On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 08:35:03AM -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
>> It is not clear from this patch if there is a way for a deployment (or
>> individual) to disable this feature. It is unprecedented that we have
>> this level of auto-association b
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 08:35 -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
> It is not clear from this patch if there is a way for a deployment (or
> individual) to disable this feature. It is unprecedented that we have
> this level of auto-association between user and some arbitrary
> authority -- there should be a
It's worth noting that a "processor serial number" (along with any other
persistent identifier) falls under "personal information" and requires
anyone using this code that is either based in the United States or
working with children in the United States to obey the Children's Online
Privacy Protec
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 08:35:03AM -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
> It is not clear from this patch if there is a way for a deployment (or
> individual) to disable this feature. It is unprecedented that we have
> this level of auto-association between user and some arbitrary
> authority -- there shoul
It is not clear from this patch if there is a way for a deployment (or
individual) to disable this feature. It is unprecedented that we have
this level of auto-association between user and some arbitrary
authority -- there should be an opt-in policy at the deployment level
and an opt-out policy at
5 matches
Mail list logo
