[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Walter Bender]

-- Forwarded message --
From: Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net>
Date: Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:12 AM
Subject: Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing
To: Walter Bender <wal...@sugarlabs.org>, Martin Abente Lahaye <
martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com>


Hi, Walter

I get these messages periodically. I assume there is someone who looks
after Sugar on Debian.

It would be great if we could have a Debian Sugar release which could be
installed on Ubuntu and on Raspberry Pi.

Tony


 Forwarded Message 
Subject: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 04:39:30 +
From: Debian testing autoremoval watch <nore...@release.debian.org>
<nore...@release.debian.org>
To: su...@packages.debian.org

sugar 0.106.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-01-05

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
842443: abiword: abiword displays documents as black on black with GTK 3.22


-- 
pkg-sugar-devel mailing
listpkg-sugar-devel@lists.alioth.debian.orghttps://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sugar-devel
.







-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
<http://www.sugarlabs.org>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Quoting Tony Anderson (2016-06-24 13:13:57)
> I subscribed to the list because there seemed to be a lot of sugar 
> activity.

I appreciate your interest.


> I have been dismayed by the frequent threats to drop Sugar or a 
> critical component. At one point, the messages suggested that the 
> automated testing scripts could not even read the license text at the 
> beginning of a module.

Please discuss Debian packaging at the dedicated mailinglist.

Makes good sense to share here what you learn from following those 
activities in Debian, but taking details out of context is not helping.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: signature
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Tony Anderson]

Thanks for the reply.

I subscribed to the list because there seemed to be a lot of sugar 
activity. I have been dismayed by the
frequent threats to drop Sugar or a critical component. At one point, 
the messages suggested that the
automated testing scripts could not even read the license text at the 
beginning of a module.


Tony

On 06/24/2016 12:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

Hi Tony!

First of all: Thanks for your interest in Debian packaging of Sugar!

Quoting Tony Anderson (2016-06-24 08:25:07)

Does anyone know what this is all about? How has Debian packaged Sugar
in one package?
What is the difference, if any, between 0.106 as released and 0.106.1-1?
Does this one package
include the essential activities? Does it include both sugar and sugar3?

That warning - and your questions here - are specific to the Debian
packaging of Sugar.

Possibly https://wiki.debian.org/Sugar already answers your questions -
else feel free to ask such questions at our mailinglist referenced at
that wiki page.


  - Jonas

P.S. If you received the warning email through some Sugarlabs list, then
someone has subscribed that list to receive automated messages from
Debian, which is bad: Don't tell robots to receive robot-generated
messages aimed at human.



___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Hi Tony!

First of all: Thanks for your interest in Debian packaging of Sugar!

Quoting Tony Anderson (2016-06-24 08:25:07)
> Does anyone know what this is all about? How has Debian packaged Sugar 
> in one package?
> What is the difference, if any, between 0.106 as released and 0.106.1-1? 
> Does this one package
> include the essential activities? Does it include both sugar and sugar3?

That warning - and your questions here - are specific to the Debian 
packaging of Sugar.

Possibly https://wiki.debian.org/Sugar already answers your questions - 
else feel free to ask such questions at our mailinglist referenced at 
that wiki page.


 - Jonas

P.S. If you received the warning email through some Sugarlabs list, then 
someone has subscribed that list to receive automated messages from 
Debian, which is bad: Don't tell robots to receive robot-generated 
messages aimed at human.

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: signature
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Tony Anderson]

Does anyone know what this is all about? How has Debian packaged Sugar 
in one package?
What is the difference, if any, between 0.106 as released and 0.106.1-1? 
Does this one package
include the essential activities? Does it include both sugar and sugar3? 
What is an RC bug?


Tony


 Forwarded Message 
Subject:[Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing
Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2016 04:39:03 +
From:   Debian testing autoremoval watch 
To: su...@packages.debian.org



sugar 0.106.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-07-19

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
817612: ots: Removal of debhelper compat 4


--
pkg-sugar-devel mailing list
pkg-sugar-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sugar-devel
.



___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Tony Anderson]

Does anyone know what this is all about? How has Debian packaged Sugar 
in one package?
What is the difference, if any, between 0.106 as released and 0.106.1-1? 
Does this one package

include the essential activities? Does it include both sugar and sugar3?

Tony


 Forwarded Message 
Subject:[Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing
Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2016 04:39:03 +
From:   Debian testing autoremoval watch 
To: su...@packages.debian.org



sugar 0.106.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-07-19

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
817612: ots: Removal of debhelper compat 4


--
pkg-sugar-devel mailing list
pkg-sugar-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sugar-devel
.



___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel