Re: [Sugar-devel] Automatically Retrying an AP?

2010-02-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 14:29, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9936 -- and be prepared to get into the In case someone needs to understand this setup, the control

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automatically Retrying an AP?

2010-02-15 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote: I don't have an assorted array of APs to test with, but will give the patch a look once I have dealt with the last feature patches for 0.88. Sorry for not giving better feedback earlier. NP. Great if you can give it a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automatically Retrying an AP?

2010-02-10 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9936 -- and be prepared to get into the In case someone needs to understand this setup, the control logic is mainly in nminfo.py nmclient.py MeshBox.py The whole thing is a mesh

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automatically Retrying an AP?

2010-02-09 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Broke all WPA/WPA2 ones, at least when talking about the first connection attempt. Only some. And needing a retry isn't a big deal. Cost-benefit and risk-benefit analysis tells me that working around it in Sugar is a few orders

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automatically Retrying an AP?

2010-02-08 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: Hopefully ppl who hacked on this code will say yes, you're looking at the right place. Or lookie over there... Actually, if there any notes or diagrams of how the network model/view stuff ties together on 0.82 it'd

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automatically Retrying an AP?

2010-02-08 Thread Daniel Drake
On 4 February 2010 08:04, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list! We have a bug on 802/8.2.1 where in some cases (specific combination of WPA2 with certain AP chipsets) we fail to associate on the very first attempt, and then subsequent attempts succeed. This is an 8.2.1

[Sugar-devel] Automatically Retrying an AP?

2010-02-04 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi list! We have a bug on 802/8.2.1 where in some cases (specific combination of WPA2 with certain AP chipsets) we fail to associate on the very first attempt, and then subsequent attempts succeed. I am wondering if a workaround is possible here -- to patch the Sugar/Neighbourhood view code that

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automatically Retrying an AP?

2010-02-04 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:49 AM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote: I think I convinced myself that network manager was the right place to make the patch, because you want to reuse NM's list/order of The right place, I am sure, is the kernel or firmware ;-) For my specific case, I am

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automatically Retrying an AP?

2010-02-04 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:49 AM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote: I think I convinced myself that network manager was the right place to make the patch, because you want to reuse NM's list/order of The

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automatically Retrying an AP?

2010-02-04 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:26 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote: I thought that had been moved into NM.  I could be wrong. In Sugar 0.82 this seems to be handled but a bunch of objects, and I don't yet understand how they tie together. But src/view/home/MeshBox.py has a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automatically Retrying an AP?

2010-02-04 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:26 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote: I thought that had been moved into NM.  I could be wrong. In Sugar 0.82 this seems to be handled but a bunch of objects, and I don't yet