Re: [Sugar-devel] State of Sugar (was: [sugarlabs/ajedrez-activity] Adding A Suitable License (#1))

[James Cameron]

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 07:08:43AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> Hi James and all,
> 
> let me deliberately sidetrack the issue at stake with a larger issue
> which I'm curious about: what is the current activity status of Sugar?
> 
> Since I've been unsubscribed from the list a few years ago (because my
> @laptop.org alias somehow died), I've missed a lot.  I'm aware of GSoC
> projects and of Sugarizer, but I would love to get an overview of all
> Sugar development...

I've just checked a mail server; we still have an alias b...@laptop.org
pointing at b...@altern.org.  Let me know if you don't need it.

> James Cameron  writes:
> 
> > Yes, perhaps that's what I'll do once the commit rate
> > by others falls below 10% of mine.
> 
> ... the sentence above woke me up: does it means that your commit
> activity is more than 9x the activity of *all* other contributors?

No.  Walter, Devin, Lionel and some others are heavy contributors at
the moment.

> That would not be completely surprising (or insane or unhealthy) since
> Sugar is a free software and most free softwares I know are led by the
> (heroic) effort of a single individual.
> 
> But I may misunderstand your statement.
> 
> So let me try a few questions:
> 
> - What part(s) of Sugar (including activities) is mostly active?

Over the past year, Sugarizer, Music Blocks, and the core activities.

> - Who is using/testing those active parts?

Lionel, Walter, Devin, myself, and a few others.  No feedback from
schools apart from a study in Madagascar.

> - Who is contributing to Sugar code (including activities)?

As above.

> - Who is supporting Sugar development (including Google through the
>   GSoC)?  Is the OLPC association still somehow involved?

Sugar Labs, SFC, Google, and One Laptop per Child (OLPC, Inc).

Yes.

> Sorry if those questions sound naive, I'm just trying to catch up
> and understand better the ecosystem at large.

No worries.  Good questions.

> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
>  Bastien

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] State of Sugar (was: [sugarlabs/ajedrez-activity] Adding A Suitable License (#1))

[Bastien]

Hi James and all,

let me deliberately sidetrack the issue at stake with a larger issue
which I'm curious about: what is the current activity status of Sugar?

Since I've been unsubscribed from the list a few years ago (because my
@laptop.org alias somehow died), I've missed a lot.  I'm aware of GSoC
projects and of Sugarizer, but I would love to get an overview of all
Sugar development...

James Cameron  writes:

> Yes, perhaps that's what I'll do once the commit rate
> by others falls below 10% of mine.

... the sentence above woke me up: does it means that your commit
activity is more than 9x the activity of *all* other contributors?

That would not be completely surprising (or insane or unhealthy) since
Sugar is a free software and most free softwares I know are led by the
(heroic) effort of a single individual.

But I may misunderstand your statement.

So let me try a few questions:

- What part(s) of Sugar (including activities) is mostly active?

- Who is using/testing those active parts?

- Who is contributing to Sugar code (including activities)?

- Who is supporting Sugar development (including Google through the
  GSoC)?  Is the OLPC association still somehow involved?

Sorry if those questions sound naive, I'm just trying to catch up
and understand better the ecosystem at large.

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel