Hi, Walter
A quick survey of the 450 xos in my snapshot (including the installed
set) shows 69 using sugar3 and 381 using sugar.
I'll try to prepare a list of the unconverted (infidel) for possible use
as GCI tasks.
Tony
___
Sugar-devel mailing
Very interesting discussion.
Perhaps the difficulties that Tony describes can be interpreted as
emergent properties of the development process.
However, others on private mailing lists, who are not so well
informed, perceived these emergent properties as intended outcomes.
These others are
Hi, Walter
Because of gmail issue, I am sending this through Sugar-devel.
Most of the activities included in 0.106 (XO-1.5+) release have been
moved to GTK3. The exceptions are:
Calculate, Clock, Implode, Labyrinth, Measure, Moon, Pippy, Record,
Speak, and TurtleBlocks.
I suspect that
Quoting Tony Anderson (2015-12-26 21:11:09)
> I guess you see how far out from the developer community I am. I
> associate sucrose with Activity Central. I am not sure what a sucrose
> developer is.
You need not know the details of how the parts of a code eco-system is
divided in order to
Tony, if you have a list of activities that need porting to GTK3, please
let me know: it makes for nice GCI projects. That is how, in fact much of
the updating happened over the past few years.
-walter
--
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
Hi, Jonas
True - either that or ditch the activities evidently too badly
maintained to work well with modern Sugar.
Aye, There's the rub!
Is the problem 'bad maintenance or none at all' or 'modern' Sugar.
Certainly TuxMath is suffering from 'abandonment'. However, even
abandoned code
Quoting Tony Anderson (2015-12-26 16:29:09)
> Yet more examples of this broken software problem.
I would call it examples of _unmaintained_ software.
I.e. in my opinion for these examples the Sugar environment does the
right thing of both a) moving to GTK+ 3.x while b) providing legacy
support
Hi, Jonas
I guess you see how far out from the developer community I am. I
associate sucrose with Activity Central. I am not sure what a sucrose
developer is.
The involved developers have been doing well. However, for many of the
activities in ASLO, the original contributors have moved on, a
Quoting Tony Anderson (2015-12-26 19:53:47)
[Jonas wrote:]
>> True - either that or ditch the activities evidently too badly
>> maintained to work well with modern Sugar.
>
> Aye, There's the rub!
>
> Is the problem 'bad maintenance or none at all' or 'modern' Sugar.
> Certainly TuxMath is
9 matches
Mail list logo
