Hi Tomeu,
On 1 Aug 2009, at 15:37, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Well, I have around 14(including TamTamMini) activities on git.sl.o
to switch to new toolbars.. so you can wish me luck.
>>>
>>> Good luck!
>>>
>>> Quick question: Are you going to try and support existing
>>> deployments and keep a
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:37:24PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 16:33, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 03:19:46PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
> >> On 1 Aug 2009, at 14:51, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:12:50PM +0100, Gary C Martin wro
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 16:33, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 03:19:46PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> On 1 Aug 2009, at 14:51, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>>
>> >On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:12:50PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> >>On 31 Jul 2009, at 10:54, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> >>
>>
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 03:19:46PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 1 Aug 2009, at 14:51, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:12:50PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
> >>On 31 Jul 2009, at 10:54, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> >>
> 1). I was hoping for more feedback before we lock things
On 1 Aug 2009, at 14:51, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:12:50PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> On 31 Jul 2009, at 10:54, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>
1). I was hoping for more feedback before we lock things down,
but it's
been pretty quiet. I was hoping to hack Turtle
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:12:50PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 31 Jul 2009, at 10:54, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
> >>1). I was hoping for more feedback before we lock things down,
> >>but it's
> >>been pretty quiet. I was hoping to hack TurtleArt with a temporary
> >>toolbar imitation and get
On 31 Jul 2009, at 10:54, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> 1). I was hoping for more feedback before we lock things down, but
>> it's
>> been pretty quiet. I was hoping to hack TurtleArt with a temporary
>> toolbar imitation and get some real usability input from kids, but
>> not
>> sure we have the
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/31/2009 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:08, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>> On 07/31/2009 12:02 AM, Eben Eliason wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
> Personally, I see more the issue of naming an activity, since as sa
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:08, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> On 07/31/2009 12:02 AM, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
Personally, I see more the issue of naming an activity, since as said in
another post I am not really convinced ab
On 07/31/2009 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:08, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> On 07/31/2009 12:02 AM, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
Personally, I see more the issue of naming an activity, since as said in
another post I am not really convinced about the namin
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:08, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/31/2009 12:02 AM, Eben Eliason wrote:
[snip]
>>>
>>> Personally, I see more the issue of naming an activity, since as said in
>>> another post I am not really convinced about the naming alert.
>>
>> I'll have to think about this idea
On 07/31/2009 12:02 AM, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On 29 Jul 2009, at 08:55, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>>
> FWIW: Picking the top level tool set is going to be a real tough
On 07/28/2009 05:24 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 28 Jul 2009, at 12:40, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
>> On 07/28/2009 02:51 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On 27 Jul 2009, at 22:26, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>>
On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Caroline,
>
>
On 07/31/2009 02:18 AM, Eben Eliason wrote:
> Here are the icons we used for the view, edit, and color toolbars,
> Sugarized of course. If anyone has suggestions for other common
> toolbars across activities that deserve icons in artwork, let me know.
> Eben
Awesome, thanks. I have pushed them to
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:21:27PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> > On 30 Jul 2009, at 20:46, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Sorry if that wasn't clear. Activity icon and stop icon are e
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:10:23PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:02:00PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Simon Schampijer
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wro
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:05:19PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> > Hi Eben,
> >
> > On 31 Jul 2009, at 01:18, Eben Eliason wrote:
> >
> >> Here are the icons we used for the view, edit, and color toolbars,
> >> Sugarized of course. If anyone h
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 30 Jul 2009, at 20:46, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
>> On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry if that wasn't clear. Activity icon and stop icon are essential.
>>> The Activity icon is going to be critical for identifying wh
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:02:00PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> > On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Simon,
>> >>
>> >> On 29 Jul 2009, at 08:55, Simon Schamp
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Eben,
>
> On 31 Jul 2009, at 01:18, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
>> Here are the icons we used for the view, edit, and color toolbars,
>> Sugarized of course. If anyone has suggestions for other common
>> toolbars across activities that deserve i
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:21:40AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 30 Jul 2009, at 20:46, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
> >On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> >>Sorry if that wasn't clear. Activity icon and stop icon are
> >>essential.
> >>The Activity icon is going to be critical for iden
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:02:00PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> > On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Simon,
> >>
> >> On 29 Jul 2009, at 08:55, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> >>
> FWIW: Picking the top level tool set
Hi Eben,
On 31 Jul 2009, at 01:18, Eben Eliason wrote:
> Here are the icons we used for the view, edit, and color toolbars,
> Sugarized of course. If anyone has suggestions for other common
> toolbars across activities that deserve icons in artwork, let me know.
> Eben
"Share with:" is one, unle
On 30 Jul 2009, at 20:46, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> Sorry if that wasn't clear. Activity icon and stop icon are
>> essential.
>> The Activity icon is going to be critical for identifying what
>> activity
>> you are in at a glance, especially if t
Here are the icons we used for the view, edit, and color toolbars,
Sugarized of course. If anyone has suggestions for other common
toolbars across activities that deserve icons in artwork, let me know.
Eben
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Sim
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 29 Jul 2009, at 08:55, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>
FWIW: Picking the top level tool set is going to be a real tough call in
a number of cases as we loose toolbar
On 07/30/2009 10:15 PM, Christian Marc Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On 7/30/09 4:13 PM, "Simon Schampijer" wrote:
>
>> On 07/30/2009 10:02 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Simon Schampijer
>>> wrote:
On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>
On 07/30/2009 10:02 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On 29 Jul 2009, at 08:55, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>>
> FWIW: Picking the top level tool set is going to be a real tough
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 29 Jul 2009, at 08:55, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>
FWIW: Picking the top level tool set is going to be a real tough call in
a number of cases as we loose toolbar
On 07/29/2009 07:03 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 29 Jul 2009, at 08:55, Simon Schampijer wrote:
FWIW: Picking the top level tool set is going to be a real tough call in
a number of cases as we loose toolbar space for each extra tab, plus the
activity icon on far left (essential for Ac
FWIW, in my limited experience with 0.84 in front of kids, the toolbar
entry for changing the name is rarely used, except in conjunction with
keep (recall that thread?). Since we prompt for a name and description
the first time you close an activity, it is not clear that the name
field needs the sa
Hi Simon,
On 29 Jul 2009, at 08:55, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> FWIW: Picking the top level tool set is going to be a real tough
>> call in
>> a number of cases as we loose toolbar space for each extra tab,
>> plus the
>> activity icon on far left (essential for Activity recognition),
>> plu
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 28 Jul 2009, at 19:03, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Simon Schampijer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/28/2009 03:48 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Simon Schampijer
wrote:
>
I have done the changes for Browse following eben's spec.
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/toolbars
I might refactor the code later, but is a first proof of concept.
Extra: try ctrl+f for finding a string in a page (when the edit toolbar
is not expanded)
Have fun,
Simon
_
On 07/28/2009 08:03 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Simon Schampijer
> wrote:
>> On 07/28/2009 03:48 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Simon Schampijer
>>> wrote:
On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Caroline,
>
>>
On 07/29/2009 04:12 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 28 Jul 2009, at 19:03, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Simon
>> Schampijer wrote:
>>> On 07/28/2009 03:48 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Simon Schampijer
wrote:
>
> On 07/18
On 28 Jul 2009, at 19:03, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Simon
> Schampijer wrote:
>> On 07/28/2009 03:48 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Simon Schampijer>> >
>>> wrote:
On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>
>
On 28 Jul 2009, at 12:40, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/28/2009 02:51 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 27 Jul 2009, at 22:26, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
Hi Caroline,
On 17 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Caroline Meeks wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/28/2009 03:48 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Simon Schampijer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
Hi Caroline,
On 17 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Caroline Meeks w
On 07/28/2009 03:48 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>> Hi Caroline,
>>>
>>> On 17 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Caroline Meeks wrote:
>>>
We can put it in front of actual kids once you get a sample worki
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Caroline,
>>
>> On 17 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Caroline Meeks wrote:
>>
>>> We can put it in front of actual kids once you get a sample working.
>>> We could even try playing the video for ou
On 07/28/2009 02:51 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 27 Jul 2009, at 22:26, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
>> On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>> Hi Caroline,
>>>
>>> On 17 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Caroline Meeks wrote:
>>>
We can put it in front of actual kids once you get a sam
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:51, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:26:20PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> >Hi Caroline,
>> >
>> >On 17 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Caroline Meeks wrote:
>> >
>> >>We can put it in front of actual kids once you ge
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:26:20PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> >Hi Caroline,
> >
> >On 17 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Caroline Meeks wrote:
> >
> >>We can put it in front of actual kids once you get a sample working.
> >>We could even try playing the vide
Hi Simon,
On 27 Jul 2009, at 22:26, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> Hi Caroline,
>>
>> On 17 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Caroline Meeks wrote:
>>
>>> We can put it in front of actual kids once you get a sample working.
>>> We could even try playing the video for
On 07/18/2009 04:17 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Caroline,
>
> On 17 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Caroline Meeks wrote:
>
>> We can put it in front of actual kids once you get a sample working.
>> We could even try playing the video for our existing classes. I don't
>> know if they'll be able to give you f
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 16:57, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Tomeu,
>
> On 17 Jul 2009, at 09:52, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>>> Here are my image mock-ups for Write. All tabs are swapped out as is, for
>>> toolbar buttons. With no need to move existing tab content features
>>> about:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://wi
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 04:17, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Caroline,
>
> On 17 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Caroline Meeks wrote:
>
>> We can put it in front of actual kids once you get a sample working. We
>> could even try playing the video for our existing classes. I don't know if
>> they'll be able to gi
Hi Caroline,
On 17 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Caroline Meeks wrote:
> We can put it in front of actual kids once you get a sample
> working. We could even try playing the video for our existing
> classes. I don't know if they'll be able to give you feedback from
> just seeing the video. Might be
We can put it in front of actual kids once you get a sample working. We
could even try playing the video for our existing classes. I don't know if
they'll be able to give you feedback from just seeing the video. Might be
interesting to find out.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Gary C Martin wr
Hi Tomeu,
On 17 Jul 2009, at 09:52, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> Here are my image mock-ups for Write. All tabs are swapped out as
>> is, for
>> toolbar buttons. With no need to move existing tab content features
>> about:
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Proposals/Toolbars#Top_l
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 04:40, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2009, at 21:01, Gary C Martin wrote:
>
>> On 13 Jul 2009, at 19:48, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:16, Aleksey Lim
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 04:14:33AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
> On
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 03:40:11AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2009, at 21:01, Gary C Martin wrote:
>
>> On 13 Jul 2009, at 19:48, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:16, Aleksey Lim
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 04:14:33AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On
On 13 Jul 2009, at 21:01, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2009, at 19:48, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:16, Aleksey Lim
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 04:14:33AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:29:08PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sat,
Really great stuff.
-walter
--
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 13 Jul 2009, at 19:48, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:16, Aleksey Lim
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 04:14:33AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:29:08PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:16, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 04:14:33AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:29:08PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> > > Another possibility is having Aleksey working on
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 04:14:33AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:29:08PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > > Another possibility is having Aleksey working on converting Write to
> > > the new toolbar and getting
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:29:08PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > Another possibility is having Aleksey working on converting Write to
> > the new toolbar and getting frequent feedback about it. Suggesting
> > Write here because it has
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:14:42PM +0100, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> I meant something like Toolbox.get_toolbars()
I've added Toolbar.subs property to get all ToolItems that have
sub-widgets
> and/or
> Toolbox.get_toolbar(name:str)
hmm.. there is no any names since they are regular ToolButtons
>
I meant something like Toolbox.get_toolbars() and/or
Toolbox.get_toolbar(name:str), so you can easily identify a toolbar,
or check how many toolbars they are and so on.
I don't know how that fits in the new API, that's why I didn't specify details.
2009/7/11 Aleksey Lim :
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 a
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
> One comment re Write toolbars: there are numerous reports from the
> field that we don't support bulleted lists, et al. I think the
> pull-down menu on the style tab is not discoverable (in fact pulldown
> menus in general in Sugar are diffic
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 06:15:21PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 16:53, Eben Eliason wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> >> On 11 Jul 2009, at 14:40, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:12:31AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> >
On 11 Jul 2009, at 14:42, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 11 Jul 2009, at 10:12, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> for reference: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/
>> New_Toolbar_Design
>> eben's mockups: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Designs/Toolbars
>>
>> I had a brief look at the code. Looks
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 16:53, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> On 11 Jul 2009, at 14:40, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:12:31AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
a) DESIGN: discuss the design further and get some mockups
toge
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 11 Jul 2009, at 14:40, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:12:31AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>> a) DESIGN: discuss the design further and get some mockups
>>> together, one
>>> question that came up is: do we always have
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 03:23:34PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 11 Jul 2009, at 14:40, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:12:31AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>> a) DESIGN: discuss the design further and get some mockups together,
>>> one
>>> question that came up is: do we al
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> Another possibility is having Aleksey working on converting Write to
>> the new toolbar and getting frequent feedback about it. Suggesting
>> Write here because it has a crowded to
On 11 Jul 2009, at 14:40, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:12:31AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> a) DESIGN: discuss the design further and get some mockups
>> together, one
>> question that came up is: do we always have a one line secondary tool
>> bar?
>
> Do you mean hiding s
On 11 Jul 2009, at 10:12, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> for reference: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/
> New_Toolbar_Design
> eben's mockups: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Designs/Toolbars
>
> I had a brief look at the code. Looks like a great start and proof
> of concept. What I t
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:12:31AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/11/2009 03:44 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> Hi Aleksey,
>>
>> On 10 Jul 2009, at 16:19, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-toolkit/repos/toolbars
>>> there is simle example in exam
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Another possibility is having Aleksey working on converting Write to
> the new toolbar and getting frequent feedback about it. Suggesting
> Write here because it has a crowded toolbar, could be the journal as
> well because we already
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:49:21AM +0100, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> b) About the API, I would like to stress the need for ways to (more)
> easily remove and add toolbars/toolbar items at runtime.
Usage of new sugar.graphics.Toolbar is clean in that case,
there are just another tool button - sugar.g
b) About the API, I would like to stress the need for ways to (more)
easily remove and add toolbars/toolbar items at runtime.
2009/7/11 Simon Schampijer :
> On 07/11/2009 03:44 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> Hi Aleksey,
>>
>> On 10 Jul 2009, at 16:19, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> http://
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:12, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/11/2009 03:44 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
>> Hi Aleksey,
>>
>> On 10 Jul 2009, at 16:19, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-toolkit/repos/toolbars
>>> there is simle example in examples/toolba
On 07/11/2009 03:44 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Aleksey,
>
> On 10 Jul 2009, at 16:19, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-toolkit/repos/toolbars
>> there is simle example in examples/toolbar.py
>>
>> Does it satisfy mockups?
>
> Sugar-jhbuild is broken f
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 03:44, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Aleksey,
>
> On 10 Jul 2009, at 16:19, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-toolkit/repos/toolbars
>> there is simle example in examples/toolbar.py
>>
>> Does it satisfy mockups?
>
> Sugar-jhbuild is b
On 07/11/2009 03:44 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
Hi Aleksey,
On 10 Jul 2009, at 16:19, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-toolkit/repos/toolbars
there is simle example in examples/toolbar.py
Does it satisfy mockups?
Sugar-jhbuild is broken for me just now so can
Hi Aleksey,
On 10 Jul 2009, at 16:19, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-toolkit/repos/toolbars
> there is simle example in examples/toolbar.py
>
> Does it satisfy mockups?
Sugar-jhbuild is broken for me just now so can't look/test :-( Is this
toolbar exam
Hi all,
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-toolkit/repos/toolbars
there is simle example in examples/toolbar.py
Does it satisfy mockups?
--
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/s
80 matches
Mail list logo
