Re: [Sugar-devel] Have we achieved consensus among activite Sugar developers? [ Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 21]

2013-11-06 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 6 November 2013 07:15, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: El 06/11/13 00:40, Yioryos Asprobounitis escribió: Looking at the archives of this list you can find several cases (some recent) of non-conforming contributors that are not contributing anymore, supporting the high

Re: [Sugar-devel] Have we achieved consensus among activite Sugar developers? [ Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 21]

2013-11-06 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 06/11/13 10:00, Daniel Narvaez escribió: On 6 November 2013 07:15, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org mailto:sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: I too feel the overall attitude within this list has been dismissive of non-conforming ideas and individuals, sometimes bluntly.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Have we achieved consensus among activite Sugar developers? [ Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 21]

2013-11-05 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
The big idea is that open sources projects thrive when they create  conditions and cultures where people with overlapping yet  non-identical goals can come together collaborate around a common  goal. Sugar Labs has found itself in a position where there is a high degree of conformity. This

Re: [Sugar-devel] Have we achieved consensus among activite Sugar developers? [ Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 21]

2013-11-05 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 06/11/13 00:40, Yioryos Asprobounitis escribió: Looking at the archives of this list you can find several cases (some recent) of non-conforming contributors that are not contributing anymore, supporting the high conformity hypothesis. I too feel the overall attitude within this list has