On 05/31/2013 09:39 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
the build is still broken because of this issue. Can we please fix or
revert asap? Build bugs should be fixed with the highest priority because
they affects everyone, not just your activity.
Pushed a tmp-workaround to get the build going:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 05/31/2013 09:39 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
the build is still broken because of this issue. Can we please fix or
revert asap? Build bugs should be fixed with the highest priority because
they affects
Back green. Thanks a lot Simon for taking care of this.
On Friday, 31 May 2013, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 05/31/2013 09:39 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
the build is still broken because of this issue. Can we please fix or
revert asap? Build bugs should be fixed with the highest
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
/home/buildbot/slave/raring-amd64-quick/build/build/out/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sugar3/activity/activity.py,
line 906, in _prepare_close
self.save()
File
On 05/30/2013 11:14 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
/home/buildbot/slave/raring-amd64-quick/build/build/out/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sugar3/activity/activity.py,
line 906, in _prepare_close
self.save()
File
The upstream bug seems to have no activity?
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690610
On 30 May 2013 11:40, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 05/30/2013 11:14 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On 05/30/2013 12:00 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
The upstream bug seems to have no activity?
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690610
Right, that is why I have no clue what fix Gonzalo means. Anyhow, he
will let us know.
Simon
___
I have closed #690610, because my test case was wrong.
The fix is in vte #676999 and pygobject #690041,
but also can needed other fixes in the management of GArray in pygobject.
I don't know what is the state of these libraries on debian and ubuntu,
but can imagine the terminal maintainer will
On 30 May 2013 14:11, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
I have closed #690610, because my test case was wrong.
The fix is in vte #676999 and pygobject #690041,
but also can needed other fixes in the management of GArray in pygobject.
I don't know what is the state of these libraries
Not if I understand what you say, but from what I see, the error is in the
get_text of Vte.Terminal.
That function does not exist for that object.
If this is the error to be corrected, you can get the text in the terminal
using the clipboard as follows:
terminal.select_all()
And that will not appear as a icon in the sugar frame?
I think now we should do the try catch,
until debian updates the libraries.
Gonzalo
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Flavio Danesse fdane...@gmail.com wrote:
Not if I understand what you say, but from what I see, the error is in the
11 matches
Mail list logo
