Re: [Sugar-devel] GSM string question
Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com writes: Can someone please explain the purpose of these GSM strings? In Sugar 0.94, they did *NOT* say (DEPRECATED/UNUSED), but in Sugar 0.96 and Sugar 0.97, they say (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) If they are really deprecated or unused, why are we still carrying them in the UI? They are used in the description of the GConf entries for Sugar. On the first start of Sugar 0.96+, the content of these entries will be used to create a system-wide connection in NetworkManager 0.9. Changes to the values in GConf after the first start of Sugar 0.96 will be ignored. Users / administrators who previously modified the GConf content directly (instead of going through the Sugar UI) should now modify the connection in NetworkManager. I'm happy to accept a patch to clarify the wording. We should still keep the description around for those upgrading from Sugar up to 0.94 to Sugar 0.98+, skipping Sugar 0.96 in the process. Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ pgpMmyUybxphs.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GSM string question
Sascha, Ok, I accept that they serve a purpose still, I just wanted to make sure they were not inadvertently held over from 0.96 to 0.97. Thanks for the explanation. Regards, cjl On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Sascha Silbe si...@activitycentral.com wrote: Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com writes: Can someone please explain the purpose of these GSM strings? In Sugar 0.94, they did *NOT* say (DEPRECATED/UNUSED), but in Sugar 0.96 and Sugar 0.97, they say (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) If they are really deprecated or unused, why are we still carrying them in the UI? They are used in the description of the GConf entries for Sugar. On the first start of Sugar 0.96+, the content of these entries will be used to create a system-wide connection in NetworkManager 0.9. Changes to the values in GConf after the first start of Sugar 0.96 will be ignored. Users / administrators who previously modified the GConf content directly (instead of going through the Sugar UI) should now modify the connection in NetworkManager. I'm happy to accept a patch to clarify the wording. We should still keep the description around for those upgrading from Sugar up to 0.94 to Sugar 0.98+, skipping Sugar 0.96 in the process. Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] GSM string question
Can someone please explain the purpose of these GSM strings? In Sugar 0.94, they did *NOT* say (DEPRECATED/UNUSED), but in Sugar 0.96 and Sugar 0.97, they say (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) If they are really deprecated or unused, why are we still carrying them in the UI? #: ../data/sugar.schemas.in.h:18 msgid GSM network APN (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) #: ../data/sugar.schemas.in.h:19 msgid GSM network PIN (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) #: ../data/sugar.schemas.in.h:20 msgid GSM network PUK (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) #: ../data/sugar.schemas.in.h:21 msgid GSM network access point name configuration (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) #: ../data/sugar.schemas.in.h:22 msgid GSM network number (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) #: ../data/sugar.schemas.in.h:23 msgid GSM network password (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) #: ../data/sugar.schemas.in.h:24 msgid GSM network password configuration (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) #: ../data/sugar.schemas.in.h:26 msgid GSM network personal unlock key configuration (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) #: ../data/sugar.schemas.in.h:27 msgid GSM network telephone number configuration (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) #: ../data/sugar.schemas.in.h:28 msgid GSM network username (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) #: ../data/sugar.schemas.in.h:29 msgid GSM network username configuration (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) cjl Sugar Labs Translation Team Coordinator ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
