On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 03:15, C. Scott Ananiancsc...@cscott.net wrote:
When I wrote the sugar updater, I included all the code necessary to
transfer only the changed portions of a large zip file.
http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/cscott/sugar-update-control/tree/bitfrost/util/urlrange.py
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 03:15, C. Scott Ananiancsc...@cscott.net wrote:
When I wrote the sugar updater, I included all the code necessary to
transfer only the changed portions of a large zip file.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Bernie Innocentiber...@codewiz.org wrote:
This means you'd have to change both the client-side
(sugar-update-control, fairly simple) and the server side
(in our case Mozilla Addons, fairly complex).
The XS - which Bryan has - already has an rsync server using
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
It should be noted that trusting the CRC32 to validate the file contents is
insecure -- but IIRC the security of the update scheme relies on other
signatures (probably still unimplemented -- do you know anything about that,
Michael?) so you shouldn't have to worry
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 22:15 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
What about something similar to the deltarpm feature in F11 where
there's a delta created between the previous release and it is served
over standard http/ftp/whatever like the full package. In the initial
set of updates released for
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 06:00 +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
In Nepal, we are not updating against activities.sugarlabs.org but
against the local XS. Would it be terribly complicated to change the
code on the XS?
No, because there's no code at all: it's just static HTML. You could
set
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 06:00 +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
In Nepal, we are not updating against activities.sugarlabs.org but
against the local XS. Would it be terribly complicated to change the
code on the XS?
No, because there's no code at all: it's just static HTML. You could
set
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 06:00 +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
In Nepal, we are not updating against activities.sugarlabs.org but
against the local XS. Would it be terribly complicated to change the
code on the XS?
No, because there's no code at all: it's just static HTML. You could
set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:47:57PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 06/15/09 16:37, Bryan Berry wrote:
I want to use rsync but I need a mechanism that the users (kids) can
initiate through a simple GUI, like the current Activity Update
When I wrote the sugar updater, I included all the code necessary to
transfer only the changed portions of a large zip file.
http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/cscott/sugar-update-control/tree/bitfrost/util/urlrange.py
contains the interesting bits. The only missing piece was a proper
manifest
We soon need to roll out updated version of Nepal's custom suite of
activities, E-Paath. The updated bundle weighs in at a whopping 180 MB
zipped and 300 MB unzipped. We have found it impractical to use the
sugar-update-control mechanism to update the bundle. While E-Paath is
large, the updated
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Bryan Berrybr...@olenepal.org wrote:
I would like to know if the newer version of sugar-control-update
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-update-control/repos/mainline/blobs/master/src/model.py
only transfers the differences between the new and old
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:18 -0400, Ton van Overbeek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Bryan Berrybr...@olenepal.org wrote:
I would like to know if the newer version of sugar-control-update
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-update-control/repos/mainline/blobs/master/src/model.py
On 06/15/09 16:37, Bryan Berry wrote:
I want to use rsync but I need a mechanism that the users (kids) can
initiate through a simple GUI, like the current Activity Update
mechanism.
Rsync's unique capability to transmit only changed blocks within
large files requires using the real rsync://
I want to use rsync but I need a mechanism that the users (kids) can
initiate through a simple GUI, like the current Activity Update
mechanism.
Rsync's unique capability to transmit only changed blocks within
large files requires using the real rsync:// protocol. It won't
work over dumb
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 22:47 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 06/15/09 16:37, Bryan Berry wrote:
I want to use rsync but I need a mechanism that the users (kids) can
initiate through a simple GUI, like the current Activity Update
mechanism.
Rsync's unique capability to transmit only
16 matches
Mail list logo
