Re: [Sugar-devel] Trac: added 1.0 milestone

2010-10-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 14:10, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote:
 Hi!

 I just added a 1.0 milestone to Trac and used it for a ticket. The
 intended meaning is we should change (or at least look at) this before
 we declare the API 'stable' (whatever that means ;) ). If anyone has
 a better name for that milestone we can rename it.

Why a milestone and not a tag? The meaning we have been giving to
milestones doesn't seem to be exactly that.

Regards,

Tomeu

 Similarly, if we
 decided to call the next release (that would be 0.92) 1.0 because of
 the API break Gnome forced on us, we can rename it to 2.0.
 It's only meant to be used for things that affect API, especially
 activity API.

 Sascha

 --
 http://sascha.silbe.org/
 http://www.infra-silbe.de/

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] Trac: added 1.0 milestone

2010-10-04 Thread Sascha Silbe
Hi!

I just added a 1.0 milestone to Trac and used it for a ticket. The
intended meaning is we should change (or at least look at) this before
we declare the API 'stable' (whatever that means ;) ). If anyone has
a better name for that milestone we can rename it. Similarly, if we
decided to call the next release (that would be 0.92) 1.0 because of
the API break Gnome forced on us, we can rename it to 2.0.
It's only meant to be used for things that affect API, especially
activity API.

Sascha

--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel