On 11 Feb 2009, at 16:25, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 16:52, Gary C Martin
> wrote:
>> On 11 Feb 2009, at 05:59, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>>
>>> Stock F9 emacs isn't very usable on the XO screen, unfortunately.
>>> Lack
>>> of fonts and high dpi make it rather painful. After s
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 16:52, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2009, at 05:59, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> Stock F9 emacs isn't very usable on the XO screen, unfortunately. Lack
>> of fonts and high dpi make it rather painful. After struggling a bit
>> to get a comfy hacking/editing environment o
On 11 Feb 2009, at 05:59, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Stock F9 emacs isn't very usable on the XO screen, unfortunately. Lack
> of fonts and high dpi make it rather painful. After struggling a bit
> to get a comfy hacking/editing environment on my XOs, I ended up
> installing the precooked Xft-enabled
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Samuel Klein wrote:
>> Also, the XO ships with a very limited vim. yum install vim-enhanced
>> has improved my part-time vim usage.
>
> can we fix this in the next refresh? how much extra space did it
> take? vim is useful.
We do have vim-minimal, which works, b
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> Also, the XO ships with a very limited vim. yum install vim-enhanced
> has improved my part-time vim usage.
can we fix this in the next refresh? how much extra space did it
take? vim is useful.
_
Stock F9 emacs isn't very usable on the XO screen, unfortunately. Lack
of fonts and high dpi make it rather painful. After struggling a bit
to get a comfy hacking/editing environment on my XOs, I ended up
installing the precooked Xft-enabled emacs rpms, as per:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Emacs
6 matches
Mail list logo