Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-24 Thread Bernie Innocenti
C. Scott Ananian wrote: > It's probably worth reading through the pilgrim > 'streams.d/olpc-development.stream' file to see if there are other > fixes you are missing. Indeed. Starting with a white-room F10 build is going to cause many such regressions, and re-discovering all the associated worka

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-24 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > FWIW, I have noticed mmap errors while trying to deal with large files > (~70MB) on the standard OLPC builds. localedef does not work in the XO > for this (strace shows that it chokes when trying to mmap > /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive) I don't think it's related to th

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-24 Thread Jerry Vonau
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 18:01 -0500, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Marco, > > Some extra steps: > >> * Clone git://git.fedoraproject.org/spin-kickstarts >> * If you want F10 apply spin.patch >> * Apply live.patch in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/imgcreate > >* sudo yum -y install livec

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-24 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 04:51:04AM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > 2 X "fades" a couple of times and then hangs the system. Describe this further? -- James Cameronmailto:qu...@us.netrek.org http://quozl.netrek.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-24 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti > wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Chris Ball wrote: >>> D'oh, I think OLPC asked Warren to push that X driver update, and it >>> sounds like we didn't test it properly. Is there a good way to select >

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-24 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Chris Ball wrote: >> D'oh, I think OLPC asked Warren to push that X driver update, and it >> sounds like we didn't test it properly. Is there a good way to select >> which version of an RPM to use in

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-24 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Chris Ball wrote: >> D'oh, I think OLPC asked Warren to push that X driver update, and it >> sounds like we didn't test it properly. Is there a good way to select >> which version of an RPM to use in

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > D'oh, I think OLPC asked Warren to push that X driver update, and it > sounds like we didn't test it properly. Is there a good way to select > which version of an RPM to use in kickstart, maybe? Which package are you referring to here exactly

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:42 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti > wrote: >> * rpm does not work. It complains about mmap failure when reading the >> db, jffs2 related? > > As far as I know, jffs2 doesn't support writable mmaps. In the debian > po

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-23 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Marco, Got it working now. livecd-creator should be run on x86_64 as: sudo setarch i386 livecd-creator ... > * X doesn't actually crash the system, it's just very broken :) If > you switch to vt and back you can also see some parts of the gdm > screen. It looks definitely like a re

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-23 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > * rpm does not work. It complains about mmap failure when reading the > db, jffs2 related? As far as I know, jffs2 doesn't support writable mmaps. In the debian ports, we add some special magic to tell apt not to use them ( http://w

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-23 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > Yay, stock F10 is now running GNOME fine. Some more things I found: > > * I was not using -a when copying the files, so owners and all kind of > other stuff was not preserved. That's the cause of the hal failure, > new script attached

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Yay, stock F10 is now running GNOME fine. Some more things I found: * I was not using -a when copying the files, so owners and all kind of other stuff was not preserved. That's the cause of the hal failure, new script attached. * With selinux enabled you cannot login from the console. Perhaps jff

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > I'm still not able to get the images I create to boot on the XO -- could > you confirm that you're using the Fedora kernel and initrd? Yup, sure. The only difference is that the initrd contains more modules, because of the livecd-tools change

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-22 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Marco, Some extra steps: > * Clone git://git.fedoraproject.org/spin-kickstarts > * If you want F10 apply spin.patch > * Apply live.patch in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/imgcreate * sudo yum -y install livecd-tools mtd-utils crcimg * If you're building on F10, s/ext4/ext3/ i

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-21 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Marco, > Same results as yesterday with F10 while F11 fails to /init (both > images built from an F10). I gave this a try, and I get a hang after "Loading ramdisk image.." in OFW when booting a Rawhide image built on a Rawhide/x86-64 host. Will try with a serial port connected tomorrow.

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-21 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > It looks like you're making F10 spins, then? I wonder what happens if > you try a Rawhide spin instead. Could you share your instructions and > code? I'd like to give this technique a try for our F11 rebase. * Clone git://git.fedoraproject.o

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 17:36, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >> > 1 haldaemon fails to start and I couldn't find any error log. >> >> Maybe running it directly, rather than via init, will expose the >> problem? > > When running it directly it was sitting for a while and then exiting > without any

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-21 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
> > 1 haldaemon fails to start and I couldn't find any error log. > > Maybe running it directly, rather than via init, will expose the > problem? When running it directly it was sitting for a while and then exiting without any error (even in verbose mode). I should strace it. > It looks like yo

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-21 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Marco, > Hello, I spent some time trying to get Sugar on a stick images > (which are basically livecd-tools based Fedora spins) running on > the XO from nand. Converting the image to jffs2 and adding > cafe_nand and jffs2 to the initrd was enough to make it boot. You're awesome! T

[Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Hello, I spent some time trying to get Sugar on a stick images (which are basically livecd-tools based Fedora spins) running on the XO from nand. Converting the image to jffs2 and adding cafe_nand and jffs2 to the initrd was enough to make it boot. I have two weird problems: 1 haldaemon fails to