Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-24 Thread Daniel Narvaez
We are now officially supporting Fedora 19. Thanks to William Orr for the help with this. On 19 May 2013 13:49, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: I'd go for options 2 and 3 (just adding a comment in the build process warning people that building webkigtk take a *long* time. So

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-21 Thread William Orr
We have sugar-build use packages for certain packages on Fedora 19 that aren't available on Fedora 18 already (ragel, node, npm), so why not just add webkitgtk to the list as well? It makes sense enough to me, provided we're pulling a compatible version. To that end, I've already submitted a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 05/19/2013 01:41 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: Hey, It seems like building webkitgtk is a bit of a pain for many people. I would like people feedback on how bad of an obstacle it really is and about a couple of possible solutions: 1 Have buildbot generate snapshots of the base system

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-20 Thread lionel
-- Message: 7 Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 09:28:15 +0200 From: Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier? Message-ID: 5199d08f.2060...@schampijer.de Content-Type: text

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-20 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 20 May 2013 10:32, lio...@olpc-france.org wrote: So I'm not favorable to force the use of Fedora 19 that put complexity in the current process. To make it clear I'm not planning to drop F18 support until F19 is official. It might just be additional option for people that are really annoyed

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-20 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 19 May 2013 23:03, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm not have a slow computer (I think) but never can finish the compile of webkit. Once time takes 3 hours and continues compiling: 3 hours with my 2 cores at 95 ~ 100% of use!! It should be mentioned that only

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-20 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 20 May 2013 10:32, lio...@olpc-france.org wrote: Hi all, Just to give my feeling about this point. Because my PC is under Windows for professional reasons, I'm using sugar-build from a VirtualBox VM. I've recently recreated my sugar-build VM. I choose an Ubuntu 13.04 VM because no

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-20 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Btw, I think we are currently triggering a webkitgtk build after every pull, even if nothing is really changed (I blame webkitgtk stupidity for that at least partially :P). I will fix that. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-20 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2013/5/20 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: Btw, I think we are currently triggering a webkitgtk build after every pull, even if nothing is really changed (I blame webkitgtk stupidity for that at least partially :P). I will fix that. I was seeing the same :) Yes, would be nice for distro

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-19 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hey, It seems like building webkitgtk is a bit of a pain for many people. I would like people feedback on how bad of an obstacle it really is and about a couple of possible solutions: 1 Have buildbot generate snapshots of the base system dependencies which most people are unlikely to want to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-19 Thread Walter Bender
I'd go for options 2 and 3 (just adding a comment in the build process warning people that building webkigtk take a *long* time. So those who want to build it themselves will know to be patient. -walter On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, It seems

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-19 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
use webkit (but maybe someone wants to use). If instead compile it, we install as a dependency?Or the installed version is old? Regards! Alan Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 13:41:16 +0200 From: dwnarv...@gmail.com To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-19 Thread S. Daniel Francis
El may 19, 2013 6:03 p.m., Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com escribió: Hi, I'm not have a slow computer (I think) but never can finish the compile of webkit. Once time takes 3 hours and continues compiling: 3 hours with my 2 cores at 95 ~ 100% of use!! I'm tire of that and do

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-19 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
If instead compile it, we install as a dependency? Or the installed version is old? The installed version is old. The options to solve the really long building time are: using the buildbot to get pre-compiled dependencies (similar to binary snapshots, but only for non-sugar components) or

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Is webkitgtk becoming a barrier?

2013-05-19 Thread S. Daniel Francis
El may 19, 2013 7:40 p.m., Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com escribió: And package the new version for Debian based systems?? Experimental... that package could be used by your own risk in Debian Sid or Ubuntu 13.x http://packages.debian.org/experimental/libwebkit2gtk-3.0-0