+1
I made a similar suggestion a couple of weeks back.
Thinking as someone who will probably be in it up to his neck, on the
teaching side, what I would like to see is a polished distribution,
installable on a hard disk, released once a year around April-May. That will
give me all summer to e
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 16:05, Peter Robinson wrote:
> I would prefer to filter messages client side rather than having
> something enforced on me.
>
Er, it's not *enforced*, as if you don't specify any topic you'll get all
mail sent to the list. Please see the help text Kevin posted earlier in
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Luke Faraone wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 13:56, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>>
>> To Martin's point, how about the routine use of a filterable tag,
>> [SoaS] , in the Subject to messages appropriately routed to either
>> IAEP or Devel or both?
>
> I just created a
b
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Luke Faraone wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 13:56, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>>
>> To Martin's point, how about the routine use of a filterable tag,
>> [SoaS] , in the Subject to messages appropriately routed to either
>> IAEP or Devel or both?
>
> I just create
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:47:21PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Sebastian Dziallas
>> wrote:
>>> Short Term Action Items:
>>> * We create a SoaS mailing list.
>>> * We establish the SoaS development team.
>>
>> if you split off sugar-d
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:04:28PM -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 13:56, Walter Bender wrote:
To Martin's point, how about the routine use of a filterable tag,
[SoaS] , in the Subject to messages appropriately routed to either
IAEP or Devel or both?
I just created a "Sug
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:47:21PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Short Term Action Items:
* We create a SoaS mailing list.
* We establish the SoaS development team.
if you split off sugar-dev, to reach the involved people you either
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 13:56, Walter Bender wrote:
> To Martin's point, how about the routine use of a filterable tag,
> [SoaS] , in the Subject to messages appropriately routed to either
> IAEP or Devel or both?
I just created a "Sugar on a Stick" topic on Sugar-Devel's mailman, which
matches
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Sebastian Dziallas
> wrote:
>> Short Term Action Items:
>> * We create a SoaS mailing list.
>> * We establish the SoaS development team.
>
> if you split off sugar-dev, to reach the involved people you eit
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> Short Term Action Items:
> * We create a SoaS mailing list.
> * We establish the SoaS development team.
if you split off sugar-dev, to reach the involved people you either
have to crosspost all the time, or get everyone sub'd to both.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>
+1 to pretty much your whole message.
I would like a little clarification though on the boundaries of SoaS.
My interpretation is as follows:
SoaS takes the XO 1-1 model and replaces the one machine per student
with one stick per s
This document is an open letter written to the Sugar Labs community. It
is an attempt to clear up the recent confusion about SoaS and let
community members know what SoaS is, what our goals are with regards to
it, and what possibilities we're considering for the future - both
technical and orga
12 matches
Mail list logo
