[Sugar-devel] Logo

Thanks for the suggestions, I recently modified the logo as per of what you suggested and put it up for review. Thanks so much, Abhay ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Logo

Hey, Hope this mail finds you all well. I recently finished working on my 4th task (designing a sugar labs logo) and it is up for review, it was a really good experience getting my hands ston with some designing and the fact that I was designing it for sugar labs makes this deal even

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

> >> If Community wants to support the Sugar Design Marathon to upgrade it I >> volunteer to help you lead the effort. I think we should start working on a >> formal proposal to present to SLOBs asap. >> >> Main objective proposed would be: >> >> - To define in a collaborative way the adoption of

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Laura Vargas wrote: > > 2017-09-14 8:52 GMT-05:00 Samuel Cantero : > >> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:32 AM Laura Vargas >> wrote: >> >>> 2017-09-14 7:23 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Laura Vargas wrote: > > 2017-09-14 8:52 GMT-05:00 Samuel Cantero : > >> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:32 AM Laura Vargas >> wrote: >> >>> 2017-09-14 7:23 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

2017-09-14 8:52 GMT-05:00 Samuel Cantero : > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:32 AM Laura Vargas > wrote: > >> 2017-09-14 7:23 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender : >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Laura Vargas

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:32 AM Laura Vargas wrote: > 2017-09-14 7:23 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender : > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Laura Vargas >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> 2017-09-14 7:00 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

2017-09-14 7:23 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender : > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Laura Vargas > wrote: > >> >> >> 2017-09-14 7:00 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy : >> >>> >>> >>> On Sep 14, 2017 12:52 PM, "Laura Vargas"

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Laura Vargas wrote: > > > 2017-09-14 7:00 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy : > >> >> >> On Sep 14, 2017 12:52 PM, "Laura Vargas" wrote: >> >> >> >> 2017-09-14 6:36 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

2017-09-14 7:00 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy : > > > On Sep 14, 2017 12:52 PM, "Laura Vargas" wrote: > > > > 2017-09-14 6:36 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy : > >> I didn't wanted to reply earlier because i wanted to be sure what the >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Sep 14, 2017 12:52 PM, "Laura Vargas" wrote: 2017-09-14 6:36 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy : > I didn't wanted to reply earlier because i wanted to be sure what the > discussion was all about. I perfectly understand Sebastian worries. But as > walter

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

2017-09-14 6:36 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy : > I didn't wanted to reply earlier because i wanted to be sure what the > discussion was all about. I perfectly understand Sebastian worries. But as > walter mention Sugar Labs was a spinoff of OLPC and that is why the logo is >

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

I didn't wanted to reply earlier because i wanted to be sure what the discussion was all about. I perfectly understand Sebastian worries. But as walter mention Sugar Labs was a spinoff of OLPC and that is why the logo is still present. Now, what i think we should do is to ask SLOBS if we want to

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > > On 13/09/17 20:22, Martin Abente wrote: > > >> The proposed feet logo is likely a violation of the GNOME Foundation >> trademark, more info on their site [3]. >> > > If the feet logo could be a violation

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On 14/09/17 05:40, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Sebastian want a version of sugar-artwork with his own logo, > he can fork the repository. Sugarlabs repositories should be managed > according with the community rules > and looking for consensus. > > Gonzalo Hi Gonzalo, As you yourself pointed out in

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Laura Vargas wrote: > > > 2017-09-14 5:40 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard : > >> Samuel, >> You are right (Laura Vargas is Sebastian Silva wife). >> > > You guys have to get over the fact that we are a married couple. We are 2 >

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

2017-09-14 5:40 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard : > Samuel, > You are right (Laura Vargas is Sebastian Silva wife). > You guys have to get over the fact that we are a married couple. We are 2 happy long time Sugar Labs contributors. You cannot be discriminated us in any way for our

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

Samuel, You are right (Laura Vargas is Sebastian Silva wife). The first push from Sebastian of his own work is already a violation of the Sugarlabs collaborations rules https://developer.sugarlabs.org/contributing.md.html# sending%20a%20pull-request If Sebastian want a version of sugar-artwork

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

2017-09-13 22:58 GMT-05:00 Samuel Cantero : > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:29 PM Laura Vargas > wrote: > > 2017-09-13 22:10 GMT-05:00 Martin Abente : >> >>> I noticed that my PR review and merged by Ignacio, but it later

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:29 PM Laura Vargas wrote: 2017-09-13 22:10 GMT-05:00 Martin Abente : > >> I noticed that my PR review and merged by Ignacio, but it later was >> reverted by Sebastian again. >> > > Martin, > > Please check with

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

2017-09-13 22:10 GMT-05:00 Martin Abente : > I noticed that my PR review and merged by Ignacio, but it later was > reverted by Sebastian again. > Martin, Please check with care: Sebastian's PR was merged by me, Laura Victoria.

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

I noticed that my PR review and merged by Ignacio, but it later was reverted by Sebastian again. Looks like if I send another PR, this will keep happening, and i just want to point out that this is VERY scary, having one person unilaterally making these decisions. This is wrong. On Wed, Sep 13,

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On 13/09/17 21:38, Sebastian Silva wrote: > (...) before I can accept to distribute Sugar with this icon or > subject our distributors or users to risk of being bullied by a > copyright owner. I meant, /Trademark holder/. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On 13/09/17 20:22, Martin Abente wrote: > > > The proposed feet logo is likely a violation of the GNOME > Foundation trademark, more info on their site [3]. > > > If the feet logo could be a violation of the GNOME trademark, then > lets revert it, until a proper replacement is found (and

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

2017-09-13 21:18 GMT-05:00 Sean DALY : > There is zero urgency in changing the xo logo, > Not Martin you are wrong. The Urgency was Sugar users are not free as in "Libre" to use it. Why do keep insisting in keeping it? -- Laura V. * I SomosAZUCAR.Org* “Solo la

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

There is zero urgency in changing the xo logo, which has been in Sugar since its inception, with its use encouraged by OLPC. On the contrary, rushing to a logo which may infringe the GNOME Foundation's trademark could land Sugar Labs and the SFC in difficulty. And in any case, any major branding

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Sean DALY wrote: > In the past, OLPC was amenable to the use of the xo logo in Sugar, but > asked we not use it in marketing materials without a formal co-branding > licensing agreement. [1,2] > > The proposed feet logo is likely a violation

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

2017-09-13 16:02 GMT-05:00 Sean DALY : > In the past, OLPC was amenable to the use of the xo logo in Sugar, but > asked we not use it in marketing materials without a formal co-branding > licensing agreement. > ... 1.

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

In the past, OLPC was amenable to the use of the xo logo in Sugar, but asked we not use it in marketing materials without a formal co-branding licensing agreement. [1,2] The proposed feet logo is likely a violation of the GNOME Foundation trademark, more info on their site [3]. Sean. 1.

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

Regardless of the separate trademark discussion, I still don't understand why someone just decided to change the logo and merged it even though several people asked him not to (without proper discussion, and not even knowing if its really necessary). On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Walter Bender

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Laura Vargas wrote: > Am attaching the previous brand icon Trademark just for reference. > The question is more complex than whether or not OLPC received a trademark. Was it ever applicable to our use in Sugar? Is it still valid? Note that

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Laura Vargas wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Yes Sugar user interface needed to urgently get rid of any Trademark at > all. We can breath now :D > Alex, I suggest you read the discussion thread in the link I included in the original message for some

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

Hi Alex, Yes Sugar user interface needed to urgently get rid of any Trademark at all. We can breath now :D If you don't like the feet feel free to propose a new option or a dynamic for our Community to accomplish a new one collaboratively. I really like the cute little finger color's. See how

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On this subject, I may have missed this, but where did the (IMHO awful) "feet" icon come from, who approved its use, and was the board involved with the decision? It seems a fairly central branding decision. Walter Bender Wednesday, September 13, 2017 5:49 AM

[Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

Regarding https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-artwork/pull/96 it would be helpful to get Tony's feedback. Can you please contact him as our liaison to the SFC? regards. -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] logo for hulahop? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507499

hi folks if you'd like hulahop to have a chance of getting onto the featured apps page a logo / icon would be needed. as this is a chance for promotion of OLPC, sugarlabs as well as hulahop, could someone consider logging in to the mozilla bugtracker and provide a link? l.

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo for hulahop? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507499

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 13:01, Luke Kenneth Casson Leightonl...@lkcl.net wrote: hi folks if you'd like hulahop to have a chance of getting onto the featured apps page a logo / icon would be needed.  as this is a chance for promotion of OLPC, sugarlabs as well as hulahop, could someone consider

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo for hulahop? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507499

Mathieu makes a good point, but forgot to keep the list in CC. On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 14:10, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote: hi folks if you'd like hulahop to have a chance of getting onto the featured apps page a logo / icon would be needed.  as this is a chance

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo for hulahop? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507499

On 7/31/09, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 13:01, Luke Kenneth Casson Leightonl...@lkcl.net wrote: hi folks if you'd like hulahop to have a chance of getting onto the featured apps page a logo / icon would be needed. as this is a chance for promotion

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo for hulahop? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507499

This is the browser's (called Browse actually) icon. http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/mainline/blobs/master/activity/activity-web.svg 2009/7/31 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net: On 7/31/09, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 13:01, Luke

Re: [Sugar-devel] Logo

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:54:50AM -0500, Andrés Arrieta Perréard wrote: Hi, I'm trying to modify the logo on soas that says Sugar at the boot. http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-May/014230.html Alphinux Martin pgpAlyrWoaaIP.pgp Description: PGP signature

[Sugar-devel] Logo

Hi, I'm trying to modify the logo on soas that says Sugar at the boot. I want to add to it the Telmex logo.So I need to do it on an already installed pen drive, but also to make a build with that logo so next time I do a pen drive it will have the modified logo. I've done a mess of files with