On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 07:53, Elena of Valhalla
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> Oh, also users can "review" addons and rate then.
>
> But the reviews may be in languages that another user isn't able to
> read: having some easily localizable property to show is pr
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Oh, also users can "review" addons and rate then.
But the reviews may be in languages that another user isn't able to
read: having some easily localizable property to show is probably
essential.
Anyway, +1 on the idea that activities should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:58:49AM -0800, Carol Farlow Lerche wrote:
>After looking around I still can't find an automatic way to determine
>which distribution/packaging universe a machine is in. /etc/*version
>gives a somewhat useful but somewhat l
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Carol Farlow Lerche wrote:
> After looking around I still can't find an automatic way to determine which
> distribution/packaging universe a machine is in. /etc/*version gives a
> somewhat useful but somewhat lying answer on my Ubuntu platform. It seems
> an obv
After looking around I still can't find an automatic way to determine which
distribution/packaging universe a machine is in. /etc/*version gives a
somewhat useful but somewhat lying answer on my Ubuntu platform. It seems
an obvious thing to have uname report, but no go. What have I missed?
On T
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Carol Farlow Lerche wrote:
> How does the Mozilla add-on functionality decide if there is a version or
> platform conflict for browser add-ons? it must be a piece of the browser
> that does this via some interaction with data on the server. Shouldn't
> there be
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:23, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:18, Carol Farlow Lerche wrote:
>> How does the Mozilla add-on functionality decide if there is a version or
>> platform conflict for browser add-ons? it must be a piece of the browser
>> that does this via some inter
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:18, Carol Farlow Lerche wrote:
> How does the Mozilla add-on functionality decide if there is a version or
> platform conflict for browser add-ons? it must be a piece of the browser
> that does this via some interaction with data on the server. Shouldn't
> there be a s
How does the Mozilla add-on functionality decide if there is a version or
platform conflict for browser add-ons? it must be a piece of the browser
that does this via some interaction with data on the server. Shouldn't
there be a similar process here? It is frustrating to download something
(whic
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> A long time ago, when using bundles was decided as necessary, the idea
> was that there would be something called the "Sugar platform" that
> would specify every component that an activity author can rely on
> being available for their activi
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:42:16AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
Since dependancy installation is not something most children can do,
If we reach that point, we've already failed (IMO).
I meant from an administrative perspective.
-v, please?
CU Sascha
--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.inf
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote:On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:56:41PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
Since dependancy installation is not something most children can do,
If we reach that point, we've already failed (IMO).I meant from an administrative perspective. -- Luke Far
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:56:41PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
Since dependancy installation is not something most children can do,
If we reach that point, we've already failed (IMO).
CU Sascha
--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:36:18PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
The *ideal* method would be to use a standard packaging method long
term, ie
.deb (which I'm partial to) or RPM. (both of these can be converted
from and
to each other with alien)
What exactly are you refering to when you say .deb /
Luke Faraone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Carol Farlow Lerche wrote:
>
>> Why not provide a dependency declaration in the activity file which can be
>> checked when the activity is installed? It could inform the user that a
>> particular package or library was needed. I understand
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Carol Farlow Lerche wrote:
> Why not provide a dependency declaration in the activity file which can be
> checked when the activity is installed? It could inform the user that a
> particular package or library was needed. I understand that different
> distros ma
Why not provide a dependency declaration in the activity file which can be
checked when the activity is installed? It could inform the user that a
particular package or library was needed. I understand that different
distros may package the dependencies differently, but it wouldn't be so bad
if t
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> What will happen if someone download TamTam/StoryBuilder/etc,
> and unfortunately hasn't csound/pygame/etc installed?
>
> One possible decision:
> we could create meta package w/ frequently used dependencies,
> like csound/olpcsound, pygames e
18 matches
Mail list logo
