-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:24:38PM -0500, Mick Weiss wrote:
We do need to take into consideration that not every language has
activities, some have actividades or Aktivitäten etc.
Is this something that we can support through CNAMEs? The config file
2009/2/18 Chris Ball c...@laptop.org:
Hi,
activities.sugarlabs.org
+1 to activities here. Makes it clear and straightforward that it's the
place to get Sugar activities, which is what it's for.
Agreed, +1 to activities in spite of what I will write below.
Since an argument against it
Ok,
Then activities it shall be. Due to the complexity of the code, it
uses mod_extensively, The move is going to have to be cold turkey.
Steps.
1 . Bernie point activities.sugarlab.org,
activities-testing.sugarlabs.org, and activities-devel.sugarlabs.org
at sunjammer.
2. I will create the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 07:21:23AM +1800, David Farning wrote:
Ok,
Then activities it shall be. Due to the complexity of the code, it
uses mod_extensively, The move is going to have to be cold turkey.
Wauw, mod_extensively. That indeed sounds
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 07:21:23AM +1800, David Farning wrote:
Ok,
Then activities it shall be. Due to the complexity of the code, it
uses mod_extensively, The move is going to
There has been some talk of what the final name for aslo should be.
addons.sugarlabs.org
or
activities.sugarlabs.org
Which do you prefer? I like activities.sl.o better but it means more
work for me to change it. So, for me, it is a wash.
david
(Contributors with marketing or brand development
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:48 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
There has been some talk of what the final name for aslo should be.
addons.sugarlabs.org
+1, with a redirect from the other URL.
It is more apt and inclusive.
--
Luke Faraone
http://luke.faraone.cc
Hi,
activities.sugarlabs.org
+1 to activities here. Makes it clear and straightforward that it's the
place to get Sugar activities, which is what it's for.
Since an argument against it is that we want the site to host more than
activities, could someone enumerate what sort of things we can
On 18 Feb 2009, at 21:48, David Farning wrote:
There has been some talk of what the final name for aslo should be.
addons.sugarlabs.org
or
activities.sugarlabs.org
+1 to activities, it's sugar friendly, relevant, and to be honest
'addons' as a (non-dictionary) name seems alien to me with
+1 to activities.sl.o.
Seems like a pretty strong vote. :)
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Eben Eliason wrote:
+1 for activities from me, as well.
Addons makes it sound
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg g...@redhat.com wrote:
+1 to activities.sl.o.
Ok, I'm willing to go with the overwhelming consensus and change my +1 to
activities. (which was mostly a
[[WP:ILIKEIT]]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ILIKEIT#I_like_itargument
anyway)
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:48 AM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
There has been some talk of what the final name for aslo should be.
addons.sugarlabs.org
or
activities.sugarlabs.org
Which do you prefer? I like activities.sl.o better but it means more
work for me to change it.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Korakurider korakuri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:48 AM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
There has been some talk of what the final name for aslo should be.
addons.sugarlabs.org
or
activities.sugarlabs.org
Which do you
13 matches
Mail list logo
