Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Presence Service and Resume Behavior

2009-07-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 06:01, Eben Eliasone...@laptop.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartzbmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Eben Eliason wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartzbmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Eben Eliason wrote: I know

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Presence Service and Resume Behavior

2009-07-01 Thread Eben Eliason
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 06:01, Eben Eliasone...@laptop.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartzbmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Eben Eliason wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Benjamin M.

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Presence Service and Resume Behavior

2009-06-29 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
My GSoC project involves getting offline collaboration working. My model for this is that two users can join a shared session, then go offline, resume the session from the journal, continue working, and then later resume again when they are on the same network/server and have the two instances

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Presence Service and Resume Behavior

2009-06-29 Thread Eben Eliason
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartzbmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: My GSoC project involves getting offline collaboration working. My model for this is that two users can join a shared session, then go offline, resume the session from the journal, continue working, and then

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Presence Service and Resume Behavior

2009-06-29 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
Eben Eliason wrote: I know GroupThink does everything it can to prevent collisions, but with this we should also be thinking about the worst case. The intended baseline behavior (before we get into any fancy merging libraries) was to allow two instances with the same activity_id but different

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Presence Service and Resume Behavior

2009-06-29 Thread Eben Eliason
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartzbmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Eben Eliason wrote: I know GroupThink does everything it can to prevent collisions, but with this we should also be thinking about the worst case. The intended baseline behavior (before we get into any fancy

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Presence Service and Resume Behavior

2009-06-29 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
Eben Eliason wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartzbmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Eben Eliason wrote: I know GroupThink does everything it can to prevent collisions, but with this we should also be thinking about the worst case. The intended baseline behavior (before

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Presence Service and Resume Behavior

2009-06-29 Thread Eben Eliason
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartzbmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Eben Eliason wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartzbmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Eben Eliason wrote: I know GroupThink does everything it can to prevent collisions, but with this we