On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 06:09, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 06:07 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
* as a 3rd party developer, I don't see such teachers requests listed
somewhere on wiki, that let me see what can I do and peek most
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:07, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:16:02AM +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
I strongly agree w/ tomeu on this.
Making Sugar easier to contribute to isn't anywhere near the top of the list
of requested features by our kids and teachers
On 15 Dec 2009, at 13:36, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:52:56AM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:07, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:16:02AM +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
I strongly agree w/ tomeu on this.
Making Sugar
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 06:07 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
* as a 3rd party developer, I don't see such teachers requests listed
somewhere on wiki, that let me see what can I do and peek most
interesting/suitable-for-my-skils/etc task
There's enough going around that you could work on which
On 15.12.2009, at 15:09, Daniel Drake wrote:
I believe there are still various well-known 0.86 regressions (over
0.84). For example, Record not working. These regressions are going to
be a huge headache to anyone who tries to upgrade, perhaps you could
squash a few of those.
Speaking of
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:19, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 15.12.2009, at 15:09, Daniel Drake wrote:
I believe there are still various well-known 0.86 regressions (over
0.84). For example, Record not working. These regressions are going to
be a huge headache to anyone who
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 02:01:18PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 15 Dec 2009, at 13:36, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:52:56AM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:07, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
* implementing Zero Sugar initiative, in my
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:25, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Aleksey Lim wrote:
So, I have
strong intension to switching development focus from core team,
which develops sucrose - glucose(core) and fructose(some core
activities) to wide range of developers/doers thus
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:19:51PM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:25, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Aleksey Lim wrote:
So, I have
strong intension to switching development focus from core team,
which develops sucrose - glucose(core) and
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:01, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:19:51PM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:25, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Aleksey Lim wrote:
So, I have
strong intension to switching
I for one would love to learn a new way to hack on my sugar and easily share
patches.
If we can do better than jhbuild does (user experience wise), I would love
it!
Icarito
2009/12/14 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:01, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:01:26PM -0500, Sebastian Silva wrote:
I for one would love to learn a new way to hack on my sugar and easily share
patches.
If we can do better than jhbuild does (user experience wise), I would love
it!
yeah, some day we can provide 0install glucose e.g. for testing
I strongly agree w/ tomeu on this.
Making Sugar easier to contribute to isn't anywhere near the top of the list
of requested features by our kids and teachers in Nepal.
The far and away most requested feature by teachers in Nepal is a mechanism
for kids to turn in homework. I am not talking
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:16:02AM +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
I strongly agree w/ tomeu on this.
Making Sugar easier to contribute to isn't anywhere near the top of the list
of requested features by our kids and teachers in Nepal.
The far and away most requested feature by teachers in Nepal
14 matches
Mail list logo
