Thanks for looking at this Joe.
I don't know the Fedora processes to be able to recommend exact
actions, or probable outcomes in the face of inaction.
Sugar Live Build's list of activities is the Sugar Labs "Fructose"
set; they are maintained along with Sugar. But Sugar Live Build does
not use
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 04:02:41PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote:
> Right, and the goal for Fedora 32 is to eliminate all of those activities.
> They
> either get patched/ported, or dropped as a packaged activity within Fedora,
As I read this for where things stand as of several hours ago:
Hi All,
Just a reminder we're in final freeze for Fedora 31, I'm assuming
people are testing it.
Just a reminder you can get the latest nightly composes here:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-31/compose/Spins/x86_64/iso/
Good. Your test result and traceback shows that GIR for WebKit2 is
not available.
/boot/olpc_build is created by olpc-os-builder when an operating
system image is prepared. It contains text that identifies the
release.
Here's what I've got in a lab laptop; "13.2.10 for XO-4 (build 22)"
The
Sorry for not providing the logs (thought I have provided them earlier).
Here are the logs:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/ro44qwtkw99SYY2acA3lPg
Update: I created the file olpc_build and now Sugar works. Thanks alot!
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 2:58 PM James Cameron wrote:
> Still, you have
Still, you have not shown us the error. Why not? Haven't you looked
at the cause yet? You really should do all you can to solve each
problem you face.
I'll have to speculate.
Sugar 0.112 src/jarabe/view/viewhelp.py line 38 onwards does import
WebKit if the system is recognised as OLPC OS
On a new VM I created yesterday, I didn't have the booting problem. I did
add http://rpmdropbox.laptop.org/f18/ as a repository and I installed
Sugar (and its dependencies) from that repo. It seems that WebKit/2 is not
properly installed or I must've done something wrong. Shell.log only has
one
The error about unity-settings-daemon can be ignored. It is caused by
OLPC customised /usr/bin/sugar which checks for systems with DMI BIOS
version data. You can see this by comparing /usr/bin/sugar with
the v0.112 bin/sugar.in on GitHub.
Yes, WebKit or WebKit2 is required.
You have a new
Interesting that you've tried to install from the repository using a
URL.
You must have missed adding the yum repository to /etc/yum.repos.d,
because had you done that the dependency resolution would have been
automatic.
You can see gwebsockets in the repository.
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at
I managed to install Sugar, But now if I run "sugar" I get, "Error:
unity-settings-daemon command not found". Checked shell.log for Sugar, it
said WebKit2 not found, I tried to install and then restarted the VM, now I
can't boot up.
Thanks.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 5:28 AM Kalpa Welivitigoda
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019, 23:00 Hrishi Patel, wrote:
> Hello,
> I tried. I still couldn't install Sugar. I tried "yum install -y
> http://rpmdropbox.laptop.org/f18/sugar-0.112.olpc.5-0.noarch.rpm; and got
> an error message "Error: Package: sugar-0.112.olpc.5-0.noarch
> (/sugar-0.112.olpc.5-0.noarch)
Hello,
I tried. I still couldn't install Sugar. I tried "yum install -y
http://rpmdropbox.laptop.org/f18/sugar-0.112.olpc.5-0.noarch.rpm; and got
an error message "Error: Package: sugar-0.112.olpc.5-0.noarch
(/sugar-0.112.olpc.5-0.noarch)
Requires: gwebsockets
You could try using --skip-broken
Thanks! I will try it soon!
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:05 AM James Cameron wrote:
> Fedora has automatic dependency resolution, provided the RPMs are in a
> repository and the package manager is configured to use that repository.
>
> Our http://rpmdropbox.laptop.org/f18/ is already a yum
Fedora has automatic dependency resolution, provided the RPMs are in a
repository and the package manager is configured to use that repository.
Our http://rpmdropbox.laptop.org/f18/ is already a yum repository,
which means on compatible architectures (i686, armv7hl), you may type
"sudo yum
I've used rpmbuild and created a .rpm file for sugar 0.112. I installed
some of the dependencies but couldn't figure out gwebsockets. If I try to
install gwebsockets with its rpm file, it requires another 3 dependencies
(typelib(Glib), typelib(GObject), typelib(Gio)). Is there a simpler way
to
Thanks Hrishi.
1. launch_bundle; is in Sugar 0.112,
2. sugar3.graphics.icon.CellRendererIcon; is in Sugar 0.112,
You are probably using an earlier version of Sugar bundled in
Fedora 18.
OLPC OS uses latest Sugar packages instead of bundled packages because
it is easier than pushing
Hello,
For the previous discussion, see this issue:
https://github.com/Hrishi1999/Dashboard.activity/issues/2
I set up my Fedora 18 test environment, installed sugar. Now if I run the
activity, I get the following errors:
1) ImportError: cannot import name launch_bundle
I am using launch_bundle
Hello All,
This is intended to ask questions and seek feedback.
I've not really had time to deal with Sugar for some time, but it also
doesn't tend to take up a lot of time so it's not been a major
problem, we glue it together when it breaks etc.
Kalpa has done a good job keeping most of the
To keep track of the bugs we found in the new Fedora 20 images,
please use the keyword F20.
I added a new Fedora 20 issues report to
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/report
--
Gonzalo Odiard
SugarLabs - Software for children learning
___
Sugar-devel
Thanks Gonzalo!
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
To keep track of the bugs we found in the new Fedora 20 images,
please use the keyword F20.
I added a new Fedora 20 issues report to
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/report
--
Gonzalo Odiard
Hello,
we are now officially supporting builds on Fedora 19. They are much faster
then on other distros because we can use the webkitgtk package instead of
building it
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
Since I struggled quite a bit I thought I'd report for others.
Fresh F14 install, almost completely updated (it cannot find the newest
kernel rpm in any repository for some reason, although it updated hundreds
Hi Bert,
Does it run OK if you run it as native on Fedora 14? You should be
able to select it from the GDM login prompt (once you click on a
user).
Peter
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
Since I struggled quite a bit I thought I'd report for others.
Running as a session it does not ask for a keyring password. Good. But there
are no peers in the neighborhood view either. There are no network logfiles
created in .sugar/default/logs, though according to ps, telepathy is running.
Presence-service fails with the same error.
- Bert -
On
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
Running as a session it does not ask for a keyring password. Good. But there
are no peers in the neighborhood view either. There are no network logfiles
created in .sugar/default/logs, though according to ps,
On 14.05.2011, at 23:06, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de
wrote:
Running as a session it does not ask for a keyring password. Good. But there
are no peers in the neighborhood view either. There are no network logfiles
created in
That's because sugar-presence-service-0.90.2-1.fc14 {which fixes this} needs
to be approved to move from testing to stable. If you install it from
updates-testing it should work correctly without the file.
In general there are a few things one needs to do to get Sugar working
beyond
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote:
That's because sugar-presence-service-0.90.2-1.fc14 {which fixes this} needs
to be approved to move from testing to stable. If you install it from
updates-testing it should work correctly without the file.
I make the
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:50, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
As some of you know I was at FUDCon Zurich last weekend. I took the
opportunity to sit down with Adam Williamson who is in charge of the
Fedora QA team and process to discuss how we could incorporate Sugar
and
Hi All,
As some of you know I was at FUDCon Zurich last weekend. I took the
opportunity to sit down with Adam Williamson who is in charge of the
Fedora QA team and process to discuss how we could incorporate Sugar
and SoaS testing into the QA process.
Adam agreed that we would be able to
Excerpts from Peter Robinson's message of Wed Sep 22 10:50:28 +0200 2010:
Adam agreed that we would be able to incorporate Sugar into the
Desktop QA which will expand our testing massively as Fedora has a
great QA team. It will also have the ability to allow us to block a
release if there is
Hi Peter,
these are just excellent news indeed!
On 09/22/2010 10:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
As some of you know I was at FUDCon Zurich last weekend. I took the
opportunity to sit down with Adam Williamson who is in charge of the
Fedora QA team and process to discuss how we could
2009/7/15 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
I've had both Soas and Sugar on Fedora installed in KVM machines. A
year ago or so I had problems with the joyride builds, so that's
progress... :-)
Joyride builds weren't intended to run on non-XO hardware, so that's expected.
Soas seems to work
4) There are going to be a lot of extra, unneeded packages that I'd
like to get rid of. I hoped that there was a Fedora spin of sugar,
but it appears that was folded into Soas. But Soas is not designed
to be installed on a hard disk. Why not? Why not give people the
ability to setup a
Thanks for the suggestions. In the meantime I found that the last
session automatically becomes the default so that's cool. I also
found that I could change the keyboard at login. So I'm covered here
too.
Thanks
--
Philippe
--
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
I've had both Soas and Sugar on Fedora installed in KVM machines. A
year ago or so I had problems with the joyride builds, so that's
progress... :-)
Soas seems to work just fine so far. I have a couple of issues with
Fedora but I am not sure yet they qualify as bugs.
1) I need a way to make
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 05:24:22PM -0500, Philippe Clérié wrote:
I hoped that there was a Fedora spin of sugar, but it appears that
was folded into Soas. But Soas is not designed to be installed on a
hard disk.
What do you want on a Sugar Fedora spin besides what yum install
sugar* gets you?
37 matches
Mail list logo
