-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Still, the Debian packaging currently takes no special care for eventual
> special Sugar needs. If olpcsound is only about leaving out CPU-heavy
> stuff it should be a problem only for XO hardware (and similar low-end
> har
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:51:48PM +, victor wrote:
>Yes, originally this was an XO-fedora only thing. However the
>olpcsound 'lightweight' option is actually in the upstream sources
>(as a build option).
You mean olpcsound.spec in upstream CSound
bly updated (as the Debian
> cycle permits).
>
> Regards
>
> Victor
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jonas Smedegaard"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how can
&
3:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how can
IJoin?)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:37:17PM +, victor wrote:
>>> Actually, your expertise would be needed to get the csound packages
4 matches
Mail list logo