Re: [Sugar-devel] Weekly test request reminders? (was Re: Priorities for testing)
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 16:10 +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: > I am doing XO builds containing the latest Sugar (0.90) for the XO [2]. > > So given from your information, that should be a good way for you to > test 0.90. Indeed, we are testing these builds. Thanks for preparing them. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Weekly test request reminders? (was Re: Priorities for testing)
On 09/29/2010 08:47 PM, Tom Parker wrote: On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 14:30 +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: that would be excellent indeed. We especially need help with 0.90 testing. What hardware and software setup are you using for testing? XOs? Soas? In Auckland we have quite a lot of XO-1s (mostly CL1 models) and a few XO-1.5s (mostly prototypes with the wireless powersaving hardware fault). We have virtualbox and regular laptop hardware, but I don't think we have anything on which wireless works with soas. We also have a schoolserver and good internet connectivity. Wellington has a similar number of XOs, but I'll let Tim describe their soas, virtualbox and other resources. See http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_New_Zealand Personally, I find XO, SoaS and VirtualBox images easiest to test, we download the night before and re-image our XOs or make new SoaS. For example there is a Sugar 0.90 release email on this list today and I have no idea what I'd do with the source. Hi Tom, the announcements do tell people that the sources are available. Then it has to be packaged by distributions (Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu etc...). From there Spins like Soas or the XO picks them up [1]. I am doing XO builds containing the latest Sugar (0.90) for the XO [2]. So given from your information, that should be a good way for you to test 0.90. I will do a new build by the end of the week. Watch out for the announcement. Thanks, Simon [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.90/Notes#Update_to_this_version [2] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-October/027456.html ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Weekly test request reminders? (was Re: Priorities for testing)
On 30 September 2010 09:31, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > Are there any plans to provide remote participation via Skype or similar > to these talks? > > Contrary to popular opinion, not everyone who works for OLPC will be going > to San Fransisco next month :) > > --- > Samuel Greenfeld > QA Engineer, OLPC Association > > > There is a "attendee" area at the bottom of http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_SanFranciscoBayArea/OLPCSF_Community_Summit_2010 It shows people who are attending via skype (Caryl and Cherry listed so far) so think someone is making it possible to attend remotely. The organisers are also listed on that page. I would really like to see as much as possible participation from the global community. Tabitha ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Weekly test request reminders? (was Re: Priorities for testing)
Are there any plans to provide remote participation via Skype or similar to these talks? Contrary to popular opinion, not everyone who works for OLPC will be going to San Fransisco next month :) --- Samuel Greenfeld QA Engineer, OLPC Association On 9/29/2010 4:24 PM, Tabitha Roder wrote: Coordinating tests between OLPC & Sugar Labs is an interesting one. It's something I've been working on for several months [1]. Perhaps there could be a BOF session with a few people in San Fran to work out the simplest way forward? Tim Added testing to the wiki page for San Fran Summit topics. Thanks for the suggestion. Tabitha ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Weekly test request reminders? (was Re: Priorities for testing)
> > Coordinating tests between OLPC & Sugar Labs is an interesting one. It's > something I've been working on for several months [1]. Perhaps there could > be a BOF session with a few people in San Fran to work out the simplest way > forward? > > Tim > Added testing to the wiki page for San Fran Summit topics. Thanks for the suggestion. Tabitha ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Weekly test request reminders? (was Re: Priorities for testing)
On 30 September 2010 07:56, Tabitha Roder wrote: > That would be nice. If you add a "[Testing]" tag to those mails we could >> set up a mailing list topic to allow people to opt-out (see the >> subscription options [1]). If mailman supports sorting a message into >> multiple topics, a [Reminder] topic might be useful as well. >> >> Sascha >> >> [1] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/options/sugar-devel >> >> > We currently use the mailing list test...@lists.laptop.org > Considering the huge number of lists that many of us follow I would like us > to consider whether we need to use another list. There are 16 lists on > lists.sugarlabs.org and over 100 lists on lists.laptop.org and many of us > follow quite a few and the lines between olpc and Sugar are blurred because > if you support one you are often found supporting the other. > Could we use test...@lists.laptop.org or do we need to separate out Sugar > testing for non XO hardware? Whatever is decided I will follow, just making > sure we think it through. > Thanks > Tabitha > Hi Tabitha, I think Sascha was just asking that we add [Testing] to messages to sugar-devel. This means that people can opt-out of those messages in the list's administration setting. Coordinating tests between OLPC & Sugar Labs is an interesting one. It's something I've been working on for several months [1]. Perhaps there could be a BOF session with a few people in San Fran to work out the simplest way forward? Tim [1] http://people.sugarlabs.org/~tim/testing ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Weekly test request reminders? (was Re: Priorities for testing)
> > That would be nice. If you add a "[Testing]" tag to those mails we could > set up a mailing list topic to allow people to opt-out (see the > subscription options [1]). If mailman supports sorting a message into > multiple topics, a [Reminder] topic might be useful as well. > > Sascha > > [1] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/options/sugar-devel > > We currently use the mailing list test...@lists.laptop.org Considering the huge number of lists that many of us follow I would like us to consider whether we need to use another list. There are 16 lists on lists.sugarlabs.org and over 100 lists on lists.laptop.org and many of us follow quite a few and the lines between olpc and Sugar are blurred because if you support one you are often found supporting the other. Could we use test...@lists.laptop.org or do we need to separate out Sugar testing for non XO hardware? Whatever is decided I will follow, just making sure we think it through. Thanks Tabitha ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Weekly test request reminders? (was Re: Priorities for testing)
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 14:30 +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: > that would be excellent indeed. We especially need help with 0.90 > testing. What hardware and software setup are you using for testing? > XOs? Soas? In Auckland we have quite a lot of XO-1s (mostly CL1 models) and a few XO-1.5s (mostly prototypes with the wireless powersaving hardware fault). We have virtualbox and regular laptop hardware, but I don't think we have anything on which wireless works with soas. We also have a schoolserver and good internet connectivity. Wellington has a similar number of XOs, but I'll let Tim describe their soas, virtualbox and other resources. See http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_New_Zealand Personally, I find XO, SoaS and VirtualBox images easiest to test, we download the night before and re-image our XOs or make new SoaS. For example there is a Sugar 0.90 release email on this list today and I have no idea what I'd do with the source. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Weekly test request reminders? (was Re: Priorities for testing)
Excerpts from Tim McNamara's message of Sun Sep 26 22:04:56 +0200 2010: > Sorry about that Sascha. We meet every weekend (Friday evening in Europe, > Friday afternoon USA) , but haven't received many direct requests in a > while. Ah, good to know. > If it would be worthwhile, I can send out reminders in the middle of the > week asking for things that are worthwhile to be manually tested. Do people > think that would be excessive? That would be nice. If you add a "[Testing]" tag to those mails we could set up a mailing list topic to allow people to opt-out (see the subscription options [1]). If mailman supports sorting a message into multiple topics, a [Reminder] topic might be useful as well. Sascha [1] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/options/sugar-devel -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Weekly test request reminders? (was Re: Priorities for testing)
On 09/26/2010 10:04 PM, Tim McNamara wrote: > On 25 September 2010 21:07, Sascha Silbe< > sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org> wrote: > >> Excerpts from Tim McNamara's message of Fri Sep 24 22:37:18 +0200 2010: >> >>> The New Zealand testing groups will be operating in a few hours. If you >> have >>> any requests for things to be explored, please respond within 5 hours. >> >> That was a bit short notice. > > > Sorry about that Sascha. We meet every weekend (Friday evening in Europe, > Friday afternoon USA) , but haven't received many direct requests in a > while. > > If it would be worthwhile, I can send out reminders in the middle of the > week asking for things that are worthwhile to be manually tested. Do people > think that would be excessive? > > Tim Hi Tim, that would be excellent indeed. We especially need help with 0.90 testing. What hardware and software setup are you using for testing? XOs? Soas? Regards, Simon ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Weekly test request reminders? (was Re: Priorities for testing)
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 22:04, Tim McNamara wrote: > > On 25 September 2010 21:07, Sascha Silbe > wrote: >> >> Excerpts from Tim McNamara's message of Fri Sep 24 22:37:18 +0200 2010: >> >> > The New Zealand testing groups will be operating in a few hours. If you >> > have >> > any requests for things to be explored, please respond within 5 hours. >> >> That was a bit short notice. > > Sorry about that Sascha. We meet every weekend (Friday evening in Europe, > Friday afternoon USA) , but haven't received many direct requests in a > while. > If it would be worthwhile, I can send out reminders in the middle of the > week asking for things that are worthwhile to be manually tested. Do people > think that would be excessive? I think it would be very appropriate. Thanks for the great work! Tomeu > Tim > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Weekly test request reminders? (was Re: Priorities for testing)
On 25 September 2010 21:07, Sascha Silbe < sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org> wrote: > Excerpts from Tim McNamara's message of Fri Sep 24 22:37:18 +0200 2010: > > > The New Zealand testing groups will be operating in a few hours. If you > have > > any requests for things to be explored, please respond within 5 hours. > > That was a bit short notice. Sorry about that Sascha. We meet every weekend (Friday evening in Europe, Friday afternoon USA) , but haven't received many direct requests in a while. If it would be worthwhile, I can send out reminders in the middle of the week asking for things that are worthwhile to be manually tested. Do people think that would be excessive? Tim ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
