On 09/21/2010 03:49 AM, Gary Martin wrote:
> On 20 Sep 2010, at 22:10, Sascha Silbe
> wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010:
>>
Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that
process (documented on the Development
On 09/20/2010 11:10 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010:
>
>>> Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that
>>> process (documented on the Development Team/Release [1] page on the
>>> wiki) or others as well?
On 20 Sep 2010, at 22:10, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010:
>
>>> Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that
>>> process (documented on the Development Team/Release [1] page on the
>>> wiki) or others as
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010:
> > Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that
> > process (documented on the Development Team/Release [1] page on the
> > wiki) or others as well?
>
> Ideally all of them, as (a) there are not
On 09/15/2010 04:27 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Wed Sep 15 12:33:30 +0200 2010:
>
>>> Personally I'm moving to the point where if there's not a tarball I
>>> won't spend my time packaging it.
>>
>> Yes, I think the effort for uploading a bundle that can be
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Wed Sep 15 12:33:30 +0200 2010:
> > Personally I'm moving to the point where if there's not a tarball I
> > won't spend my time packaging it.
>
> Yes, I think the effort for uploading a bundle that can be easily
> generated with the tools in sugar is n
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:38:34PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from David Farning's message of Wed Sep 15 14:28:05 +0200 2010:
>> We should not go from the git repository. Either use the .xo or a
>> tarball.
For the entire 'why' I will have to refer you to the the Debain
mailing lists.
Excerpts from David Farning's message of Wed Sep 15 14:28:05 +0200 2010:
> >> We should not go from the git repository. Either use the .xo or a tarball.
> For the entire 'why' I will have to refer you to the the Debain
> mailing lists. /me ducks The short answer is Debian packaging is
> premised
On 09/15/2010 03:22 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 07:28:05AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Sascha Silbe
>> wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200
>>> 2010:
>>>
>> In the .deb side of the univer
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 07:28:05AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200
2010:
>> In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can
>> work directly from the git rep
On 09/15/2010 11:47 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200 2010:
>
In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work
directly from the git repository.
>>
>> We should not go from the git repository. Either use the
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200 2010:
>
>> >> In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work
>> >> directly from the git repository.
>>
>> We should not go from the git repository. Ei
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:25:57AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
wrote:
Hi,
what is the current status for activity release
Hi Peter,
thanks for your feedback.
On 09/14/2010 11:19 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what is the current status for activity releases in order to include
>> them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs
On 09/14/2010 11:15 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
>>> wrote:
Hi,
what is the current status for activity re
On 09/15/2010 10:41 AM, David Farning wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
wrote:
On 09/15/2010 01:58 AM, Gary Martin wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2010, at 15:14, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
>> Thanks David and Walter for the feedback,
>>
>> On 09/14/2010 04:09 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon
Excerpts from Gary Martin's message of Wed Sep 15 01:58:07 +0200 2010:
[activity release tarballs]
> I've been uploading me since Bernie kindly un blocked my shell account,
> though I totally understand why others might not manage this workflow,
> there's already many hoops to jump though for a
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Tue Sep 14 16:14:08 +0200 2010:
> >> In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work
> >> directly from the git repository.
>
> We should not go from the git repository. Either use the .xo or a tarball.
Why? And who is "we" in this
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
>>> wrote:
Hi,
what is the current status
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> what is the current status for activity releases in order to include them
>>> in distributi
On 14 Sep 2010, at 15:14, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Thanks David and Walter for the feedback,
>
> On 09/14/2010 04:09 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
>>> wrote:
Hi,
what is
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:05:53AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
what is the current status for activity releases in order to include
them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did
you switch over to construct the
On 15.09.2010, at 00:07, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Bert Freudenberg
> wrote:
>
>> And (from your other msg) why do you want both zip (xo) and tar balls?
>
> I just want sure source code only tarfiles. I presume for a.sl.o
> there's a need for ready to run
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 14.09.2010, at 23:15, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Walter Bender
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning wrote:
In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarball
On 14.09.2010, at 23:15, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning wrote:
>>>
>>> In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work
>>> directly from the git repository.
>>
>> Is
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the current status for activity releases in order to include
> them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did you
> switch over to construct the rpms from the .xo? For example the latest
> Paint rpm use
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> what is the current status for activity releases in order to include
>>> them in distributions like Soas*
Thanks David and Walter for the feedback,
On 09/14/2010 04:09 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> what is the current status for activity releases in order to include
>>>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what is the current status for activity releases in order to include
>> them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did you
>> switch over to construct
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the current status for activity releases in order to include
> them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did you
> switch over to construct the rpms from the .xo? For example the latest
> Paint rpm uses
31 matches
Mail list logo
