Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.88 in F11-XO1

2010-02-24 Thread Martin Dengler
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:43:33PM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote: From today's #sugar-meeting: erikos bernie: I think a big problem to recruit 0.88 testers, is that there are no xo images erikos bernie: scratch builds, like tomeu said, sounds good erikos bernie: and then create a repo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.88 in F11-XO1

2010-02-24 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 17:50 +, Martin Dengler wrote: Sorry if it's been answered already: I wonder why you prefer 0.88 on F11 for XO-1 builds, rather than 0.88 (or latest) on F12 (or latest) for XO-1 builds? Stabilizing a new Fedora release on the XO-1 is likely to take more time than I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.88 in F11-XO1

2010-02-23 Thread Bernie Innocenti
(re-adding the lists) On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 06:55 -0600, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: But this thread is about F11-on-XO1. Meaning that yum ought to be defaulting to accessing the F11 repositories. I just now enabled the 'rawhide' repository for my F12-based XO1, and explicitly pulled down

[Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.88 in F11-XO1

2010-02-22 Thread Bernie Innocenti
From today's #sugar-meeting: erikos bernie: I think a big problem to recruit 0.88 testers, is that there are no xo images erikos bernie: scratch builds, like tomeu said, sounds good erikos bernie: and then create a repo erikos bernie: maybe mtd is interested in that, too Ok, I'll create some