We could start with just expanding 'document' view source to allow
activities to offer files to be edited, like user CSS or TurtleArt
code blocks. This way, we don't have to worry about bundles (yet).
2009/7/17 Tomeu Vizoso :
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:15, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> On 07/16/200
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:15, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/16/2009 12:06 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> On 15 Jul 2009, at 17:07, Lucian Branescu wrote:
>>
>>> Here it is
>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Almanac#How_do_I_create_a_text_box_for_code_editing.3F
>>
>> Thanks Lucian,
On 07/16/2009 12:06 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 15 Jul 2009, at 17:07, Lucian Branescu wrote:
>
>> Here it is
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Almanac#How_do_I_create_a_text_box_for_code_editing.3F
>
> Thanks Lucian, I've been watching this thread from the sidelines. I
> for one
On 15 Jul 2009, at 17:07, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> Here it is
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Almanac#How_do_I_create_a_text_box_for_code_editing.3F
Thanks Lucian, I've been watching this thread from the sidelines. I
for one would LOVE the current 'view source' view to become a
Here it is
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Almanac#How_do_I_create_a_text_box_for_code_editing.3F
2009/7/15 Lucian Branescu :
> Sure, I'll put it on the wiki, then.
>
> About editing userscripts, I'll resort to overriding the default View
> Source, at least for now.
>
> 2009/7/15 To
Sure, I'll put it on the wiki, then.
About editing userscripts, I'll resort to overriding the default View
Source, at least for now.
2009/7/15 Tomeu Vizoso :
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 17:09, Lucian Branescu
> wrote:
>> Alright then. I'm unfamiliar with policies about code duplication in
>> sugar
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 17:09, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> Alright then. I'm unfamiliar with policies about code duplication in
> sugar and activity code. If duplication is ok, then my proposal is
> moot :) Ignore and move along.
Is not ok, it's bad, but avoiding code duplication has a cost that
need
Alright then. I'm unfamiliar with policies about code duplication in
sugar and activity code. If duplication is ok, then my proposal is
moot :) Ignore and move along.
2009/7/15 Tomeu Vizoso :
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 19:09, Lucian Branescu
> wrote:
>> I've attached a file with a SourceView class
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 19:09, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> I've attached a file with a SourceView class.
I'm still a bit unsure about the convenience of adding this code to
sugar-toolkit. It's quite trivial code and the API we add to
sugar-toolkit should be more or less stable (though we aren't yet
p
I'm proposing the addition of a general widget that could be used in
many places(Pippy, View Source, my Browse branch). In fact, it is
partly based on View Source code. I figured it would be a good idea to
not have all this code duplication.
For my project's needs (editing Userstyles and Userscri
On 07/13/2009 06:09 PM, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> I'm proposing the addition of sugar.graphics.sourceedit.SourceView. It
> would be similar to what can be found in jarabe.view.viewsource. Exact
> names of classes and/or module are up for debate.
>
> I'm also thinking of adding a FileView class in th
I've attached a file with a SourceView class.
I'll try to write up a FilesView class as well, since 3 of the 4
aforementioned use cases do something like this.
2009/7/13 Tomeu Vizoso :
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 18:09, Lucian Branescu
> wrote:
>> I'm proposing the addition of sugar.graphics.sourc
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 18:09, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> I'm proposing the addition of sugar.graphics.sourceedit.SourceView. It
> would be similar to what can be found in jarabe.view.viewsource. Exact
> names of classes and/or module are up for debate.
May be better if you first code your new stuff
I'm proposing the addition of sugar.graphics.sourceedit.SourceView. It
would be similar to what can be found in jarabe.view.viewsource. Exact
names of classes and/or module are up for debate.
I'm also thinking of adding a FileView class in there, but I'm not
sure about it.
I've already seen almo
14 matches
Mail list logo
