Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Trac update

2013-06-29 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 06/28/2013 06:57 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
 Hello,
 
 we seem to have a pretty old trac version. I'm trying to improve sugar
 core bug tracking state and practices and as part of that effort I think
 it might make sense to upgrade to 1.0.

That would be great.


 Is the only reason we didn't upgrade so far lack of time? Or do we know
 about blockers?

Trac probably needs a new maintainer. Would you like to take it over or
replace it with something else?


 Is our trac configuration somewhere? I didn't find it in git.

The only documentation we have on Trac is this page:

  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Service/bugs

The production instance is located on sunjammer, in
/srv/www-sugarlabs/bugs. There's also a development environment in
bugs-devel which is accessible as http://bugs-devel.sugarlabs.org/

Before touching the production instance, you might want to try upgrading
the -devel environment to see how it goes.

Ping me on IRC if you need any help. I have vague memories of upgrading
Trac several years ago (hint: it's quite painful).

-- 
 _ // Bernie Innocenti
 \X/  http://codewiz.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Trac update

2013-06-29 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Could you add me to sugartrac? I'll give it a try on -devel and see if
there are blockers.


On 29 June 2013 13:36, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:

 On 06/28/2013 06:57 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
  Hello,
 
  we seem to have a pretty old trac version. I'm trying to improve sugar
  core bug tracking state and practices and as part of that effort I think
  it might make sense to upgrade to 1.0.

 That would be great.


  Is the only reason we didn't upgrade so far lack of time? Or do we know
  about blockers?

 Trac probably needs a new maintainer. Would you like to take it over or
 replace it with something else?


  Is our trac configuration somewhere? I didn't find it in git.

 The only documentation we have on Trac is this page:

   http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Service/bugs

 The production instance is located on sunjammer, in
 /srv/www-sugarlabs/bugs. There's also a development environment in
 bugs-devel which is accessible as http://bugs-devel.sugarlabs.org/

 Before touching the production instance, you might want to try upgrading
 the -devel environment to see how it goes.

 Ping me on IRC if you need any help. I have vague memories of upgrading
 Trac several years ago (hint: it's quite painful).

 --
  _ // Bernie Innocenti
  \X/  http://codewiz.org




-- 
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Trac update

2013-06-29 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Actually maybe on -testing, -devel seems for trunk.


On 29 June 2013 14:12, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:

 Could you add me to sugartrac? I'll give it a try on -devel and see if
 there are blockers.


 On 29 June 2013 13:36, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:

 On 06/28/2013 06:57 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
  Hello,
 
  we seem to have a pretty old trac version. I'm trying to improve sugar
  core bug tracking state and practices and as part of that effort I think
  it might make sense to upgrade to 1.0.

 That would be great.


  Is the only reason we didn't upgrade so far lack of time? Or do we know
  about blockers?

 Trac probably needs a new maintainer. Would you like to take it over or
 replace it with something else?


  Is our trac configuration somewhere? I didn't find it in git.

 The only documentation we have on Trac is this page:

   http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Service/bugs

 The production instance is located on sunjammer, in
 /srv/www-sugarlabs/bugs. There's also a development environment in
 bugs-devel which is accessible as http://bugs-devel.sugarlabs.org/

 Before touching the production instance, you might want to try upgrading
 the -devel environment to see how it goes.

 Ping me on IRC if you need any help. I have vague memories of upgrading
 Trac several years ago (hint: it's quite painful).

 --
  _ // Bernie Innocenti
  \X/  http://codewiz.org




 --
 Daniel Narvaez




-- 
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Trac update

2013-06-29 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Tried the update locally and it seems pretty painless. There are broken
permissions in the eggs and attachments directories though, the group
cannot write on some of the files. Can you either fix those up or give me
root?


On 29 June 2013 14:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:

 Actually maybe on -testing, -devel seems for trunk.


 On 29 June 2013 14:12, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:

 Could you add me to sugartrac? I'll give it a try on -devel and see if
 there are blockers.


 On 29 June 2013 13:36, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:

 On 06/28/2013 06:57 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
  Hello,
 
  we seem to have a pretty old trac version. I'm trying to improve sugar
  core bug tracking state and practices and as part of that effort I
 think
  it might make sense to upgrade to 1.0.

 That would be great.


  Is the only reason we didn't upgrade so far lack of time? Or do we know
  about blockers?

 Trac probably needs a new maintainer. Would you like to take it over or
 replace it with something else?


  Is our trac configuration somewhere? I didn't find it in git.

 The only documentation we have on Trac is this page:

   http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Service/bugs

 The production instance is located on sunjammer, in
 /srv/www-sugarlabs/bugs. There's also a development environment in
 bugs-devel which is accessible as http://bugs-devel.sugarlabs.org/

 Before touching the production instance, you might want to try upgrading
 the -devel environment to see how it goes.

 Ping me on IRC if you need any help. I have vague memories of upgrading
 Trac several years ago (hint: it's quite painful).

 --
  _ // Bernie Innocenti
  \X/  http://codewiz.org




 --
 Daniel Narvaez




 --
 Daniel Narvaez




-- 
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Trac update

2013-06-29 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 06/29/2013 09:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
 Tried the update locally and it seems pretty painless.

Awesome! For posterity, could you document the upgrade procedure in the
service page?

Also, if you'd like to support bugs.sugarlabs.org, set yourself as the
primary admin contact in the wiki. You can keep me as a secondary
although I'm trying to forget Trac as much as possible.


 There are broken
 permissions in the eggs and attachments directories though, the group
 cannot write on some of the files. Can you either fix those up or give
 me root?

Fixed the permissions _and_ gave you root. It may be that Trac has the
wrong umask when running under apache.


 On 29 June 2013 14:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
 mailto:dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Actually maybe on -testing, -devel seems for trunk.

Ok.


 On 29 June 2013 14:12, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
 mailto:dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Could you add me to sugartrac? I'll give it a try on -devel and
 see if there are blockers.

 On 29 June 2013 13:36, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
 mailto:ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
 
 On 06/28/2013 06:57 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
  Hello,
 
  we seem to have a pretty old trac version. I'm trying to
 improve sugar
  core bug tracking state and practices and as part of that
 effort I think
  it might make sense to upgrade to 1.0.
 
 That would be great.
 
 
  Is the only reason we didn't upgrade so far lack of time?
 Or do we know
  about blockers?
 
 Trac probably needs a new maintainer. Would you like to take
 it over or
 replace it with something else?
 
 
  Is our trac configuration somewhere? I didn't find it in git.
 
 The only documentation we have on Trac is this page:
 
   http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Service/bugs
 
 The production instance is located on sunjammer, in
 /srv/www-sugarlabs/bugs. There's also a development
 environment in
 bugs-devel which is accessible as
 http://bugs-devel.sugarlabs.org/
 
 Before touching the production instance, you might want to
 try upgrading
 the -devel environment to see how it goes.
 
 Ping me on IRC if you need any help. I have vague memories
 of upgrading
 Trac several years ago (hint: it's quite painful).
 
 --
  _ // Bernie Innocenti
  \X/  http://codewiz.org
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Daniel Narvaez
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Daniel Narvaez
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Daniel Narvaez
 
 
 ___
 Systems mailing list
 syst...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems
 


-- 
 _ // Bernie Innocenti
 \X/  http://codewiz.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Trac update

2013-06-29 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 29 June 2013 18:13, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:

 On 06/29/2013 09:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
  Tried the update locally and it seems pretty painless.

 Awesome! For posterity, could you document the upgrade procedure in the
 service page?


Yes


 Also, if you'd like to support bugs.sugarlabs.org, set yourself as the
 primary admin contact in the wiki. You can keep me as a secondary
 although I'm trying to forget Trac as much as possible.


Ok.



  There are broken
  permissions in the eggs and attachments directories though, the group
  cannot write on some of the files. Can you either fix those up or give
  me root?

 Fixed the permissions _and_ gave you root. It may be that Trac has the
 wrong umask when running under apache.


Thanks!
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Trac update

2013-06-29 Thread Daniel Narvaez
sudo doesn't seem to work, or am I supposed to get root in another way?


On 29 June 2013 18:44, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 29 June 2013 18:13, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:

 On 06/29/2013 09:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
  Tried the update locally and it seems pretty painless.

 Awesome! For posterity, could you document the upgrade procedure in the
 service page?


 Yes


 Also, if you'd like to support bugs.sugarlabs.org, set yourself as the
 primary admin contact in the wiki. You can keep me as a secondary
 although I'm trying to forget Trac as much as possible.


 Ok.



  There are broken
  permissions in the eggs and attachments directories though, the group
  cannot write on some of the files. Can you either fix those up or give
  me root?

 Fixed the permissions _and_ gave you root. It may be that Trac has the
 wrong umask when running under apache.


 Thanks!




-- 
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Trac update

2013-06-29 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Updated the wiki page, upgrade is pretty easy now :)

http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Service/bugs
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Trac update

2013-06-29 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 06/29/2013 01:23 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
 sudo doesn't seem to work, or am I supposed to get root in another way?

Try now, I added you to adm and admin. For historic reasons sunjammer
does not use group 'sudo', like other Ubuntu systems do.

-- 
 _ // Bernie Innocenti
 \X/  http://codewiz.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel