On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 04:44:33AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
>
>> Sending the docs to cups-pdf for conversion and then talking to Moodle
>> for teacher review can be done via /usr/bin/lpr,
>
> But that would sidestep the Journal and prevent
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 04:44:33AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Sending the docs to cups-pdf for conversion and then talking to Moodle
for teacher review can be done via /usr/bin/lpr,
But that would sidestep the Journal and prevent review of the actual
output (i.e. what it looks like on paper,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> That sounds like a printer that students aren't allowed to use.
Correct! But may be used seldom, as a special case, prize, etc. And
teachers _are_ allowed to print -- while there's a good chance, the
computers there are all or amost all XOs
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
> On Sunday 03 May 2009 06:29:26 pm Albert Cahalan wrote:
>> Vamsi Krishna Davuluri writes:
> The priority is on sending the docs to cups-pdf for conversion and then
> talking to Moodle for teacher review. It is a good idea to have the code
>
On Sunday 03 May 2009 06:29:26 pm Albert Cahalan wrote:
> Vamsi Krishna Davuluri writes:
> > So, talking to Tomeu, we agreed that for Write and Read using
> > the gtkprint would be best as both support it as a printing API.
>
> The focus on "Write and Read" is short sighted and may lead
> to inflex
Vamsi Krishna Davuluri writes:
> So, talking to Tomeu, we agreed that for Write and Read using
> the gtkprint would be best as both support it as a printing API.
The focus on "Write and Read" is short sighted and may lead
to inflexible solutions.
> Now, the current plan is:
> 1) We do journal pr
6 matches
Mail list logo
