On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 03:11, Michael Hutak wrote:
> I think that's a great idea SJ. In my experience in the Pacific, we get no
> requests for shipping with windows and all our engagement with MOE's on
> curricula and software and training surrounds Sugar. I think it wld be great
> to highlight in
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 05:35, Samuel Klein wrote:
> That news blurb was certainly bold... it's also from Fall 2008. It's
> harder to spread FUD when a couple years of stories of XOs in
> classrooms involve Sugar.
I agree, but the situation we have right now is that people that know
what an OS
That news blurb was certainly bold... it's also from Fall 2008. It's
harder to spread FUD when a couple years of stories of XOs in
classrooms involve Sugar.
I would like to work together on a series of blog posts about the new
Sugar version that will be shipping on the 1.5's. If some of the
act
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:20 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> I don't think that nor OLPC nor SLs can do much against MS' press machine:
>
> http://www.scidev.net/en/new-technologies/digital-divide/low-cost-laptops-to-change-from-linux-to-microsoft.html
>
> But if from time to time OLPC's press releas
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 00:21, Samuel Klein wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:07, Walter Bender wrote:
>>
>> I think we are looking at a great probortunity here. We have a project
>
> My mind balks at that word, but I agree with this mess
5 matches
Mail list logo
