ect: Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Tech Report
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Chris Leonard
> wrote:
> > I don't think it is necessarily essential to report current status
on every
&g
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Chris Leonard
> wrote:
> > I don't think it is necessarily essential to report current status on
> every
> > language, that is tracked by the hosting L10n envirnment. I was
> suggesting
> > something much simp
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Chris Leonard wrote:
> I don't think it is necessarily essential to report current status on every
> language, that is tracked by the hosting L10n envirnment. I was suggesting
> something much simpler.
>
> Yes/No on POT generated and hosted somewhere (or other L10n
I don't think it is necessarily essential to report current status on every
language, that is tracked by the hosting L10n envirnment. I was suggesting
something much simpler.
Yes/No on POT generated and hosted somewhere (or other L10n equivalent).
A link to where L10n on the Activity is performe
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:40:44AM -0500, Chris Leonard wrote:
> It would be highly desirable for ASLO to reflect the i18n status of an
> Activity, ideally with a link to where the L10n of that activity is hosted
> (it doesn't have to be translate.sugarlabs.org). Far too many of the
> Activities h
t; > Cc: Aleksey Lim; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Tech Report
> >
> > On 13 February 2011 16:31, David Farning
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > On the content side, the New Zealand testers would be perfect fit
&g
It would be highly desirable for ASLO to reflect the i18n status of an
Activity, ideally with a link to where the L10n of that activity is hosted
(it doesn't have to be translate.sugarlabs.org). Far too many of the
Activities hosted in ASLO have not been internationalized / localized and
believe t
> -Original Message-
> From: tabitha.m...@gmail.com [mailto:tabitha.m...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Tabitha Roder
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 3:42 AM
> To: David Farning
> Cc: Aleksey Lim; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] T
On 13 February 2011 16:31, David Farning wrote:
> On the content side, the New Zealand testers would be perfect fit for
> editors. Every weekend they could go through the queue of uploaded
> activities for the week and approve the one without regressions.
>
> There would be a strong incentive for
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 01:21:10AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> This is activities.sugarlabs.org report to cover only technical
> ASLO aspects.
>
> == Roadmap ==
>
> The upstream is in process of switching to new AMO code base, django
> based (python based framework). We need to do the same. So, t
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Aleksey Lim
wrote:
> This is activities.sugarlabs.org report to cover only technical
> ASLO aspects.
>
> == ASLO maintaining ==
>
> Actually, we didn't have any explicit workflows except just coding ASLO
> patch on top of AMO code base, maintaining ASLO servers, an
This is activities.sugarlabs.org report to cover only technical
ASLO aspects.
== ASLO maintaining ==
Actually, we didn't have any explicit workflows except just coding ASLO
patch on top of AMO code base, maintaining ASLO servers, and more or
less regular approving of new activities by not many pe
12 matches
Mail list logo
