Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-19 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
David, I can't understand you. You talk a lot about how much you want participate, but then start attacking me. And now, you say: Hmmm. Flavio and others have been trying to send patches for years. They have been ignored so they fork. Look at the history of TamTam uploads:

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-19 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Flavio, Ok, is not a patch, is a entire repository. Sadly, for me is impossible get from there what are the changes needed to make TamTam work in every hardware, or what changes are useful upstream. Is bad, because you worked a lot, and that is the only I wanted to say. Is nothing personal,

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Sebastian, You are a editor in ASLO, can you upload the xo bundles if we coordinate the version numbers? Gonzalo On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote: El 17/11/13 13:20, Gonzalo Odiard escribió: Sebastian said he don't want make changes in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 06:56:25 -0500 From: sebast...@fuentelibre.org To: dwnarv...@gmail.com CC: fdane...@activitycentral.com; gonz...@laptop.org; cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini El 17/11/13 14:27, Daniel Narvaez escribió

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
2013 06:56:25 -0500 From: sebast...@fuentelibre.org To: dwnarv...@gmail.com CC: fdane...@activitycentral.com; gonz...@laptop.org; cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini El 17/11/13 14:27, Daniel Narvaez escribió: I don't know

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 18/11/13 06:02, Gonzalo Odiard escribió: Sebastian, You are a editor in ASLO, can you upload the xo bundles if we coordinate the version numbers? Gonzalo Gonzalo, Editors in ASLO only get to approve. It won't let us upload new bundles. Sebastian

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 17/11/13 12:58, Gonzalo Odiard escribió: I hope we can solve the performance problems then you don't need use a old Sugar version, to avoid all these problems. Well, I don't think it's likely you or me will be able to fix this one. It's lower level than Python and it looks to be by

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Ok. Can tell me what versions are you using right now of these activities? Jukebox Paint Read Write Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote: El 18/11/13 06:02, Gonzalo Odiard escribió: Sebastian, You are a editor in ASLO, can you upload

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Sebastian Silva
Obviously it would not be ideal solution to be listed as author when all I did was merge .po files. But then again, author field in ASLO is not accurate at all, most of the time. You can find my bundles at: http://people.sugarlabs.org/icarito/activities/ Regards, Sebastian El 18/11/13 07:08,

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
There are some ow level stuff, but we can solve some problems in the activities too. You can see the other thread I started about performance. Also, dsd solved some of the problems related with the dynamic bindings. Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Sebastian Silva

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
And we can tackle lower level stuff... It's free and open code too! :) On Monday, 18 November 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: There are some ow level stuff, but we can solve some problems in the activities too. You can see the other thread I started about performance. Also, dsd solved some of

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Also note that we don't necessarily need to fix the code ourselves, good profiling data is often acted on by lower level libraries maintainers. The default strategy is to pretend it's higher level code fault of course, but issues can't be denied or ignored when proven by numbers and test cases :P

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread David Farning
Did anyone else notice a difference in how this Activity and Pippy were handled? With pippy the maintainers quickly responded with Cool someone else wants to add value to the project. Here are my notes. Good luck. With TamTam the maintainer responded with My way or the highway. On Mon, Nov 18,

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Walter Bender
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:07 PM, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.com wrote: Did anyone else notice a difference in how this Activity and Pippy were handled? With pippy the maintainers quickly responded with Cool someone else wants to add value to the project. Here are my notes. Good

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
David, if you want to make a fair comparison, you need to take in account what was submitted! Try to submit six copies of the same codebase (instead of a patch) to any other free software project on heart. I bet our reaction will compare *very* favourably in friendliness. Seriously, stop

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Flavio Danesse
Sorry to put me back, but to bring a little clarity on TamTam: Do not say that the patch is huge because I never send a patch for this just to avoid giving this discussion which does not yield as well. If you look at my first mail on the subject I told him what I had done and posted where it was

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hi Flavio, On 19 November 2013 00:02, Flavio Danesse fdane...@activitycentral.comwrote: Sorry to put me back, but to bring a little clarity on TamTam: Do not say that the patch is huge because I never send a patch for this just to avoid giving this discussion which does not yield as well.

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread David Farning
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: David, if you want to make a fair comparison, you need to take in account what was submitted! Hmmm. Flavio and others have been trying to send patches for years. They have been ignored so they fork. At which point

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 19 November 2013 02:52, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.comwrote: Seriously, stop thinking you are being treaten unfairly. You are not. This is about open source best practices. The goal is to highlight the difference a maintainer's attitude has on the tone of a discussion. Try

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-18 Thread James Cameron
The trouble with tone is that it involves subjective detection, and is prone to bias and error during the process. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Sebastian Silva
In Flavio's defense, I'd like to restructure this conversation. Undoubtedly, he's put great effort in this work. From a deployment's point of view, it's a contribution. From Gonzalo's POV, it's a burden because Flavio hasn't taken up learning to master Git. From Localizer's POV it's a burden

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 17/11/13 12:38, Sebastian Silva escribió: I spent the last month trying to get mantainers to respond to requests to update GTK2 branches with translations, with barely any response except Manuq and Gonzalo, and only the first actually took action on my request. BTW, in our latest public

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Chris Leonard
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: In Flavio's defense, I'd like to restructure this conversation. Undoubtedly, he's put great effort in this work. And there are mechanisms for incorporating that work for the benefit of all. From a deployment's

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Sebastian, I think you are not understanding the problem. Of course, anybody can fork and upload another activity, but that is nightmare on the long run, to maintainers and to users. Imagine how good for users will be have different versions of the activities, some running, some not, depending

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote: El 17/11/13 12:38, Sebastian Silva escribió: I spent the last month trying to get mantainers to respond to requests to update GTK2 branches with translations, with barely any response except Manuq and Gonzalo,

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 17 November 2013 18:38, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote: In Flavio's defense, I'd like to restructure this conversation. Undoubtedly, he's put great effort in this work. I suspect it's a great contribution, which is exactly why I'm mad it's not going upstream... In my

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 17 November 2013 18:58, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: El 17/11/13 12:38, Sebastian Silva escribió: I spent the last month trying to get mantainers to respond to requests to update GTK2

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 November 2013 18:58, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: El 17/11/13 12:38, Sebastian Silva escribió: I spent the

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 17 November 2013 19:20, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Like I see it, is not a fork. Sebastian said he don't want make changes in the activities, only want add translation files, and package them in a xo file. If someone needs to package gtk2 activities, how they will know they

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 17/11/13 13:12, Daniel Narvaez escribió: I spent the last month trying to get mantainers to respond to requests to update GTK2 branches with translations, with barely any response except Manuq and Gonzalo, and only the first actually took action on my request. I think

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 17/11/13 13:20, Gonzalo Odiard escribió: Sebastian said he don't want make changes in the activities, only want add translation files, and package them in a xo file. Actually I was very specific in stating what I needed was to have updated .xo bundles in ASLO. Sebastian

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-17 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 17 November 2013 20:02, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote: El 17/11/13 13:12, Daniel Narvaez escribió: I spent the last month trying to get mantainers to respond to requests to update GTK2 branches with translations, with barely any response except Manuq and Gonzalo, and

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-16 Thread David Farning
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Flavio Danesse fdane...@activitycentral.com wrote: I wanted to inform maintainers TamTam : These last few days I've added a little love to TamTamMini. This is an application that has been added Ceibal instruments and small arrangements over the years, but for

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-16 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 16 November 2013 10:23, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.comwrote: TamTamMini separated from other Suite applications, deleting files that were not used. I deleted the images were not used or those that were not necessary. Corrected, I simplified and cleaned up the code. As

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-16 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Can you explain why you needed to create a separate activity for each type of hardware? On 16 November 2013 01:02, Flavio Danesse fdane...@activitycentral.comwrote: *I wanted to inform maintainers TamTam :* These last few days I've added a little love to TamTamMini. This is an application

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-16 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Hi Flavio, I am maintaining TamTam suite right now. While I appreciate your work, you are doing it again difficult for a maintainer work with you. I have talked about this in other opportunities, then you already know it. You have decided important changes without trying to ask the opinion of

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-16 Thread Flavio Danesse
I am aware of the problem, why not send any patch . But it seemed important to inform the work I did in case the application mantiners somehow wanted to use it as this is the version that is used on all machines of Ceibal after passing the Activity Central testing makes before entering the

Re: [Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-16 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Flavio Danesse fdane...@activitycentral.com wrote: I am aware of the problem, why not send any patch . But it seemed important to inform the work I did in case the application mantiners somehow wanted to use it as this is the version that is used on all

[Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

2013-11-15 Thread Flavio Danesse
*I wanted to inform maintainers TamTam :* These last few days I've added a little love to TamTamMini. This is an application that has been added Ceibal instruments and small arrangements over the years, but for various reasons, changes were never implemented in the official repository, so that

Re: [Sugar-devel] tamtammini-57.xo, csound and ubuntu

2011-04-03 Thread Andrea Mayr
Hi Jonas! Not yet. Well, i reported the problems to a friend who is doing package maintainance for debian. I thought he could sort the problem and give advice for further actions. Unfortunately i didn't hear back from him. Furthermore i posted the log file in the ubuntu forums:

Re: [Sugar-devel] tamtammini-57.xo, csound and ubuntu

2011-04-02 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Andrea, On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:13:41AM +0200, Andrea Mayr wrote: Two years ago i tried so hard to get it running (on debian), but failed. Did you ever try report to Debian the problems you encountered? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45

[Sugar-devel] tamtammini-57.xo, csound and ubuntu

2011-04-01 Thread Andrea Mayr
Hi! I am putting together an Ubuntu based Live-System for Kids from 6 to 12 years. I am exited that sugar is available as a package for installation within Ubuntu now. Two years ago i tried so hard to get it running (on debian), but failed. Most of the activities are now running without problems

Re: [Sugar-devel] tamtammini-57.xo, csound and ubuntu

2011-04-01 Thread Sebastian Silva
Hello Andrea, Yes this is the correct place to ask. I have the exact same problem on my machine with Trisquel 10.04. I've looked and there isnt a bug report so I made one: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2744 I've put you on CC so you get news on it. Thanks for the report! El 01/04/11 04:13,

Re: [Sugar-devel] tamtammini-57.xo, csound and ubuntu

2011-04-01 Thread Art Hunkins
with more expertise than I should address this possibility. Art Hunkins - Original Message - From: Andrea Mayr andrea.m...@netbridge.at To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 5:13 AM Subject: [Sugar-devel] tamtammini-57.xo, csound and ubuntu Hi! I am putting