Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar master will depend on simplejson again
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 01:41:17PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 01:17:49PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: [Debian] could it be that 2.5 is only the default and that it is fine for a package to depend on python 2.6? No, that's not the case. Python 2.6 is only available in experimental, not in unstable or testing. Even when Python2-6 appears in unstable, it is most probably a problem still as long as not being the default, due to some Python modules only compiled for the default Python version (multi-version Python module support is optional and raise packaging complexity considerably except when using CDBS, which is discouraged for other reasons by some developers). Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar master will depend on simplejson again
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 01:17:49PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: [Debian] could it be that 2.5 is only the default and that it is fine for a package to depend on python 2.6? No, that's not the case. Python 2.6 is only available in experimental, not in unstable or testing. CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar master will depend on simplejson again
On 11/19/2009 05:54 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:33:05PM +, Daniel Drake wrote: > >> We've found that sugar's recent switch to cjson has caused issues and >> cjson upstream doesn't seem receptive to fixing them. > The latter isn't quite true: It has rejected the specific patch for > technical reasons (and proposed a different way to fix it). Unfortunately > a) quite some time (without it getting fixed upstream) has passed since and > b) I didn't get any response from upstream when asking about when it > might get fixed. > So for all practical purposes (except someone coming up with a better > patch) it's the same. :-/ > > CU Sascha Hey Sascha, could it be that 2.5 is only the default and that it is fine for a package to depend on python 2.6? Regards, Simon ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar master will depend on simplejson again
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:33:05PM +, Daniel Drake wrote: We've found that sugar's recent switch to cjson has caused issues and cjson upstream doesn't seem receptive to fixing them. The latter isn't quite true: It has rejected the specific patch for technical reasons (and proposed a different way to fix it). Unfortunately a) quite some time (without it getting fixed upstream) has passed since and b) I didn't get any response from upstream when asking about when it might get fixed. So for all practical purposes (except someone coming up with a better patch) it's the same. :-/ CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] sugar master will depend on simplejson again
Hi, We've found that sugar's recent switch to cjson has caused issues and cjson upstream doesn't seem receptive to fixing them. So the plan is to move back to simplejson on monday, like things were before. Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
