Hi Silbe, first of all congrats on the proposal and second sorry about
the topposting.
What if your GSOC application focuses on the backend (datastore) and I
do the modifications needed in the UI?
The design team at OLPC (most of it are active contributors at SLs)
had thought quite a bit about
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 05:36:41PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
In all of our preliminary designs, we actually proposed that branches
be flattened from the perspective of the user. That is, the most
recent head of any branch in a tree is the canonical version which
appears as the most recent
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 10:30:47AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
(only short answer and possibly last for today as RL is calling)
What if your GSOC application focuses on the backend (datastore) and I
do the modifications needed in the UI?
That's certainly not a bad idea. The proposal only gives
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 05:36:41PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
In all of our preliminary designs, we actually proposed that branches
be flattened from the perspective of the user. That is, the most
recent
2009/4/2 Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org:
Hi!
As my diploma thesis got delayed again, I decided to apply for GSoC and
implement #1 on my list of most urgent missing features in Sugar: Version
support (sorry Michael, but Rainbow only got second place on that list).
Hooray! I
5 matches
Mail list logo
