Hello everyone,
I'm sorry for not replying for such a long time, I had exams going on and
had problems with the Internet for the past couple of days.
I've looked at all the dependencies and everything except telepathy-python
is available for python 3. So I plan on porting telepathy python in the
Hello Daniel,
So Improving the unit tests before the actual porting is a must, duely
noted.
If only =3.3 is supported, all the activities HAVE to be ported to =3.3
as well.
Don't you think supporting 2.7+ for a while will enable a smoother
transition?
I also looked at the dependencies, telepathy
On Mar 9, 2014 7:23 PM, Ravi Kumar upma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Daniel,
So Improving the unit tests before the actual porting is a must, duely
noted.
If only =3.3 is supported, all the activities HAVE to be ported to =3.3
as well.
Don't you think supporting 2.7+ for a while will enable a
On 9 March 2014 09:23, Ravi Kumar upma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Daniel,
So Improving the unit tests before the actual porting is a must, duely
noted.
If only =3.3 is supported, all the activities HAVE to be ported to =3.3
as well.
Don't you think supporting 2.7+ for a while will enable a
We could port telepathy-python, it's a fairly small codebase.
I don't think it will be ported, the latest commit is four years old!
https://github.com/PabloCastellano/telepathy-python/tree/examples/src
But I didn't quite understand what exactly telepathy does.
So could you point me to some
On 9 March 2014 12:50, Ravi Kumar upma...@gmail.com wrote:
We could port telepathy-python, it's a fairly small codebase.
I don't think it will be ported, the latest commit is four years old!
https://github.com/PabloCastellano/telepathy-python/tree/examples/src
It sounds like telepathy-python
Hello everyone,
I'm Ravi Kumar, an undergrad Computer Science and Engineering student based
in Bangalore. I'm familiar with Source code management with git and
proficient with Python, Ruby and C, although I haven't made any real
contributions to open-source projects. So this is all the more
Python 2.6? Who uses it??In my opinion: the older version that we must support
must be Python 2.7
Regards!
Alan
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 01:40:45 +0530
From: upma...@gmail.com
To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2014 - Porting the Sugar core onto Python 3.x
info
I think supporting multiple python versions would be too much of a burden,
we are busy enough supporting three toolkits :)
Fedora 18 seems to have 3.3 so I think it would be fine to support =
3.3. The unit tests in place are not really thorough, we started writing
them only recently. Help
9 matches
Mail list logo
