Re: [Sugar-devel] Mailman's admin and archive interfaces are horrible - suggest GroupServer.org

2010-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:56:05PM -0400, Luke Faraone wrote: On 10/17/2010 07:15 PM, Tim McNamara wrote: I'm assuming the infrastructure team are part of this list. We are, sorry for the long reply time. The archives are easily searchable, attached files are converted to links to the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mailman's admin and archive interfaces are horrible - suggest GroupServer.org

2010-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 04:13:42PM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 26.10.2010, at 11:14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:56:05PM -0400, Luke Faraone wrote: On 10/17/2010 07:15 PM, Tim McNamara wrote: I'm assuming the infrastructure team are part of this list. We are,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mailman's admin and archive interfaces are horrible - suggest GroupServer.org

2010-10-25 Thread Luke Faraone
On 10/17/2010 07:15 PM, Tim McNamara wrote: I'm assuming the infrastructure team are part of this list. We are, sorry for the long reply time. The archives are easily searchable, attached files are converted to links to the server so that people's inboxes are not flooded. Removing inline

[Sugar-devel] Mailman's admin and archive interfaces are horrible - suggest GroupServer.org

2010-10-17 Thread Tim McNamara
I'm assuming the infrastructure team are part of this list. I would like to recommend that Sugar Labs considers migrating from mailman to GroupServer as its mailing list system[1]. I've been using GroupServer as a participant for over a year for lots of open government New Zealand activities [1].