Re: [Sugar-devel] HTML Sugar: Unit testing research

2013-05-21 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 21 May 2013 01:47, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: So if we were to follow fashion, Mocha would be the one :P . But I think the simplistic approach of Jasmine is good enough for us, specially considering the involvement of new devs. Jasmine is a bit more readable and elegant too.

Re: [Sugar-devel] HTML Sugar: Unit testing research

2013-05-21 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 21 May 2013 01:47, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: I gave a try to Intern http://theintern.io/ . It looks quite interesting and can do both, BDD and TDD, and async. But 1. is too new (released a few days ago) and 2. unless we want continuous integration support (CI) or Selenium

Re: [Sugar-devel] HTML Sugar: Unit testing research

2013-05-21 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2013/5/21 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: On 21 May 2013 01:47, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: So if we were to follow fashion, Mocha would be the one :P . But I think the simplistic approach of Jasmine is good enough for us, specially considering the involvement of new devs.

[Sugar-devel] HTML Sugar: Unit testing research

2013-05-20 Thread Manuel Quiñones
Now that Daniel N has Jasmine working, let's put it under question :) Kidding. In brief: I think Jasmine framework and Karma runner is a simple enough choice, and just what we need at the moment. First, here are some concepts: - BDD - behaviour-driven development. The usual interface has this