Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-25 Thread NoiseEHC
I hope this anwers your question, Simon Unfortunately it does not. What I wanted to know whether I will be able to use the latest Sugar on my XO-1 ever. It boots the kernel with 802 so it is a working Linux distribution. If somehow I copy the latest Sugar over the old Sugar (0.82 I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-25 Thread Marten Vijn
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:42 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: [adding sugar-devel again to CC] On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 14:36, Marten Vijn i...@martenvijn.nl wrote: On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:49 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:34, NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu wrote: cut

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-25 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 16:25, Marten Vijn i...@martenvijn.nl wrote: On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:42 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: [adding sugar-devel again to CC] On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 14:36, Marten Vijn i...@martenvijn.nl wrote: On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:49 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Mon,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-25 Thread Simon Schampijer
[...] That's why people are barking at the wrong tree when they say that Sugar developers should port Sugar to whatever system. The skills involved are very different from upstream work and if coders are not coding we won't have anything new to ship. If barking ever applies me to please let

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-25 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 05/25/2009 11:51 AM, Walter Bender wrote: Tomeu was quicker in his response than me... As Simon said, the current plan for *both* the XO-1 and the XO-1.5 in regard to Sugar support is to build upon the work that OLPC and the Fedora communities are doing towards getting a stock Fedora

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-24 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:51:22PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: On 05/22/2009 05:31 PM, James Simmons wrote: I didn't see Aleksey's espeak gstreamer plugin included in the roadmap. This is needed for text to speech with highlighting support for Read Etexts, and is being included in

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES (Thursday May 21 2009 - 14.00 (UTC))

2009-05-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
Attendees: Tomeu, Aleksey, Walter, Sayamindu, Simon Retrospect: We have been brainstorming on the Goals of the 0.86 release. The Output can be seen at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Roadmap/0.86 Feel free to add items you feel important to the roadmap - have in mind that

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-22 Thread James Simmons
Simmons Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 14:49:01 +0200 From: Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de Subject: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES (Thursday May 21 2009 - 14.00 (UTC)) To: Sugar Devel sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Message-ID: 4a169f3d.3020...@schampijer.de Content-Type: text/plain

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-22 Thread NoiseEHC
Are there any plans to port Sugar to the XO-1 or will it be the job of OLPC so it will be effectively abandoned? Simon Schampijer wrote: Attendees: Tomeu, Aleksey, Walter, Sayamindu, Simon Retrospect: We have been brainstorming on the Goals of the 0.86 release. The Output can be seen at

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-22 Thread Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
Hi Noise. There is and there will be (i presume), a collaboration between the two teams (OLPC and Sugarlabs), to port sugar to the XO 1.5. but details on how this will be done are still missing. Rafael Ortiz On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:43 AM, NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu wrote: Are there

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-22 Thread David Farning
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:43 PM, NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu wrote: Are there any plans to port Sugar to the XO-1 or will it be the job of OLPC so it will be effectively abandoned? Sugar sits on top of standard linux distributions. The challenge in this instance is on the shoulders of the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 05/22/2009 07:06 PM, David Farning wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:43 PM, NoiseEHCnoise...@freemail.hu wrote: Are there any plans to port Sugar to the XO-1 or will it be the job of OLPC so it will be effectively abandoned? Sugar sits on top of standard linux distributions. The

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 05/22/2009 05:31 PM, James Simmons wrote: I didn't see Aleksey's espeak gstreamer plugin included in the roadmap. This is needed for text to speech with highlighting support for Read Etexts, and is being included in SoaS now. I'm looking forward to having a version of Sugar I can

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Developer MINUTES

2009-05-22 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
NoiseEHC wrote: Are there any plans to port Sugar to the XO-1 or will it be the job of OLPC so it will be effectively abandoned? Do you mean the XO-1 or XO-1.5, specifically? Also, I hope you are aware of http://blog.printf.net/articles/2009/05/16/the-olpc-xo-1-5-and-fedora-11 which states