
Also, note that pywebkitgtk 1.1.6 in fedora (11 and
Silbe and I are Browse maintainers now. So if erikos is ok with it,
you can pass ownership to either one of us.
On 18 July 2010 11:12, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Hello erikos,
you're still marked the owner of the Browse project on
git.sugarlabs.org.
If you don't mind, I'll
I've seen your merge request on
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/inline-pdf.
Since I've been working on Browse-webkit, I'd like to implement inline
PDFs for it as well. However, evince maintainers are very hostile to
browser plugins, NPAPI or otherwise
On 18 July 2010 18:54, Sayamindu Dasgupta sayami...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen your merge request on
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/inline-pdf.
Since I've been working on Browse-webkit, I'd like
I'd like to add to that list:
- Saving web pages from browse/SSBs
If there's time, I'd like some designers' opinion on how it should look.
On 8 July 2010 11:49, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
Excerpts from Gary Martin's message of Thu Jul 08 09:13:23 + 2010:
It
I was thinking that google groups deals great with two views on the
same discussion (forum-like comments and ml). Could something like
that be done for trac? Would it be a good idea?
On 6 July 2010 09:07, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 07/05/2010 02:47 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On
I'm not sure it's a good idea to merge this if it causes Browse (vital
app) to occasionally crash on SoaS (very popular Sugar environment).
At the very least, the tabs feature should be disabled if that certain
version of cairo is detected.
Also, it would be more convenient if you put your work
I think it would be very useful if the datastore were less opaque to
regular tools. Especially as a developer, I find the Journal sometimes
gets in the way and going around it should be easier.
Related to the Gnome thread, this sort of work might help in making
Sugar impervious to Gnome damage,
Keep in mind that mp3 already is a lossy codec. If you convert from
mp3 to ogg, you'll be losing a lot of quality. Usually you should only
convert from a lossless coded (like flac) to a lossy one (mp3/ogg).
I think you can try mencoder to encode between mp3 and ogg.
On 26 June 2010 09:28, javed
Newer versions of Browse have support for tabs, but there is no UI
element to create more tabs. However, windows created from JavaScript
will appear as tabs.
Not sure about alert, you might just have a really old Browse. What
version is it?
On 25 June 2010 19:32, Dan Healy dfhe...@gmail.com
I think all activities should have Report bug on the toolbar
somewhere. And of course a system in place on the other end, perhaps
email-to-trac?
On 22 June 2010 14:25, Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:07:50PM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22,
features to work with pywebkitgtk.
I've also looked at webkitgtk+'s API and I'm confident that switching
to PyGI will be quite easy, mostly just renaming things.
On 16 June 2010 11:48, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, that doesn't solve any of my problems.
I would gladly
The way I see it, activities can't really use PyGI until it's a sugar
dependency. The sooner it is available as a dependency on all relevant
platforms (debian being one of them), the sooner important things like
Browse can start using it.
So, how about making some packages for all relevant
to write. I will give it a few more days, but
if I can't figure out a clean way to wrab both hulahop and pywebkitgtk I'll
drop hulahop entirely and let any future switching back to hulahop rely on
git.
On 16 Jun 2010 11:07, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 15:33, Lucian
+1
PyGI as a working dependency would make Browse work somewhat easier
and would assure Browse's future.
On 16 June 2010 10:27, Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.viz...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
anybody has thoughts about the convenience (or not) of making Sugar
depend on the introspection stack in GNOME
On 10 June 2010 04:28, Jameson Quinn jameson.qu...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/9 Luke Faraone l...@faraone.cc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/09/2010 08:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
As far as I know, Browse is still the only hulahop user on this planet,
so it's not
On 8 June 2010 05:54, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi folks,
Under the temporary working hypothesis that we want to make a Sugar release in
a couple of months, I'd like to know more about what we might find ourselves
integrating. Here's my current list of, er... mostly unvetted
and a
few utility functions, but very little is added to the base WebView
classes.
On 10 June 2010 01:11, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Wed, 09-06-2010 a las 13:30 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribió:
After some debate on what exactly I should be doing, I've decided that
it's both prudent
On 8 June 2010 15:01, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luncian,
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I've received even less feedback from upstreams about their respective
engines.
There are still 2 issues:
1) Mozilla have given up
I'm not sure what this is and I don't really have the time to look into it atm.
Browse is in a difficult situation because hulahop, pywebkitgtk and
webkitgtk+PyGI all have hazy futures. Over the summer I'll try and get
Browse in a better situation (the plan so far is a thin abstraction
layer).
with SSB features in time for GSoC that also has a clear enough
future.
On 31 May 2010 13:41, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
Since I got little feedback about the time, there will be a meeting in
#sugar-meeting at 3PM GMT
On 31 May 2010 10:09, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
Physics is amazing.
On 3 Jun 2010 16:27, Hernan Pachas hernan.pac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all
I have a consultation, we need a striking activity to install in the XO.
That is striking? That calls the visual attention of the persons who look
at the XO.
Do you can please, send a list of
Since I got little feedback about the time, there will be a meeting in
#sugar-meeting at 3PM GMT
On 31 May 2010 10:09, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:58, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
In case you don't already know, I'm doing a GSoC
Yes, you can access the DOM from python. Google for extra info. If you
can't find anything, I did something similar in my last year's
project, which you can find here
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/lucians-ssb/trees/master
Look at usercode.py
On 29 May 2010 11:26, Stefan George
In case you don't already know, I'm doing a GSoC project on improving
the browser engine situation in Sugar
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2010/AbstractBrowser
My exams haven't finished yet (last one on Wednesday), so before I
start working, I want the opinion of people that use web
I plan to use current hulahop/pywebkitgtk to start out since there's
less to figure out. Since it's an abstraction layer, the backends can
be switched later.
I need a lot of feedback on what the abstraction layer itself needs to
do. Afaik, only Browse and Read use browser engines so far. And then
wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 18:07 +0100, Lucian Branescu wrote:
My GSoC project involves building an abstraction layer above
pywebkitgtk/hulahop (wiki/AbstractBrowser).
While the project itself isn't related, this abstraction layer and one
of it's lower layers (i.e. pywebkitgtk) would become
, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
There already is a mostly complete pywebkitgtk activity, Surf.
There has been a lot of debate on whether webkit is better than gecko
for our purposes. I also plan to only support what is reasonably easy
to support and let
, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
There already is a mostly complete pywebkitgtk activity, Surf.
There has been a lot of debate on whether webkit is better than gecko
for our purposes. I also plan to only support what is reasonably easy
to support and let
, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
There already is a mostly complete pywebkitgtk activity, Surf.
There has been a lot of debate on whether webkit is better than gecko
for our purposes. I also plan to only support what is reasonably easy
to support and let
My GSoC project involves building an abstraction layer above
pywebkitgtk/hulahop (wiki/AbstractBrowser).
While the project itself isn't related, but this abstraction layer and
one of it's lower layers (i.e. pywebkitgtk) could become part of the
sugar toolkit.
On 25 April 2010 17:56, Sayamindu
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo