Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2014-03-09 14:46 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: On 9 March 2014 17:53, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: Hi dear Sugar developers. We have participated in the deployment in Peru of Sugar 0.94 (classic) for XO1 and XO1.5. It will be ongoing in 2014 and hopefully

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote: Hi dear Sugar developers. We have participated in the deployment in Peru of Sugar 0.94 (classic) for XO1 and XO1.5. It will be ongoing in 2014 and hopefully we will tighten the feedback circle and work closer

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Activity startup time is in the shell.log if sugar have debug enabled. +100 on Gonzalo's recommendations. Also a couple of notes, from memory, - Gobject Introspection turned out to be slow to instantiate (IIRC, dsd

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 09/03/14 12:46, Daniel Narvaez escribió: On 9 March 2014 17:53, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org mailto:sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: For us to base our work on 0.101+ (new) Sugar, we have to make sure we have solved the performance issues plaguing (new) Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
A quick note, be sure you have the last packages gobject-introspection and pygobject3 from dsd repository [1] or the patches applied to your own packages. Gonzalo [1] http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/public_rpms/f18/ On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Sebastian Silva
Thanks for the notes, do you maybe have a link to the patches that need applying? Sebastian El 10/03/14 10:30, Gonzalo Odiard escribió: A quick note, be sure you have the last packages gobject-introspection and pygobject3 from dsd repository [1] or the patches applied to your own packages.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: Thanks for the notes, do you maybe have a link to the patches that need applying? No, but the src rpms are in the same directory, and have the patches. The changes were explained by dsd in a old mail in this

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
This is a initial report about the use of systemtap to profile sugar http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Profile/Systemtap Gonzalo On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.orgwrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 9 March 2014 17:53, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: Hi dear Sugar developers. We have participated in the deployment in Peru of Sugar 0.94 (classic) for XO1 and XO1.5. It will be ongoing in 2014 and hopefully we will tighten the feedback circle and work closer with

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Performance testing

2014-03-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Something I forgot to mention is that when testing activity startup you really need to clean the kernel memory cache before each run, or you will get inconsistent data. sudo sh -c echo 3 /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches On 9 March 2014 18:46, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 March 2014