On 18 April 2016 at 22:00, Tony Anderson wrote:
> OLE Nepal later converted the squeak activities to html5/javascript
> because to speed up execution and reduce the memory size of the activities.
THAT is interesting! :) Thanks!
Hi, Dave
Scratch is based on squeak. Back in the day, OLE Nepal wrote some 80
activities as part of EPaath using squeak. I suspect if you Google you
will find
descriptions for both Etoys and Scratch on writing projects in Squeak.
OLE Nepal later converted the squeak activities to
On 18 April 2016 at 16:01, Justin Overton wrote:
> Is this the correct place for the current javascript development?
> https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web
>
That's the python wrapper that allows web-platform activities to run within
a full Sugar Desktop.
There's also
> From: Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net>
> To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Active development
> Message-ID: <57145c92.2090...@usa.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> Very mu
On 18.04.2016, at 17:28, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> Hi
> I spent a lot of time yesterday reading about the history of smalltalk, and
> it seems undervalued.
>
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/search?q=squeak=all
>
On 18 April 2016 at 11:47, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Etoys is arguably a World of activities.
>
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice.
Let me put this another way: I am new to SmallTalk and it makes grand
claims, yet I can not see much real world impact.
Quoting Dave Crossland (2016-04-18 17:28:06)
> On 18 April 2016 at 00:03, Tony Anderson wrote:
>
>> Very much so. Currently the focus is writing activities using
>> javascript (sugar-web-activities). These activities work in Sugar
>> exactly as do the Python-base
Hi
On 18 April 2016 at 00:03, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Very much so. Currently the focus is writing activities using javascript
> (sugar-web-activities). These activities work in Sugar exactly as do the
> Python-base activities. They also work on Sugarizer requiring only a
Hi Justin
I was also astonished to learn that Sugar is still going last month, but
the community is pretty active still, I agree with what Tony said :)
On 18 April 2016 at 00:03, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Very much so. Currently the focus is writing activities using
Is development for sugar still active? I'm interested in writing some
activities.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
10 matches
Mail list logo