-- Forwarded message --
From: Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
To: Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:10:59 -0400
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSoC] Sugar Browser
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com
statement work on fedora as well? Kindly
give some pointers.
Regards,
VIJIT
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
2010/2/23 vijit singh vijitthetopco...@gmail.com:
Hello Tomeu,
I tried installing hulahop again as you suggested on fedora-11 and it got
be better? Kindly give some pointers
on the issue.
Regards,
VIJIT
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 18:56, Vijit Singh vi...@seeta.in wrote:
Hello Tomeu and Aleskey,
Thank you for your replies. I will test your suggestions
Hello everyone,
SocialCalc is based upon the use of hulahop.webview widget. While trying to
run socialcalc on sugar emulator running on Fedora and Ubuntu, error saying
No module hulahop was occurring. So, we tried installing hulahop on these
linux distributions.
*1. Firstly we tried with
Hello Simon,
I would support what Bert mentioned in one of his mails-
*When selecting an activity icon it would show the most recent Journal
entries and an icon to start a new instance. Fitt's law would suggest to
either pop it up close to the activity item, or put it in a predictable
place
Hello Simon,
Yes, I believe that's a good point. It's a bit confusing at times. I myself
got confused a few times in the beginning when I switched over from sugar
0.82 to 0.84 and was in a habit of clicking the activity icon at once as in
sugar 0.82.
I think a better option would be to -
1)
Hello Tomeu and all,
I just got the chance to try installing socialcalc on the sugar live cd and
I have been able to install it properly. Here is the review of the process,
might be helpful for other activities also in case anybody faces a similar
problem--
1. Actually, the error which was
Hello Walter and all,
The directory /home/olpc/Activities should be writable by user olpc.
Yes, they should be in the live cd also as they are writable in the normal
xo and the sugar emulator as well.
That would explain your trouble with installing activities. The
question remains, why was
at 23:47, vijit singh vijitthetopco...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello all,
Some of my co-developers are facing some issues running socialcalc on
sugar
live cd. A ZipExtractException is being reported in the log. I am
attaching
a photo log with this mail. Kindly give your suggestions about what could
.*
*Regards,*
*VIJIT
*
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:17 AM, vijit singh vijitthetopco...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello all,
Some of my co-developers are facing some issues running socialcalc on sugar
live cd. A ZipExtractException is being reported in the log. I am attaching
a photo log with this mail. Kindly
Hi Tomeu,
I apologize for not being able to reply to you for so long. Actually, my
mid-semester exams are currently going on and so I would be able to resume
my work only after 20th september after they get over.
Well, we are pretty much in the dark here so may be good to get a bit
more
Hello Tomeu,
It is a warning, but I don't see why you think it isn't related to the
exception.
I might be missing some point or might be unable to interpret this warning
properly.
Removing 2.4 is not enough, you need to rebuild hulahop and pyxpcom
with only 2.5 installed and try again.
Hi Tomeu,
Thanx for replying.
You still get this error if you run this?
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.6 python -c import hulahop
Well, running this command was still giving errors, I mean it didn't started
the python shell by itself, it simply ended, so in the next step I tried
Hi Tomeu,
Thank You for your reply.
#
/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/xpcom/xpt.py:72: RuntimeWarning:
tp_compare didn't return -1 or -2 for exception
I think this is due to some python C modules being compiled with a
python version and others with a different version.
Can you check?
Hi Tomeu,
#
/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/xpcom/xpt.py:72: RuntimeWarning:
tp_compare didn't return -1 or -2 for exception
I think this is due to some python C modules being compiled with a
python version and others with a different version.
I think this is a runtime warning and not
is a simple tutorial
activity made by sugarlabs. I will soon mail the details about the same.
Regards,
VIJIT
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
2009/6/19 vijit singh vijitthetopco...@gmail.com:
Hi everyone,
I am a software engineer at SEETA (http://seeta.in
properly.
Regards,
VIJIT SINGH
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
17 matches
Mail list logo
