I volunteer as well thanks
Sean
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Samuel Klein s...@laptop.org wrote:
I volunteer. I don't have a strong opinion yet, but am interested in
the future of SoaS. When I give talks about OLPC and Sugar, there are
almost always audience members who have used it.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 15:37, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi all,
Sebastian Dziallas has asked for clarity on how the SoaS distribution
he maintains is going to be treated and considered by SL. It doesn't
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 15:37, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi all,
Sebastian Dziallas has asked for clarity on how the SoaS distribution
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 15:37, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I presume there's a defined amount of people on this panel. When and
where is the chosen panel announced?
It's being discussed right now in the SLOBS meeting in #sugar-meeting.
Oops. I seem to
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:33:45AM -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
4. We will entrust the marketing team with labeling products in a way
that is amenable to all parties, including the users and creators of
Sugar-based systems. The Marketing team is, and has been, responsible for
ensuring
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Mon, 21-09-2009 a las 10:14 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
Yes, the most obvious path is to be based on the next CentOS major
release, which in turn will be based on Fedora 11 (AFAIK).
Switching to other distros
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 06:41, Bill Bogstad bogs...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
.
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a
El Mon, 21-09-2009 a las 10:14 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
Yes, the most obvious path is to be based on the next CentOS major
release, which in turn will be based on Fedora 11 (AFAIK).
Switching to other distros with LTS is of course possible but then it
will be most probably carried out
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
As a parallel, Linux Caixa Mágica is the name for a product, Caixa
Mágica Software the name of the company behind it, and its community
is called Caixa Mágica Community. Though the community can submit
packages for
El Fri, 18-09-2009 a las 16:27 -0400, Chris Ball escribió:
Please volunteer by replying to this mail if you're interested, and
please do so by Thursday September 24th so that we can run the vote
at the Friday September 25th SLOBs meeting.
I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunteer
2009/9/20 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org:
I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunteer panel, but I'd
like to offer my viewpoint on this issue.
I agree and I also feel that we have consensus on those 2 things (SL
should promote SoaS, SL should treat distributors equally).
The
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:47, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/9/20 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org:
I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunteer panel, but I'd
like to offer my viewpoint on this issue.
I agree and I also feel that we have consensus on those 2 things
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:18:17AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc.
+1
Though you neglected to mention Debian Sugar on
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc. From time to time SLs
would decide to call and market as Sugar on a Stick a particular
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc. From time to time SLs
would decide to call and market as Sugar on a Stick a particular
release of a particular
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
.
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc. From time to time SLs
would decide
16 matches
Mail list logo
