On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2009, at 17:27, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
> > 2009/3/30 Sascha Silbe :
> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:11:46PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> >>
> >>> Only if something useful is stored. I was wrong to point a finger to
> >>> Browse -
On 30 Mar 2009, at 17:27, Eben Eliason wrote:
> 2009/3/30 Sascha Silbe :
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:11:46PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>>
>>> Only if something useful is stored. I was wrong to point a finger to
>>> Browse - the culprit is Terminal.
>>
>> Try the latest version of Terminal. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:36:18PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:11:46PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> Only if something useful is stored. I was wrong to point a finger to
>> Browse - the culprit is Terminal.
> Try the l
2009/3/30 Sascha Silbe :
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:11:46PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> Only if something useful is stored. I was wrong to point a finger to
>> Browse - the culprit is Terminal.
>
> Try the latest version of Terminal. It does store both current working
> directory and the s
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 17:51, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2009, at 16:25, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 17:19, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>> On 30 Mar 2009, at 15:54, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>>>
Working a bit on the restore angle of things, if I look
On 30 Mar 2009, at 16:25, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 17:19, Gary C Martin
> wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> On 30 Mar 2009, at 15:54, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>>
>>> Working a bit on the restore angle of things, if I look at the
>>> metadata entries to build a restorable Journal Ent
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:11:46PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Only if something useful is stored. I was wrong to point a finger to
Browse - the culprit is Terminal.
Try the latest version of Terminal. It does store both current working
directory and the scrollbuffer (awesome, BTW!).
CU Sas
Hi Martin,
On 30 Mar 2009, at 15:54, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Working a bit on the restore angle of things, if I look at the
> metadata entries to build a restorable Journal Entry Bundle... well...
> in many cases there is no file to build it from.
I know previous releases of Sugar had a design
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 17:19, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On 30 Mar 2009, at 15:54, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> Working a bit on the restore angle of things, if I look at the
>> metadata entries to build a restorable Journal Entry Bundle... well...
>> in many cases there is no file to b
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> I disagree. History and current location are the result of some research and
Only if something useful is stored. I was wrong to point a finger to
Browse - the culprit is Terminal. And we do end up with all these
'Terminal Activity was once op
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 04:54:38PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Offtopic: Some of the complaints about 'noise' and clutter in the
Journal are probably about these content-less entries. Yes, the user
has opened Browse.xo 3 times today, but that's hardly a document
worthy of backing up, or even s
Working a bit on the restore angle of things, if I look at the
metadata entries to build a restorable Journal Entry Bundle... well...
in many cases there is no file to build it from.
Is that normal. Expected? I am tempted to skip those 'Journal entries'
as they have no apparent value. Do people ge
12 matches
Mail list logo
