The policy is ok to me also.
Rafael Ortiz On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Aleksey Lim<alsr...@member.fsf.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 12:44:48PM -0500, David Farning wrote: >> At the end of last week I posted a draft project policy[1] on the >> mailing list. It has not received any public or private criticism. >> Unless I hear otherwise, I'll post it to the wiki tomorrow with a >> 'draft' tag. >> >> david >> >> 1. http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-August/007993.html > > +1 > > In my mind it correlates with proposing ideas to Engineering > Committee(since there wasn't clear consensus in ml thread for example) > or more, it makes redundant existing of Engineering Committee in most > cases. I mean that if there is agreement about mission statement of > proposed feature(i.e. w/o any technical details of implementation) it > will be much easier to find consensus with particular implementation. > > So, I'm waiting for final wiki page which I could use to formalize > a couple of ideas for 0.88 release cycle. > > -- > Aleksey > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > i...@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel