[Sugar-devel] Activity bundle format (was Re: Long-term support for Sugar)

2009-09-23 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
Bernie Innocenti wrote: A fixed platform with infinite backwards compatibility is a dream even for an interpreted language. Java. Right now, we're just closing our eyes pretending that we are immune from the dependency problems and that the .xo package format will suffice. Do you really

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity bundle format (was Re: Long-term support for Sugar)

2009-09-23 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Wed, 23-09-2009 a las 14:03 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz escribió: Bernie Innocenti wrote: A fixed platform with infinite backwards compatibility is a dream even for an interpreted language. Java. Java is just a marketing lie ;-) The official JVM did not even run anywhere, but on 3

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity bundle format (was Re: Long-term support for Sugar)

2009-09-23 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
Bernie Innocenti wrote: El Wed, 23-09-2009 a las 14:03 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz escribió: Bernie Innocenti wrote: A fixed platform with infinite backwards compatibility is a dream even for an interpreted language. Java. Java is just a marketing lie ;-) The official JVM did not even