Re: [Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how can IJoin?)

2009-02-11 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Still, the Debian packaging currently takes no special care for eventual > special Sugar needs. If olpcsound is only about leaving out CPU-heavy > stuff it should be a problem only for XO hardware (and similar low-end > har

Re: [Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how can IJoin?)

2009-02-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:51:48PM +, victor wrote: >Yes, originally this was an XO-fedora only thing. However the >olpcsound 'lightweight' option is actually in the upstream sources >(as a build option). You mean olpcsound.spec in upstream CSound

Re: [Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how can IJoin?)

2009-02-11 Thread David Farning
bly updated (as the Debian > cycle permits). > > Regards > > Victor > > - Original Message - > From: "Jonas Smedegaard" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:32 PM > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how can &

Re: [Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how can IJoin?)

2009-02-11 Thread victor
3:32 PM Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how can IJoin?) > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:37:17PM +, victor wrote: >>> Actually, your expertise would be needed to get the csound packages