I went ahead and dropped jessie and raring i386 slaves.
On 24 May 2013 16:09, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Yeah I think that probably make sense. Even if someone uses i386, if stuff
> works on $DISTRO-x86_64 _and_ it works on Fedora i386, I think it's very
> very likely it will work on $DISTRO-i386
Yeah I think that probably make sense. Even if someone uses i386, if stuff
works on $DISTRO-x86_64 _and_ it works on Fedora i386, I think it's very
very likely it will work on $DISTRO-i386 too.
On 24 May 2013 15:52, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 03:49 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>
>> Hi
On 05/24/2013 03:49 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone at all is using sugar-build on i386. I suppose
everyone has x86_64 hardware these days but maybe people are still
installing i386 distros, it's the Ubuntu default for example.
It's just that maintaing i386 buildbot slaves
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone at all is using sugar-build on i386. I suppose
everyone has x86_64 hardware these days but maybe people are still
installing i386 distros, it's the Ubuntu default for example.
It's just that maintaing i386 buildbot slaves is a bit of a waste if no one
is using it. We s
4 matches
Mail list logo
