Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-17 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/8/11 Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com: What are the user interfaces like when dealing with multiple activities? Well, we have this already, it's called the Journal. Just download Activity bundles and they all live there (and have done as far back as I can recall)... If I click on a

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-13 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:24:46AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: On 10 Aug 2009, at 17:24, Daniel Drake wrote: 2009/8/10 Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com: Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps? Like, we're under a tree and here's my patched Terminal/Pippy/Speak that you

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-13 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 03:51:43PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:24:46AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: On 10 Aug 2009, at 17:24, Daniel Drake wrote: 2009/8/10 Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com: Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps? Like, we're under a

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 03:24, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote: On 10 Aug 2009, at 17:24, Daniel Drake wrote: 2009/8/10 Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com: Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps?  Like, we're under a tree and here's my patched Terminal/Pippy/Speak that you

[Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, any opinions on this? Thanks, Tomeu On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 18:44, SugarLabs Bugsbugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org wrote: #1042: cannot install new activity version --+-    Reporter:  sascha_silbe               |    

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/8/10 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org: Hi, any opinions on this? I dislike the idea of having multiple versions installed at once. The argument I saw for this case was that different versions might have incompatibilities in their collaboration protocols, but I feel that we should instead

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Martin Dengler
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:26:58PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: 2009/8/10 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org: Hi, any opinions on this? I dislike the idea of having multiple versions installed at once. The argument I saw for this case was that different versions might have

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 17:48, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:26:58PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: 2009/8/10 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org: Hi, any opinions on this? I dislike the idea of having multiple versions installed at once. The argument

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
Martin Dengler wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:26:58PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: 2009/8/10 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org: Hi, any opinions on this? I dislike the idea of having multiple versions installed at once. The argument I saw for this case was that different versions might

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Eben Eliason
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartzbmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Martin Dengler wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:26:58PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: 2009/8/10 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org: Hi, any opinions on this? I dislike the idea of having multiple versions

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/8/10 Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com: Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps?  Like, we're under a tree and here's my patched Terminal/Pippy/Speak that you may want to try but not commit to blowing-away your official version... Do we have the relevant

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Martin Dengler
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:09:06PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: 2009/8/10 Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com: Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps?  Like, we're under a tree and here's my patched Terminal/Pippy/Speak that you may want to try but not commit to blowing-away your

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Gabriel Eirea
I think I agree with both Ben and Tomeu, here. Supporting multiple activity versions is crucial to allowing kids to modify activities, or create their own. At the same time, I also believe that a new owner (as in the example of modifying the Speak activity under a tree) should result in a new

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Gary C Martin
On 10 Aug 2009, at 17:24, Daniel Drake wrote: 2009/8/10 Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com: Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps? Like, we're under a tree and here's my patched Terminal/Pippy/Speak that you may want to try but not commit to blowing-away your official