After much trouble getting hulahop xpcom to work in the abstraction
layer webwrap, I've decided to drop it and focus on pywebkitgtk. To
this end, yesterday I got Browse to start and load pages with
pywebkitgtk, but with several features disabled. I'll be working on
getting all of Browse's
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 14:01, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
After much trouble getting hulahop xpcom to work in the abstraction
layer webwrap, I've decided to drop it and focus on pywebkitgtk. To
this end, yesterday I got Browse to start and load pages with
pywebkitgtk,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:01:05PM +0100, Lucian Branescu wrote:
After much trouble getting hulahop xpcom to work in the abstraction
layer webwrap, I've decided to drop it and focus on pywebkitgtk. To
this end, yesterday I got Browse to start and load pages with
pywebkitgtk, but with several
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 15:33, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I've received even less feedback from upstreams about their respective
engines.
There are still 2 issues:
1) Mozilla have given up on having xulrunner work as a distro-provided
VM and now they just bundle it..
Unfortunately, that doesn't solve any of my problems.
I would gladly drop hulahop entirely (it's a mess and very low-level), but
several people have expressed concern that gecko might be a better choice
long-term. However, I have not been able to confirm any of their performance
concerns. In my
Hi Luncian,
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I've received even less feedback from upstreams about their respective
engines.
There are still 2 issues:
1) Mozilla have given up on having xulrunner work as a distro-provided
VM and now they just
On 8 June 2010 15:01, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luncian,
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I've received even less feedback from upstreams about their respective
engines.
There are still 2 issues:
1) Mozilla have given up
I've received even less feedback from upstreams about their respective engines.
There are still 2 issues:
1) Mozilla have given up on having xulrunner work as a distro-provided
VM and now they just bundle it.. They plan some major changes to
embedding and they have no plan forward that would
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:58, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
In case you don't already know, I'm doing a GSoC project on improving
the browser engine situation in Sugar
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2010/AbstractBrowser
My exams haven't finished yet (last one
Since I got little feedback about the time, there will be a meeting in
#sugar-meeting at 3PM GMT
On 31 May 2010 10:09, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:58, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
In case you don't already know, I'm doing a GSoC
In case you don't already know, I'm doing a GSoC project on improving
the browser engine situation in Sugar
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2010/AbstractBrowser
My exams haven't finished yet (last one on Wednesday), so before I
start working, I want the opinion of people that use web
11 matches
Mail list logo
