On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 02:07, Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote:
Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org writes:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 13:31, Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1 on the overall.
Building Sugar from source should be as easy as:
,
| ~$
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 13:31, Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1 on the overall.
Building Sugar from source should be as easy as:
,
| ~$ git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-core/mainline.git
| ~$ ./configure
| ~$ make
| ~$ sudo make install
`
Well, that works for the
Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org writes:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 13:31, Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1 on the overall.
Building Sugar from source should be as easy as:
,
| ~$ git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-core/mainline.git
| ~$ ./configure
| ~$ make
| ~$ sudo make
+1 on the overall.
Building Sugar from source should be as easy as:
,
| ~$ git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-core/mainline.git
| ~$ ./configure
| ~$ make
| ~$ sudo make install
`
(Sidenote: I guess it's a gitorious thingy, but mainline.git is a pretty
stupid name for a git repo. It forces
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.comwrote:
+1 on the overall.
Building Sugar from source should be as easy as:
,
| ~$ git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-core/mainline.git
| ~$ ./configure
| ~$ make
| ~$ sudo make install
`
(Sidenote: I guess it's a
Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero dir...@gmail.com writes:
You can use something like..
git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/project/mainline.git project
to avoid creating folders by hand.
Yes, thanks!
--
Bastien
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
On 05/22/09 20:18, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 03:45:04PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Support for Fedora 11 was missing in sysdeps. I pushed a patch adding
it.
Thanks! The way Fedora versioning works is starting to get annoying (I
had to add Fedora 10.93 just two weeks
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:29:56PM +0200, NoiseEHC wrote:
When I tried jhbuild what I found strange that it does not detect the
Linux distro so I had to manually enter commands as it was specified
on the wiki.
That must have been quite some time ago as sugar-jhbuild does detect the
distro
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 01:29:12PM +0200, NoiseEHC wrote:
I am talking about this:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Jhbuild/Fedora
I'm assuming you're talking about the Prerequisites section. There are
two answers to your question:
1. (sugar-)jhbuild needs a certain set of
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 08:28:07PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
xulrunner now fails to build with gcc 4.4 (in F11) because of a tiny
error in an #elif directive. Is there a way in jhbuild to apply
patches
to sources?
Take a look at the telepathy-gabble definition. Other modules try to
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 08:41:40PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
No need to do that for all users, we can do it distro by distro. I
think that each distro in jhbuild should have its maintainer, as
Sascha cannot run all of them.
Currently I am (running an instance of all supported distros), but
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 01:34:20PM +0200, NoiseEHC wrote:
For example by autodetecting the Linux distro, it could create a full
command line. Of course, if it could be automated then it should just
say something:
The following dependencies are missing: long list here. To install
them, type
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 14:59, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 02:47:22PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Also, maybe what we need is better documentation rather than big
changes that bring new problems?
What kind of documentation are you thinking of?
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 02:47:22PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Also, maybe what we need is better documentation rather than big
changes that bring new problems?
What kind of documentation are you thinking of?
Something like what we currently have, only that addressing the points
recently
On 05/22/09 13:29, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:29:56PM +0200, NoiseEHC wrote:
When I tried jhbuild what I found strange that it does not detect the
Linux distro so I had to manually enter commands as it was specified
on the wiki.
That must have been quite some time ago as
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 03:45:04PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Support for Fedora 11 was missing in sysdeps. I pushed a patch adding
it.
Thanks! The way Fedora versioning works is starting to get annoying (I
had to add Fedora 10.93 just two weeks ago). Maybe we should add some
kind of
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
As with any other sugar module, people want to run the latest code
because it will contain bugfixes, etc. I see hulahop in the same way.
As with any other module of anything, some people want to run Stable,
some want
I can only speak of opensuse and mandriva but we compile xulrunner ourselves
on those 2 plaftorms...
David (nubae)
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Edward Cherlin echer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
As with any other sugar
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 21:10, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Today I've kick-started a newbie on building Sugar to fix a small bug
and submit his first patch.
It was just painful. jhbuild has plenty of rough corners and we could
easily make things easier with a few changes:
1)
On 05/20/09 23:29, NoiseEHC wrote:
When I tried jhbuild what I found strange that it does not detect the
Linux distro so I had to manually enter commands as it was specified on
the wiki. Can we get rid of that? (I have no idea how to detect the
distro or how to automate that just to let you
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:40, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On 05/20/09 23:29, NoiseEHC wrote:
When I tried jhbuild what I found strange that it does not detect the
Linux distro so I had to manually enter commands as it was specified on
the wiki. Can we get rid of that? (I have
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 05/20/09 23:29, NoiseEHC wrote:
When I tried jhbuild what I found strange that it does not detect the
Linux distro so I had to manually enter commands as it was specified on
the wiki. Can we get rid of that? (I have no idea how to detect the
distro or how to
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:40, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On 05/20/09 23:29, NoiseEHC wrote:
When I tried jhbuild what I found strange that it does not detect the
Linux distro so I had to manually enter commands as it was specified on
the wiki. Can
On 05/21/09 10:03, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
1) Stop checking out random unstable versions of external projects.
They break very often, and we cannot fix them. Let's instead upgrade
manually every once in a while after some testing.
We are supposed to be doing this already, which modules are not
On 21.05.2009, at 01:03, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 21:10, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
Today I've kick-started a newbie on building Sugar to fix a small bug
and submit his first patch.
It was just painful. jhbuild has plenty of rough corners and we
On 05/21/09 13:29, NoiseEHC wrote:
I am talking about this:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Jhbuild/Fedora
As I told I do not know how difficult can it be to automate so if it
would be a lot of work then of course you should not put too much work
into it.
BTW text like the
Today I've kick-started a newbie on building Sugar to fix a small bug
and submit his first patch.
It was just painful. jhbuild has plenty of rough corners and we could
easily make things easier with a few changes:
1) Stop checking out random unstable versions of external projects.
They break
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Today I've kick-started a newbie on building Sugar to fix a small bug
and submit his first patch.
It was just painful. jhbuild has plenty of rough corners and we could
easily make things easier with a few changes:
1) Stop checking out random unstable versions of
+1 overall.
The Wiki recommends sugar-jhbuild as an environment for developers.
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team
Development systems
All of core Sugar development except system-dependent modifications
can be done on a standard computer by compiling jhbuild and editing
with your
29 matches
Mail list logo
